Abstract The work about to be described is a continuation of an investigation begun by one of us at Princeton, New Jersey, on the scattering of electrons by gas atoms. The conditions there were so chosen that only single collisions were taken into account, and it was possible to investigate not only the energy loss on collision, as in the Franck and Hertz experiments, but also the direction of the path of the electron after collision. By employing a magnetic analysis of the velocity of the electron after impact it was found possible to obtain information as to the probability of excitation of various stationary states of the atom considered, on collision with electrons of much higher velocities than could previously be used. The curves relating scattered intensity with angle of scattering were found to have sharp maxima, which were strongly suggestive of diffraction maxima, as might be expected if the motion of electrons is governed by the wave mechanics. But whereas the wave mechanics has been eminently successful in explaining the scattering results of Davisson and Germer with single metal crystals, and of Thomson and Rupp with thin metal foils the results of Dymond have been inexplicable on this basis. It may be said at once that we have been unable to find any trace of the sharp maxima found by him in I, which were apparently due to a secondary cause. Indeed, as has recently been pointed out by Elsasser, no interference effects can be expected, when the electron loses energy on collision, the case in which Dymond found maxima, for the frequencies of the electron before and after interaction with the atom are different and there can consequently be no coherence of the scattered waves.
Abstract The work about to be described is a continuation of an investigation begun by one of us at Princeton, New Jersey, on the scattering of electrons by gas atoms. The conditions there were so chosen that only single collisions were taken into account, and it was possible to investigate not only the energy loss on collision, as in the Franck and Hertz experiments, but also the direction of the path of the electron after collision. By employing a magnetic analysis of the velocity of the electron after impact it was found possible to obtain information as to the probability of excitation of various stationary states of the atom considered, on collision with electrons of much higher velocities than could previously be used. The curves relating scattered intensity with angle of scattering were found to have sharp maxima, which were strongly suggestive of diffraction maxima, as might be expected if the motion of electrons is governed by the wave mechanics. But whereas the wave mechanics has been eminently successful in explaining the scattering results of Davisson and Germer with single metal crystals, and of Thomson and Rupp with thin metal foils the results of Dymond have been inexplicable on this basis. It may be said at once that we have been unable to find any trace of the sharp maxima found by him in I, which were apparently due to a secondary cause. Indeed, as has recently been pointed out by Elsasser, no interference effects can be expected, when the electron loses energy on collision, the case in which Dymond found maxima, for the frequencies of the electron before and after interaction with the atom are different and there can consequently be no coherence of the scattered waves.
Abstract The new wave mechanics has been eminently successful in correlating and accounting for the large amount of experimental data on the periodic properties of the atom. The applications of the new theory to aperiodic phenomena, though not nearly so numerous, have been attended with no less success; indeed, it is in these experiments on free electrons, in which diffraction patterns similar to those produced by beams of X-rays and light are obtained, that the wave nature of electrons is so clearly and objectively demonstrated. Such diffraction effects have been obtained by a number of investigators by scattering beams of homogeneous electrons in crystals, thin films and by a ruled grating. Similar effects are obtained when electrons are scattered by complex molecules, owing to the symmetrically situated nuclei in the molecular structure, and when α-particles are scattered by helium owing to interference between the waves of the scattered incident particles and recoiling helium nuclei.
Among the secondary effects produced in an X-ray, or cathode ray tube, there is one which is of special interest to physicists because it seems to throw some light on the question as to the nature of an electron. It appears that when a pencil of cathode rays falls upon the surface of a metal crystal, some of the rays are reflected, or “scattered,” and that the intensity of the scattered rays is greatest in certain directions, so that on a photographic plate placed to receive them, a diffraction pattern is produced as with X rays. The experiment proves that electrons, which were till recently supposed to be merely “particles,” really consist (like X rays), of waves, or at any rate have waves associated with them. It is to these waves associated with electrons, or “electron waves” as they are called, that I propose to devote my remarks this evening. The effect was first observed experimentally in 1927, by Davisson and Germer, who reflected cathode rays from a nickel crystal and, using an electrical method of detection, found maxima of intensity in certain directions. From the positions of the maxima and the known spacing constants of nickel they were able to deduce the wave-length of the electron waves. Later in the same year Professor G. P. Thomson obtained similar effects by transmitting cathode rays through thin metal films and receiving them on a photographic plate.
Abstract The possibility of demonstrating the spin of the electron directly has been discussed since the first growth of wave mechanical conceptions, and the ascription of a magnetic moment to the electron to explain doubling of spectral lines. Bohr has shown, however, that any experiment designed to do this by deflection in a magnetic field, in any manner similar to that used by Gerlach and Stem to measure the magnetic moment of atoms, must fail owing to the operation of the Uncertainty Principle. It does not seem, however, that this will hinder us from demonstrating an asymmetry in the electron by means of scattering experiments; the method is closely analogous to the asymmetric scattering of polarised light, and was in fact used by Barkla to show the polarisation of X-rays. The earlier experiments which were carried out on the polarisation of electrons by Wolf, by Joffé and Arsenieva and by Davisson and Germer all led to negative results. The very careful work of Davisson and Germer should be specially mentioned, in that they reflected electrons from the faces of single crystals at angles corresponding to coherent scattering of the waves. Working up to a velocity of 120 volts they found no asymmetry in the scattering more than ½ per cent., which was within the limit of error of the apparatus. Darwin has shown, however, that no polarisation is to be expected in this type of experiment.
Abstract 1. M. L. de Broglie has introduced a theory of mechanics according to which a moving particle behaves as a group of waves whose velocity and wave-length are governed by the speed and mass of the particle. In fact if m0 is the mass for slow speed and v the speed of a freely moving particle, the wave-length is given by λ = h√1-v2/c2 / m0v, and the wave velocity V by V = c2/v, the group velocity being v, the velocity of the particle. Here c is the velocity of light and it will be seen that the wave velocity is greater than c. There is nothing impossible in this because the waves are regarded as purely geometrical —“phase waves”—not as carrying energy. Compare, in ordinary optical theory, the case of substances, such as sodium, for which the refractive index is less than unity. The above is for free space; in the presence of a field of force V varies, and the consequent bending of the waves by refraction corresponds, on the new theory, to the deviation of the path of the particle by the field of force, on the old. The consequences of this theory have been worked out by de Broglie, Schrödinger and others and applied to problems in spectroscopy where they have provided the solution of several outstanding difficulties left by the older theory of orbits. In view, however, of the extremely fundamental nature of the theory it is highly desirable that it should rest on more direct evidence, and, in particular, that it should be shown capable of predicting as well as of merely explaining. Dymond has obtained some remarkable results on the scattering of slow electrons in helium which are of the general nature to be expected in this theory, but our knowledge of the structure of helium, together with the mathematical difficulties of the problem have so far prevented any exact comparision of the theory with experiment. Davisson and Kunsman and Davisson and Germer have obtained results on the reflection of slow electrons from the surfaces of crystals, especially nickel, which show good qualitative agreement with the theory but a discrepancy of 30 per cent. in certain magnitudes. It is hoped that the experiments described in this paper will advance the matter a stage further. They are a development of some experiments of which a preliminary account appeared recently in ‘Nature.’
Abstract The interference of electrons is now a well established fact. It has been shown that when a homogeneous beam of electrons falls upon a regular arrangement of scattering centres, such as a crystal, a ruled grating, or a complex gaseous molecule, the angular distribution of the scattered electrons shows interference maxima and minima. The analagous, though distinct, phenomonon of the diffraction of electrons has, however, only recently been demonstrated. Evidence of the diffraction of electrons was first obtained about two years ago by Bullard and Massey, and the author. While investigating the angular distribution of elastically scattered electrons in mercury vapour I found well-marked maxima and minima. In this case the scattering was produced, not by an ordered arrangement of scattering centres, but by a random distribution of atoms. It has been shown theoretically that the results obtained can be satisfactorily explained on the assumption of scattering by a single centre, and consequently they represent a true diffraction effect.
Abstract An outstanding defect of the old quantum theory was its inability to treat the phenomena occurring in the collision of electrons with atoms, and Born’s theory showed how the new quantum mechanics was capable of removing this defect. The original theory of Born was a method of successive approximations to the solution of the wave equation representing the colliding systems, and could be applied to both elastic and inelastic collisions. In its actual applications, which could be worked out to the first approximation, the theory fell far short of expectations. The Ramsauer effect, the most interesting phenomenon exhibited in the elastic scattering of electrons, could not be explained, and in the field of inelastic collisions, it failed to provide a means of explaining the excitation of levels of a term system which does not combine with the ground state system, e. g., the excitation of the triplet lines of helium. These failures are, of course, failures of the theory in its first approximation. The first approximation in Born’s method of successive approximations neglected the disturbance of the electron waves by the field of the scatterer, and also the possibility of exchange of electrons between the atoms and the colliding beam. The neglect of both these effects becomes important for low velocity impacts, and it was clear that the Ramsauer effect, which is only observed for low velocity electrons, could only be explained by more accurate theory. The question was whether both effects, the distortion of the electron waves by the atomic field, and the exchange of electrons was important, or only one of them.