Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics

Problem of centers of mass within the problem of the contour of spectral lines. 1. Existence of long trajectories

Stanislav D. Tvorogov

Published Jun 1, 2009• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The issue of the renunciation of the long-wave approximation for the centers of mass of molecules in the derivation of the formula for the absorption coefficient is discussed. In this case, in the formula for the absorption coefficient additional operators related to the field wave vector and to the coordinates of the center of mass appear. Their presence results in the appearance of relationships between the absorption coefficients and shifted frequencies; these relationships are called sum rules. Formulas for them in terms of commutators of additional operators with the Hamiltonian of the light-absorbing molecule have been derived. A “drift” hypothesis is presented, which describes the appearance of “long” trajectories going beyond the elementary volume.

DOI
10.1134/s1024856009030014

Related papers

Photon absorption

Monique Combescot, Shiue-Yuan Shiau

Abstract The chapter « Photon absorption » tackles a fundamental question: as excitons with a given center-of-mass wave vector are well separated in energy at the exciton Rydberg scale, while the Fermi golden rule requires a final-state continuum to be valid, photons cannot be absorbed in a semiconductor along this rule. An extrinsic exciton broadening must exist for photons to be absorbed. This chapter also discusses the possibility to go beyond the Fermi golden rule, as this rule fundamentally is second order in coupling.

•Aug 5, 2026•0 citations

Perturbation theory in quantum mechanics—II

Alan Herries Wilson

Abstract In a previous paper the theory of perturbations was discussed for system which possess only discrete spectra. The theory is now extended to systems with both discrete and continuous spectra, and in addition a slightly more general method of perturbation is considered. The Hamiltonian H of the perturbed systems is split up into three parts H0, H1, H2 (t), two of which can be chosen arbitrarily. The solutions of the perturbed problem can then be worked out in terms of the characteristic functions corresponding to the Hamiltonian H0 + H2 (T), where T is any arbitrary fixed time. In general, however, the series of perturbations does not converge, and different modes of splitting up the Hamiltonian will lead to different formal results. The perturbation theory does usually give the correct physical results, and it is therefore necessary to give some explanation of how this happens. In (I) the asymptotic nature of certain solutions was emphasised, but this does not extend to the more general systems treated here. It is suggested that the usual boundary conditions do not give an adequate description of any but the simplest atomic problems, and that more detailed restrictions, determined by the experimental conditions, ought to be substituted. As this is impossible in practice, an alternative method is to regard the motion as a perturbation on that Hamiltonian H0 + H2 (T) which most nearly corresponds to the experimental conditions. (For example, we may regard an electron as free or bound according as the experiment determines the number of free or bound electrons respectively, whereas in the usual theory the initial Hamiltonian is taken as fundamental.) This criterion, together with the initial conditions, suffices to fix the division of H into the three parts H0, H1, H2 (t) which at first were chosen arbitrarily. The formal solution can be worked out on this basis, and it is then assumed that this solution is asymptotic to the one which would be obtained if the full boundary conditions were used. This suggestion is in accordance with the fact that a hydrogen atom in an electric field gives rise not only to the usual Stark effect, but also to an ionisation effect. In § 2 the perturbation equation are derived in a slightly more general form than has previously been given. The theories of Born,* Dirac and Oppenheimer are particular cases of that given here, and are obtained by particular choices of H0, H1, H2 (t). To obtain Born’s theory we take H1 = 0, and for Oppenheimer’s we take H2 (t) = H2 (T) and T = 0. In Dirac’s theory we have H1 = 0, H2 (0) = 0 and T = 0. Each of these theories is appropriate for the solution of special problems, but the more general method of this paper is required for the full discussion of the perturbation theory.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character•May 2, 1929•5 citations

Resonance Broadening of Spectral Lines

C. Alden Mead

A formalism introduced previously by the author is used to calculate the shape of an absorption line in a gas, taking account of the "resonance" interaction between like atoms. The most serious approximation is the neglect of the effect of translational motion. An asymmetric line is obtained, with the maximum shifted slightly toward the red. Some simple classical considerations also agree qualitatively with the results. Various properties of the line shape obtained are briefly discussed. The neglect of translational motion makes it impossible to compare the results with experiments performed up to the present time.

Physical Review•Nov 1, 1960•6 citations

Eine Lösungstheorie für das quantenmechanische Vier-Körper-Problem

W Büttner, H. Ruder

Abstract A system of 4 point masses (without spin) is considered. The potential energy is assumed to be a function of the distances between the particles only. It is possible to express the kinetic energy relative to the center of mass as the kinetic energy of 3 "reduced" masses. The different possibilities for that procedure are discussed for systems with an arbitrary number of particles. The positions of the 3 reduced masses are described by 9 coordinates. 6 of them, the "internal" coordinates, are needed to determine the internal structure of the system, and 3, the "external" coordinates, for its orientation in space. The classical Hamiltonian in such a set of coordinates is derived. In a first step the Hamiltonian is expressed in terms of linear and angular momenta. Then these quantities are determined as functions of the coordinates and the conjugate momenta by infinitesimal trans-formations. From the classical Hamiltonian we get the quantum mechanical one by the well-known translation rule. It can be expressed in terms of the linear and angular momentum operators quite analogous to the classical case. For the solution of the time-independent Schrödinger equation the rotational symmetry of the system is used. The wave function is expanded in terms of the eigenfunctions of the total angular momentum. This leads to a system of coupled differential equations for the expansion-coefficients which depend on the 6 internal coordinates only. The further symmetries of the system (reflection and particle exchange) appear in symmetry properties of these functions. Differences and similarities in the solution theory for the 4-body-problem with respect to the 3-body-problem are discussed.

Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Aug 1, 1969•2 citations

The Wave Mechanics of an Atom with a Non-Coulomb Central Field. Part IV. Further Results relating to Terms of the Optical Spectrum

Douglas Rayner Hartree

The purpose of this note is to extend in two respects some previous work of the writer on the wave equation of a particle in a central field of force which is a Coulomb field for sufficiently large r.

Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society•Jul 1, 1929•30 citations

Coordinate measurements and operators

Arthur A. Broyles

Abstract Relativistic quantum‐field theory provides the machinery for calculating wave functions or probability amplitudes depending upon space‐time coordinates. The currently accepted theory, however, fails to provide position operators and a means of measuring particle coordinates that are consistent with Dirac's properties of physical observables. This is because it calls for a space position probability distribution at a specified time. This paper shows, however, that space‐time event coordinate operators, together with a corresponding measurement procedure, can be found that are consistent with Dirac's requirements. This is done through a reinterpretation of the amplitudes computed by field theory and does not involve any change in that mathematical formalism. The measurement of the space‐time coordinates of an event is accomplished by detecting the absorption of a photon by a particle from each of two light pulses designed to overlap at a given point at a given time. If a final emitted photon has an energy whose sum with the final particle energy approximately equals the sum of the mean energies of the pulses, then the absorption of the two pulse photons must certainly have taken place within a distance the order of a Compton wavelength of the small space‐time region of overlapping pulses. This is clear from the fact that the high energy required to confine the pulses to very small volumes must throw a particle absorbing them far off the mass shell. Thus the absorption of the two photons throws the particle into a narrowly confined spatial wave function that must decay extremely rapidly—to within a Compton wavelength, a delta function in space‐time. This delta function is the eigenfunction of space‐time coordinate operators Xμ and is the scalar product of vectors in a Hilbert space spanned by spin–space‐time kets large enough to contain the operators of the Poincaré group. These event operators transform properly under the action of Poincaré operators but do not commute with the mass. If the Compton wavelength is not negligible compared to the accuracy desired in the coordinate measurements, individual coordinate measurements are no longer possible. Nevertheless, a large number of repeated coordinate measurements can be carried out to produce a coordinate probability distribution. This distribution can be unfolded to find a true coordinate probability distribution if the charge form factor is known from basic theory. An analysis of laboratory particle detection techniques shows that they actually determine space coordinates and energy rather than spatial coordinates at a given time. When this fact is included, the Klein–Nishina formula can be derived using the electromagnetic four‐vector potential as the photon probability amplitude wave. To clarify the meaning of the observables, a mass‐momentum measurement is described.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 1, 1980•4 citations
The issue of the renunciation of the long-wave approximation for the centers of mass of molecules in the derivation of the formula for the absorption coefficient is discussed. In this case, in the formula for the absorption coefficient additional operators related to the field wave vector and to the coordinates of the center of mass appear. Their presence results in the appearance of relationships between the absorption coefficients and shifted frequencies; these relationships are called sum rules. Formulas for them in terms of commutators of additional operators with the Hamiltonian of the light-absorbing molecule have been derived. A “drift” hypothesis is presented, which describes the appearance of “long” trajectories going beyond the elementary volume.
Abstract The chapter « Photon absorption » tackles a fundamental question: as excitons with a given center-of-mass wave vector are well separated in energy at the exciton Rydberg scale, while the Fermi golden rule requires a final-state continuum to be valid, photons cannot be absorbed in a semiconductor along this rule. An extrinsic exciton broadening must exist for photons to be absorbed. This chapter also discusses the possibility to go beyond the Fermi golden rule, as this rule fundamentally is second order in coupling.
Abstract In a previous paper the theory of perturbations was discussed for system which possess only discrete spectra. The theory is now extended to systems with both discrete and continuous spectra, and in addition a slightly more general method of perturbation is considered. The Hamiltonian H of the perturbed systems is split up into three parts H0, H1, H2 (t), two of which can be chosen arbitrarily. The solutions of the perturbed problem can then be worked out in terms of the characteristic functions corresponding to the Hamiltonian H0 + H2 (T), where T is any arbitrary fixed time. In general, however, the series of perturbations does not converge, and different modes of splitting up the Hamiltonian will lead to different formal results. The perturbation theory does usually give the correct physical results, and it is therefore necessary to give some explanation of how this happens. In (I) the asymptotic nature of certain solutions was emphasised, but this does not extend to the more general systems treated here. It is suggested that the usual boundary conditions do not give an adequate description of any but the simplest atomic problems, and that more detailed restrictions, determined by the experimental conditions, ought to be substituted. As this is impossible in practice, an alternative method is to regard the motion as a perturbation on that Hamiltonian H0 + H2 (T) which most nearly corresponds to the experimental conditions. (For example, we may regard an electron as free or bound according as the experiment determines the number of free or bound electrons respectively, whereas in the usual theory the initial Hamiltonian is taken as fundamental.) This criterion, together with the initial conditions, suffices to fix the division of H into the three parts H0, H1, H2 (t) which at first were chosen arbitrarily. The formal solution can be worked out on this basis, and it is then assumed that this solution is asymptotic to the one which would be obtained if the full boundary conditions were used. This suggestion is in accordance with the fact that a hydrogen atom in an electric field gives rise not only to the usual Stark effect, but also to an ionisation effect. In § 2 the perturbation equation are derived in a slightly more general form than has previously been given. The theories of Born,* Dirac and Oppenheimer are particular cases of that given here, and are obtained by particular choices of H0, H1, H2 (t). To obtain Born’s theory we take H1 = 0, and for Oppenheimer’s we take H2 (t) = H2 (T) and T = 0. In Dirac’s theory we have H1 = 0, H2 (0) = 0 and T = 0. Each of these theories is appropriate for the solution of special problems, but the more general method of this paper is required for the full discussion of the perturbation theory.
A formalism introduced previously by the author is used to calculate the shape of an absorption line in a gas, taking account of the "resonance" interaction between like atoms. The most serious approximation is the neglect of the effect of translational motion. An asymmetric line is obtained, with the maximum shifted slightly toward the red. Some simple classical considerations also agree qualitatively with the results. Various properties of the line shape obtained are briefly discussed. The neglect of translational motion makes it impossible to compare the results with experiments performed up to the present time.
Abstract A system of 4 point masses (without spin) is considered. The potential energy is assumed to be a function of the distances between the particles only. It is possible to express the kinetic energy relative to the center of mass as the kinetic energy of 3 "reduced" masses. The different possibilities for that procedure are discussed for systems with an arbitrary number of particles. The positions of the 3 reduced masses are described by 9 coordinates. 6 of them, the "internal" coordinates, are needed to determine the internal structure of the system, and 3, the "external" coordinates, for its orientation in space. The classical Hamiltonian in such a set of coordinates is derived. In a first step the Hamiltonian is expressed in terms of linear and angular momenta. Then these quantities are determined as functions of the coordinates and the conjugate momenta by infinitesimal trans-formations. From the classical Hamiltonian we get the quantum mechanical one by the well-known translation rule. It can be expressed in terms of the linear and angular momentum operators quite analogous to the classical case. For the solution of the time-independent Schrödinger equation the rotational symmetry of the system is used. The wave function is expanded in terms of the eigenfunctions of the total angular momentum. This leads to a system of coupled differential equations for the expansion-coefficients which depend on the 6 internal coordinates only. The further symmetries of the system (reflection and particle exchange) appear in symmetry properties of these functions. Differences and similarities in the solution theory for the 4-body-problem with respect to the 3-body-problem are discussed.
Abstract Relativistic quantum‐field theory provides the machinery for calculating wave functions or probability amplitudes depending upon space‐time coordinates. The currently accepted theory, however, fails to provide position operators and a means of measuring particle coordinates that are consistent with Dirac's properties of physical observables. This is because it calls for a space position probability distribution at a specified time. This paper shows, however, that space‐time event coordinate operators, together with a corresponding measurement procedure, can be found that are consistent with Dirac's requirements. This is done through a reinterpretation of the amplitudes computed by field theory and does not involve any change in that mathematical formalism. The measurement of the space‐time coordinates of an event is accomplished by detecting the absorption of a photon by a particle from each of two light pulses designed to overlap at a given point at a given time. If a final emitted photon has an energy whose sum with the final particle energy approximately equals the sum of the mean energies of the pulses, then the absorption of the two pulse photons must certainly have taken place within a distance the order of a Compton wavelength of the small space‐time region of overlapping pulses. This is clear from the fact that the high energy required to confine the pulses to very small volumes must throw a particle absorbing them far off the mass shell. Thus the absorption of the two photons throws the particle into a narrowly confined spatial wave function that must decay extremely rapidly—to within a Compton wavelength, a delta function in space‐time. This delta function is the eigenfunction of space‐time coordinate operators Xμ and is the scalar product of vectors in a Hilbert space spanned by spin–space‐time kets large enough to contain the operators of the Poincaré group. These event operators transform properly under the action of Poincaré operators but do not commute with the mass. If the Compton wavelength is not negligible compared to the accuracy desired in the coordinate measurements, individual coordinate measurements are no longer possible. Nevertheless, a large number of repeated coordinate measurements can be carried out to produce a coordinate probability distribution. This distribution can be unfolded to find a true coordinate probability distribution if the charge form factor is known from basic theory. An analysis of laboratory particle detection techniques shows that they actually determine space coordinates and energy rather than spatial coordinates at a given time. When this fact is included, the Klein–Nishina formula can be derived using the electromagnetic four‐vector potential as the photon probability amplitude wave. To clarify the meaning of the observables, a mass‐momentum measurement is described.