Quantum mechanics is very puzzling. A particle can be delocalized, it can be simultaneously in several energy states and it can even have several different identities at once. This schizophrenic behavior is encoded in its wavefunction, which can always be written as a superposition of quantum states, each characterized by a complex probability amplitude. Interferences between these amplitudes occur when the particle can follow several indistinguishable paths. Any attempt to determine which trajectory it “actually takes” destroys these interferences. This is a manifestation of wave—particle complementarity, which has recently been illustrated in textbook fashion by several beautiful experiments.
Quantum mechanics is very puzzling. A particle can be delocalized, it can be simultaneously in several energy states and it can even have several different identities at once. This schizophrenic behavior is encoded in its wavefunction, which can always be written as a superposition of quantum states, each characterized by a complex probability amplitude. Interferences between these amplitudes occur when the particle can follow several indistinguishable paths. Any attempt to determine which trajectory it “actually takes” destroys these interferences. This is a manifestation of wave—particle complementarity, which has recently been illustrated in textbook fashion by several beautiful experiments.
Abstract Two or more particles which have interacted in the past, may in general maintain nontrivial quantum mechanical correlations, described by non-factorized wave functions. These correlations, under optimal conditions, can manifest themselves no matter how far they travel away from each other and even when the separate parts cannot dynamically influence each other, leading to apparently paradoxical situations. These correlations are known as quantum entanglement. However counter-intuitive and surprising it may sometimes look, it is rather one of the more beautiful and experimentally well established predictions of quantum mechanics.
Summary form only given. The transition between quantum and classical systems is usually ascribed to decoherence effects, which become increasingly important for larger size systems and tend to obscure the quantum behavior. Decoherence effects also come into play in the famous thought 'Gedanken' experiments on the wave-particle duality of matter. For example, in a double slit experiment with electrons, a wavepacket passes simultaneously through both slits and forms an interference pattern. However, if one attempts to keep track of the electron path, e.g., by scattering a photon from the electron, the resulting decoherence destroys the interference pattern and the particle behavior takes over. We report on the extension of such a which-path experiment to an arrangement with more than two interfering paths, which is realized using the interference of four internal states of the cesium atom. This two-qubits arrangement represents a more complex quantum system than a two-beam interferometer, which represents a single qubit system. While in a two-beam interference experiment the observation of a path will inevitable destroy the fringe signal, we demonstrate that the scattering of a photon on one of the path of a multiple path arrangement cannot only lead to a decrease of the contrast, but, under certain conditions, also lead to an increase of the fringe contrast.
In 1948, Schwinger developed a local Lorentz-covariant formulation of relativistic quantum electrodynamics in space-time which is fundamentally inconsistent with any delocalized interpretation of quantum mechanics. An interpretation compatible with Schwinger’s theory is presented, which reproduces all of the standard empirical predictions of conventional delocalized quantum theory in configuration space. This is an explicit, unambiguous, and Lorentz-covariant “local hidden variable theory” in space-time, whose existence proves definitively that such theories are possible. This does not conflict with Bell’s theorem because it is a local many-worlds theory. Each physical system is characterized by a wave-field, which is a set of indexed piece-wise single-particle wavefunctions in space-time, each with its own coefficient, along with a memory which contains the separate local Hilbert-space quantum state at each event in space-time. Each single-particle wavefunction of a fundamental system describes the motion of a portion of a conserved fluid in space-time, with the fluid decomposing into many classical point particles, each following a world-line and recording a local memory. Local interactions between two systems take the form of local boundary conditions between the differently indexed pieces of those systems’ wave-fields, with new indexes encoding each orthogonal outcome of the interaction. The general machinery is introduced, including the local mechanisms for entanglement and interference. The experience of collapse, Born rule probability, and environmental decoherence are discussed, and a number of illustrative examples are given.
We are in the midst of a renaissance in the study and interpretation of fundamental quantum mechanics, from quantum coherence and quantum entanglement to the quantum measurement process. This stems partly from the impressive advances in experimental techniques that are making yesterday's gedanken experiment today's reality. Another reason quantum coherence and entanglement have come to the forefront is the emerging and tantalizing field of quantum information science. The ability to store information in quantum systems may someday yield devices that process quantum superpositions of inputs in parallel or improve communication through the `wiring' implicit in quantum entanglement. Indeed, quantum computing has the remote prospect of revolutionizing the way we store and process information. This has become particularly important in the face of impending limits on the miniaturization of conventional computers due to quantum effects. Of course, all real systems face limits imposed by decoherence, or the environmentally-induced destruction of quantum coherence. Here, superpositions of quantum states suddenly become probabilistic mixtures of states when they interact with the environment or when the system parameters are fluctuating. Decoherence theory is commonly interpreted as a way to quantify the elusive boundary between quantum and classical worlds and almost always precludes the existence of complex quantum superpositions, except at extremely short time scales. In practice, it is very important to study how decoherence appears in particular quantum systems and try to fight against it. In this special issue of Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics , we highlight recent results in the exciting area of quantum coherence and entanglement, including generating interesting and complex quantum states, characterizing coherence and entanglement in these systems, and triumphing over relevant decoherence processes. We hope this issue will not only act as a bookmark in the ongoing study of fundamental quantum mechanics, but will also help guide the rapid developments in quantum information science.
This chapter introduces quantum mechanics through the experimental discoveries that revealed the limits of classical physics. Beginning with the historical debate over whether light is a wave or a particle, it examines Young’s double-slit experiment and its modern single-particle versions, which demonstrate that quantum objects can exist in superpositions of mutually exclusive states. The chapter explains how interference arises when alternative possibilities are not measured and how interaction with the environment suppresses these effects through decoherence, giving rise to classical behavior at macroscopic scales. A sequence of thought experiments involving interferometers and Stern–Gerlach devices highlights the counterintuitive structure of quantum measurement and the incompatibility of certain physical properties, as captured by the uncertainty principle. The chapter emphasizes that quantum mechanics does not describe particles taking multiple paths simultaneously in a classical sense but rather requires a new framework for probability based on amplitudes and interference. Finally, the discussion connects these foundational ideas to emerging technologies such as quantum computing, showing how superposition and entanglement can be harnessed to perform computations that have no classical analogue.
Abstract The results of the experiments described in the last chapter all point fairly unambiguously to a reality that is decidedly non-local in nature, at least in the quantum domain. Of course, these are results that come as no surprise to those willing to accept one of the most fundamental principles of the Copenhagen interpretation — that quantum phenomena are describable only in terms of the dual classical physical concepts of waves and particles. The wave properties of quantum entities lend them inherently non-local characteristics, and it is only when we forcibly ‘collapse’ the wave function by making a measurement that we are taken aback by what appears to be contradictory or counter-intuitive behaviour.