American Journal of Physics

Re: Schlegel's Bohrian Reply to EPR: A Comment

C. A. Hooker

Published Apr 1, 1972• 1 citation

Publisher

DOI: 10.1119/1.1988077

Related papers

Reply to “ A critical analysis of N. Bohr's reply to the EPR argument”

Jes Madsen

Physics Letters AMay 1, 19811 citation

The EPR Experiment: A Prelude to Bohr’s Reply to EPR

Michael Dickson

Springer eBooksJan 1, 200210 citations

Quantum Reference Frames in the Context of EPR

Michael Dickson

Taking a cue from Bohr's use of the notion of a reference frame in his reply to EPR's argument against the completeness (and consistency) of standard quantum theory, this paper presents an analysis ofthe role of reference frames in the situation considered by EPR, using a quantum-theoretical account of physical reference frames based on the work of Mackey, and Aharonov and Kaufherr. That analysis appears to justify at least some crucial aspects of a Bohrian reply to EPR.

Philosophy of ScienceDec 1, 20046 citations

A Phenomenological Analysis of the EPR Argument

Vincenzo Fano

Springer eBooksJan 1, 19880 citations

Re “Reality in Physics” by Richard Schlegel

H. J. MacPhee

American Journal of PhysicsNov 1, 19731 citation

Comment on `Is the EPR paradox really a paradox?'

Roland Onmès

European Journal of PhysicsJan 1, 19990 citations