Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference

Some quantum optics perspectives on decoherence in quantum computers

Julio R. Gea-Banacloche

Published Jun 25, 2003• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Summary form only given. When the quantum nature of the optical field used to drive a qubit is taken into account, entanglement between the qubit and the field becomes a possible source of error which has been the subject of some attention lately. Although many other sources of noise will typically be much more important, this kind of error may actually have consequences for very large-scale quantum computations. A way to get around the entanglement problem is discussed.

DOI
10.1109/qels.2002.1031385

Related papers

Some implications of the quantum nature of laser fields for quantum computations

Julio R. Gea-Banacloche

The quantum nature of the laser fields used in many proposed schemes for the manipulation of quantum information may have important consequences for some very large scale quantum computations. Some of these consequences are explored here, focusing especially on phase errors and their effects on error-correction schemes. Depending on the way the logical gates are performed, constraints are found on either the required number of photons per coherence time put out by the laser source, or the source's power

Physical Review A•Jan 4, 2002•60 citations

Quantum Error Correction

Radhika Vathsan

Bits as well as qubits are affected by noise in transmission, the process of computation or even storage. We will refer to the error-prone area as a channel. The error is introduced by unwanted but unavoidable interaction with the rest of the world and needs to be corrected before the data can be reliable. Classically this is important in communication systems and there is a whole thriving field of study of classical error correction. In quantum systems, states are intrinsically so fragile that unless they are impossibly isolated from the rest of the world, errors or noise would make computation or communication using them infeasible. Fortunately, it was discovered early in the history of this subject that it is possible to encode qubits in special ways so as to make the information resilient to errors. The qubits are decoded at the end of the computation/communication (schematic of Figure 10.1).

CRC Press eBooks•Aug 24, 2015•0 citations

Adiabatic geometric phase gate with a quantized control field

Shabnam Siddiqui, Julio R. Gea-Banacloche

We study the performance of an adiabatic geometric phase gate with a quantized driving field numerically and develop an analytical approximation that shows how the qubit becomes entangled with the driving field. This results in a scaling of the gate error probability versus the energy in the control field that has the same form as that found for dynamic, nonadiabatic gates, but with a prefactor that would typically be several orders of magnitude larger, because of the adiabaticity constraint. In the approximation we have used, which should be valid for sufficiently large control fields, the main source of decoherence (and hence error) is the ``which path'' information carried by the photons that would be radiated by the driven qubit.

Physical Review A•Nov 30, 2006•9 citations

Recent Aspect of Entanglement with Applications in Quantum Optics and Quantum Information Theory

TINA ANNA CATTOLICA MAIOLO, L. Martina, GIOVANNA RUGGERI +1 more

In this review article some fundamental aspects on the application of entanglement running from quantum optics to some issues of quantum information, are presented.

•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Quantum coherence and entanglement

R. Blatt, Christopher R. Monroe, Paolo Tombesi

We are in the midst of a renaissance in the study and interpretation of fundamental quantum mechanics, from quantum coherence and quantum entanglement to the quantum measurement process. This stems partly from the impressive advances in experimental techniques that are making yesterday's gedanken experiment today's reality. Another reason quantum coherence and entanglement have come to the forefront is the emerging and tantalizing field of quantum information science. The ability to store information in quantum systems may someday yield devices that process quantum superpositions of inputs in parallel or improve communication through the `wiring' implicit in quantum entanglement. Indeed, quantum computing has the remote prospect of revolutionizing the way we store and process information. This has become particularly important in the face of impending limits on the miniaturization of conventional computers due to quantum effects. Of course, all real systems face limits imposed by decoherence, or the environmentally-induced destruction of quantum coherence. Here, superpositions of quantum states suddenly become probabilistic mixtures of states when they interact with the environment or when the system parameters are fluctuating. Decoherence theory is commonly interpreted as a way to quantify the elusive boundary between quantum and classical worlds and almost always precludes the existence of complex quantum superpositions, except at extremely short time scales. In practice, it is very important to study how decoherence appears in particular quantum systems and try to fight against it. In this special issue of Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics , we highlight recent results in the exciting area of quantum coherence and entanglement, including generating interesting and complex quantum states, characterizing coherence and entanglement in these systems, and triumphing over relevant decoherence processes. We hope this issue will not only act as a bookmark in the ongoing study of fundamental quantum mechanics, but will also help guide the rapid developments in quantum information science.

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Feb 19, 2001•2 citations

An Examination of Different Kinds of Quantum Computing Technologies

Karan Chawla

One of the main drivers for growing the field of quantum computation has been the prospect of creating a quantum computer capable of carrying out Shor's algorithm for huge numbers.Nonetheless, it is critical to recognise that quantum computers will probably only significantly speed up a small subset of issues if one wants to acquire a more comprehensive perspective on them.Building a system that can accommodate a lot of qubits while preserving stability and coherence is one of the biggest problems in quantum computing.Due to their extreme sensitivity to noise and mistakes, quantum systems are particularly susceptible to computing errors.Building a usable quantum computer requires error mitigation and correction, but the techniques for doing this are still in the early phases of research.In quantum computing, all processes and schemes must be reversible in accordance with the law of unitary development.The circuit model is taken into account in the NISQ framework, but there is also the one-way or measurement-based quantum computation approach, which is not reversible but is demonstrated to be comparable to the circuit model.Noisy suggests that the computing capacity of such quantum computers is constrained because of sufficiently high error and decoherence rates.While they are likely too huge to be replicated by traditional computers using brute force, Intermediate-Scale suggests that they are still too small to be mistake corrected, which also adds to the preceding argument about how noisy they are.P stands for the usage of perfect qubits with perfect quantum gates and no decoherence.The capability to control and protect our qubits in a quantum computer to the degree necessary to run such algorithms is commonly described as fault-tolerant quantum computation.This review paper examines the numerous quantum computing strategies, such as Noisy Intermediate Scale Computing (NISQ) , Perfect Intermediate Scale Computing (PISQ), and Fault Tolerant Intermediate Scale Computing (FTISQ), as well as potential future lines of inquiry.

International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research•Apr 27, 2023•0 citations
Summary form only given. When the quantum nature of the optical field used to drive a qubit is taken into account, entanglement between the qubit and the field becomes a possible source of error which has been the subject of some attention lately. Although many other sources of noise will typically be much more important, this kind of error may actually have consequences for very large-scale quantum computations. A way to get around the entanglement problem is discussed.
The quantum nature of the laser fields used in many proposed schemes for the manipulation of quantum information may have important consequences for some very large scale quantum computations. Some of these consequences are explored here, focusing especially on phase errors and their effects on error-correction schemes. Depending on the way the logical gates are performed, constraints are found on either the required number of photons per coherence time put out by the laser source, or the source's power
Bits as well as qubits are affected by noise in transmission, the process of computation or even storage. We will refer to the error-prone area as a channel. The error is introduced by unwanted but unavoidable interaction with the rest of the world and needs to be corrected before the data can be reliable. Classically this is important in communication systems and there is a whole thriving field of study of classical error correction. In quantum systems, states are intrinsically so fragile that unless they are impossibly isolated from the rest of the world, errors or noise would make computation or communication using them infeasible. Fortunately, it was discovered early in the history of this subject that it is possible to encode qubits in special ways so as to make the information resilient to errors. The qubits are decoded at the end of the computation/communication (schematic of Figure 10.1).
We study the performance of an adiabatic geometric phase gate with a quantized driving field numerically and develop an analytical approximation that shows how the qubit becomes entangled with the driving field. This results in a scaling of the gate error probability versus the energy in the control field that has the same form as that found for dynamic, nonadiabatic gates, but with a prefactor that would typically be several orders of magnitude larger, because of the adiabaticity constraint. In the approximation we have used, which should be valid for sufficiently large control fields, the main source of decoherence (and hence error) is the ``which path'' information carried by the photons that would be radiated by the driven qubit.
We are in the midst of a renaissance in the study and interpretation of fundamental quantum mechanics, from quantum coherence and quantum entanglement to the quantum measurement process. This stems partly from the impressive advances in experimental techniques that are making yesterday's gedanken experiment today's reality. Another reason quantum coherence and entanglement have come to the forefront is the emerging and tantalizing field of quantum information science. The ability to store information in quantum systems may someday yield devices that process quantum superpositions of inputs in parallel or improve communication through the `wiring' implicit in quantum entanglement. Indeed, quantum computing has the remote prospect of revolutionizing the way we store and process information. This has become particularly important in the face of impending limits on the miniaturization of conventional computers due to quantum effects. Of course, all real systems face limits imposed by decoherence, or the environmentally-induced destruction of quantum coherence. Here, superpositions of quantum states suddenly become probabilistic mixtures of states when they interact with the environment or when the system parameters are fluctuating. Decoherence theory is commonly interpreted as a way to quantify the elusive boundary between quantum and classical worlds and almost always precludes the existence of complex quantum superpositions, except at extremely short time scales. In practice, it is very important to study how decoherence appears in particular quantum systems and try to fight against it. In this special issue of Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics , we highlight recent results in the exciting area of quantum coherence and entanglement, including generating interesting and complex quantum states, characterizing coherence and entanglement in these systems, and triumphing over relevant decoherence processes. We hope this issue will not only act as a bookmark in the ongoing study of fundamental quantum mechanics, but will also help guide the rapid developments in quantum information science.
One of the main drivers for growing the field of quantum computation has been the prospect of creating a quantum computer capable of carrying out Shor's algorithm for huge numbers.Nonetheless, it is critical to recognise that quantum computers will probably only significantly speed up a small subset of issues if one wants to acquire a more comprehensive perspective on them.Building a system that can accommodate a lot of qubits while preserving stability and coherence is one of the biggest problems in quantum computing.Due to their extreme sensitivity to noise and mistakes, quantum systems are particularly susceptible to computing errors.Building a usable quantum computer requires error mitigation and correction, but the techniques for doing this are still in the early phases of research.In quantum computing, all processes and schemes must be reversible in accordance with the law of unitary development.The circuit model is taken into account in the NISQ framework, but there is also the one-way or measurement-based quantum computation approach, which is not reversible but is demonstrated to be comparable to the circuit model.Noisy suggests that the computing capacity of such quantum computers is constrained because of sufficiently high error and decoherence rates.While they are likely too huge to be replicated by traditional computers using brute force, Intermediate-Scale suggests that they are still too small to be mistake corrected, which also adds to the preceding argument about how noisy they are.P stands for the usage of perfect qubits with perfect quantum gates and no decoherence.The capability to control and protect our qubits in a quantum computer to the degree necessary to run such algorithms is commonly described as fault-tolerant quantum computation.This review paper examines the numerous quantum computing strategies, such as Noisy Intermediate Scale Computing (NISQ) , Perfect Intermediate Scale Computing (PISQ), and Fault Tolerant Intermediate Scale Computing (FTISQ), as well as potential future lines of inquiry.