Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Modern Optics

Optimal quantum measurements for phase-shift estimation in optical interferometry

Barry C. Sanders, Gerard J Milburn, Zhongxi Zhang

Published Jul 1, 1997• 19 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum information theory, applied to optical interferometry, yields a 1/n scaling of phase uncertainty Δφ independent of the applied phase shift φ, where n is the number of photons in the interferometer. This 1/n scaling is achieved provided that the output state is subjected to an optimal phase measurement. We establish this scaling law for both passive (linear) and active (nonlinear) interferometers and identify the coefficient of proportionality. Whereas a highly nonclassical state is required to achieve optimal scaling for passive interferometry, a classical input state yields a 1/n scaling of phase uncertainty for active interferometry.

DOI
10.1080/09500349708230739

Related papers

Optimal Quantum Measurements for Phase Estimation

Barry C. Sanders, Gerard J Milburn

Quantum information theory is applied to practical interferometer-based phase measurements to deduce the optimal phase measurement scheme with two optical modes. Optimal phase measurements, given ideal input states, reveal an asymptotic $1/n$ decrease in phase uncertainty $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\theta}$ for $n$ the mean photon number of the input state. In contradistinction to previous schemes for realizing the number-phase uncertainty limit, the $1/n$ limit achieved here is independent of the interferometer phase shift; prior information about the expected phase shift is not necessary to attain this limit. These results apply more generally to su(2) and so(3) phase parameter estimation.

Physical Review Letters•Oct 16, 1995•242 citations

Adaptive measurements and optimal states for quantum interferometry

Dominic William Berry, Howard M. Wiseman

Summary form only given. Interferometry is the basis of many high-precision measurements. The ultimate limit to the precision is due to quantum effects. This limit is most easily explored for a Mach-Zehnder interferometer The outputs of this device can be measured to yield an estimate /spl phi/ of the phase difference /spl phi/ between the two arms of the interferometer. It is well known that this can achieve the standard quantum limit for phase variance when an N-photon number state enters one input port. Several authors have proposed ways of reducing the phase variance to the Heisenberg limit. In this paper we show that there is a physical measurement scheme using photodetectors and feedback that is almost as good as the optimal measurement. The fundamental idea is that, in addition to the unknown phase we wish to measure, /spl phi/, in one arm of the interferometer, we introduce a known phase shift, /spl Phi/, into the other arm of the interferometer. After each photodetection we adjust this introduced phase shift in order to minimize the expected uncertainty of our best phase estimate /spl phi/ after the next photodetection. This feedback process is uniquely defined using Bayesian statistics, and can be solved exactly for moderate photon numbers.

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•Nov 13, 2002•2 citations

Bounds to precision for quantum interferometry with Gaussian states and operations

Carlo Sparaciari, Stefano Olivares, Matteo G. A. Paris

We address high-precision measurements by active and passive interferometric schemes based on Gaussian states and operations. In particular, we look for the best states to be injected into their ports according to the quantum Cramer–Rao bound, i.e., maximizing the quantum Fisher information over all the involved parameters, given a constraint on the overall mean number of photons entering into the interferometer. We found that for passive interferometers involving only beam splitters, the optimal input leading to Heisenberg scaling is a pair of identical squeezed-coherent states with at most one-third of the total energy employed in squeezing. For active interferometers involving optical amplifiers, input coherent signals are enough to achieve Heisenberg scaling, given an optimal value of the amplification gain. For passive schemes our results clarify the role of squeezing in improving both the reference phase and the signal phase of an interferometer.

Journal of the Optical Society of America B•Jun 5, 2015•60 citations

Quantum states for Heisenberg-limited interferometry

Hermann Uys, Pierre Meystre

The phase sensitivity of interferometers is limited by the so-called Heisenberg limit, which states that the optimum phase sensitivity is inversely proportional to the number of interfering particles $N$, a $1∕\sqrt{N}$ improvement over the standard quantum limit. We have used simulated annealing, a global optimization strategy, to systematically search for quantum interferometer input states that approach the Heisenberg-limited uncertainty in estimates of the interferometer phase shift. We compare the performance of these states to that of other nonclassical states already known to yield Heisenberg-limited uncertainty.

arXiv:quant-ph/0702170•Physical Review A•Jul 9, 2007•57 citations

Quantum metrology for simultaneously estimating the linear and nonlinear phase shifts

Jing Cheng

Quantum metrology allows the enhanced precision on estimating phase shifts in an optical interferometer to reach the $\ensuremath{\propto}1/N$ scaling of precision ($N$ is the mean photon number of the light field). But when $N$ is very large, the nonlinear optical effects may be nonnegligible. Here we investigate theoretically the quantum uncertainty bounds for simultaneously detecting the linear and nonlinear phase shifts. Focusing our attentions only on the linear and the nonlinear Kerr phase shifts, we find the NOON states can not be used to measure the two phase parameters. Using the entangled coherent states, the estimation precision is limited by the $1/{N}^{1/2}$ ($1/{N}^{3/2}$) scaling for the linear (nonlinear) phase. To increase the precisions and beat the standard quantum limit, we show that the entangled Schr\"odinger-cat states can be used to reach the $1/N$ scaling for the linear phase and $1/{N}^{2}$ scaling for the nonlinear phase.

Physical Review A•Dec 29, 2014•24 citations

Optimal States and Almost Optimal Adaptive Measurements for Quantum Interferometry

Dominic William Berry, Howard M. Wiseman

We derive the optimal N-photon two-mode input state for obtaining an estimate straight phi of the phase difference between two arms of an interferometer. For an optimal measurement [B. C. Sanders and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2944 (1995)], it yields a variance (Deltastraight phi)(2) approximately pi(2)/N2, compared to O(N-1) or O(N-1/2) for states considered by previous authors. Such a measurement cannot be realized by counting photons in the interferometer outputs. However, we introduce an adaptive measurement scheme that can be thus realized, and show that it yields a variance in straight phi very close to that from an optimal measurement.

arXiv:quant-ph/0009117•Physical Review Letters•Dec 11, 2000•291 citations
Quantum information theory, applied to optical interferometry, yields a 1/n scaling of phase uncertainty Δφ independent of the applied phase shift φ, where n is the number of photons in the interferometer. This 1/n scaling is achieved provided that the output state is subjected to an optimal phase measurement. We establish this scaling law for both passive (linear) and active (nonlinear) interferometers and identify the coefficient of proportionality. Whereas a highly nonclassical state is required to achieve optimal scaling for passive interferometry, a classical input state yields a 1/n scaling of phase uncertainty for active interferometry.
Quantum information theory is applied to practical interferometer-based phase measurements to deduce the optimal phase measurement scheme with two optical modes. Optimal phase measurements, given ideal input states, reveal an asymptotic 1/n1/n1/n decrease in phase uncertainty $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\theta}$ for nnn the mean photon number of the input state. In contradistinction to previous schemes for realizing the number-phase uncertainty limit, the 1/n1/n1/n limit achieved here is independent of the interferometer phase shift; prior information about the expected phase shift is not necessary to attain this limit. These results apply more generally to su(2) and so(3) phase parameter estimation.
Summary form only given. Interferometry is the basis of many high-precision measurements. The ultimate limit to the precision is due to quantum effects. This limit is most easily explored for a Mach-Zehnder interferometer The outputs of this device can be measured to yield an estimate /spl phi/ of the phase difference /spl phi/ between the two arms of the interferometer. It is well known that this can achieve the standard quantum limit for phase variance when an N-photon number state enters one input port. Several authors have proposed ways of reducing the phase variance to the Heisenberg limit. In this paper we show that there is a physical measurement scheme using photodetectors and feedback that is almost as good as the optimal measurement. The fundamental idea is that, in addition to the unknown phase we wish to measure, /spl phi/, in one arm of the interferometer, we introduce a known phase shift, /spl Phi/, into the other arm of the interferometer. After each photodetection we adjust this introduced phase shift in order to minimize the expected uncertainty of our best phase estimate /spl phi/ after the next photodetection. This feedback process is uniquely defined using Bayesian statistics, and can be solved exactly for moderate photon numbers.
We address high-precision measurements by active and passive interferometric schemes based on Gaussian states and operations. In particular, we look for the best states to be injected into their ports according to the quantum Cramer–Rao bound, i.e., maximizing the quantum Fisher information over all the involved parameters, given a constraint on the overall mean number of photons entering into the interferometer. We found that for passive interferometers involving only beam splitters, the optimal input leading to Heisenberg scaling is a pair of identical squeezed-coherent states with at most one-third of the total energy employed in squeezing. For active interferometers involving optical amplifiers, input coherent signals are enough to achieve Heisenberg scaling, given an optimal value of the amplification gain. For passive schemes our results clarify the role of squeezing in improving both the reference phase and the signal phase of an interferometer.
The phase sensitivity of interferometers is limited by the so-called Heisenberg limit, which states that the optimum phase sensitivity is inversely proportional to the number of interfering particles NNN, a 1∕N1∕\sqrt{N}1∕N​ improvement over the standard quantum limit. We have used simulated annealing, a global optimization strategy, to systematically search for quantum interferometer input states that approach the Heisenberg-limited uncertainty in estimates of the interferometer phase shift. We compare the performance of these states to that of other nonclassical states already known to yield Heisenberg-limited uncertainty.
Quantum metrology allows the enhanced precision on estimating phase shifts in an optical interferometer to reach the $\ensuremath{\propto}1/N$ scaling of precision (NNN is the mean photon number of the light field). But when NNN is very large, the nonlinear optical effects may be nonnegligible. Here we investigate theoretically the quantum uncertainty bounds for simultaneously detecting the linear and nonlinear phase shifts. Focusing our attentions only on the linear and the nonlinear Kerr phase shifts, we find the NOON states can not be used to measure the two phase parameters. Using the entangled coherent states, the estimation precision is limited by the 1/N1/21/{N}^{1/2}1/N1/2 (1/N3/21/{N}^{3/2}1/N3/2) scaling for the linear (nonlinear) phase. To increase the precisions and beat the standard quantum limit, we show that the entangled Schr\"odinger-cat states can be used to reach the 1/N1/N1/N scaling for the linear phase and 1/N21/{N}^{2}1/N2 scaling for the nonlinear phase.
We derive the optimal N-photon two-mode input state for obtaining an estimate straight phi of the phase difference between two arms of an interferometer. For an optimal measurement [B. C. Sanders and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2944 (1995)], it yields a variance (Deltastraight phi)(2) approximately pi(2)/N2, compared to O(N-1) or O(N-1/2) for states considered by previous authors. Such a measurement cannot be realized by counting photons in the interferometer outputs. However, we introduce an adaptive measurement scheme that can be thus realized, and show that it yields a variance in straight phi very close to that from an optimal measurement.