Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

AIP conference proceedings

A new fundamental model of moving particle for reinterpreting Schrodinger equation

Muhamad Darwis Umar

Published Jan 1, 2012• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The study of Schrödinger equation based on a hypothesis that every particle must move randomly in a quantum-sized volume has been done. In addition to random motion, every particle can do relative motion through the movement of its quantum-sized volume. On the other way these motions can coincide. In this proposed model, the random motion is one kind of intrinsic properties of the particle. The every change of both speed of randomly intrinsic motion and or the velocity of translational motion of a quantum-sized volume will represent a transition between two states, and the change of speed of randomly intrinsic motion will generate diffusion process or Brownian motion perspectives. Diffusion process can take place in backward and forward processes and will represent a dissipative system. To derive Schrödinger equation from our hypothesis we use time operator introduced by Nelson. From a fundamental analysis, we find out that, naturally, we should view the means of Newton’s Law F⃗ = ma⃗ as no an external force, but it is just to describe both the presence of intrinsic random motion and the change of the particle energy.

DOI
10.1063/1.4730718

Related papers

Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Newtonian Mechanics

EDWARD B. NELSON

We examine the hypothesis that every particle of mass $m$ is subject to a Brownian motion with diffusion coefficient $\frac{\ensuremath{\hbar}}{2m}$ and no friction. The influence of an external field is expressed by means of Newton's law $\mathbf{F}=m\mathbf{a}$, as in the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck theory of macroscopic Brownian motion with friction. The hypothesis leads in a natural way to the Schr\"odinger equation, but the physical interpretation is entirely classical. Particles have continuous trajectories and the wave function is not a complete description of the state. Despite this opposition to quantum mechanics, an examination of the measurement process suggests that, within a limited framework, the two theories are equivalent.

Physical Review•Oct 28, 1966•1,717 citations

A New Stochastic Model of the Causal Interpretation of Quantum Theory on the Development of the Fundamental Concept of Mass

Muhamad Darwis Umar

In this paper we pose two fundamental ideas on the motion of an elementary particle supporting the internal "spin motion" or $\textit{Zitterbewegung}$ and a particle as concentrated energy. First, the particle moves randomly in a limited area (in a quantum sized-volume) like random vibrating system where the particle will diffuse in a quantum-sized volume when it absorbs or emits the quantized amount of energy. The quantum sized-volume can move too and plays role similar to the carrier amplitude, while the vibrational motion of the fundamental particle with frequency and amplitude represents a modulating signal. The current of diffusion process taking place in the quantum sized-volume will represent the emergence of a spin phenomenon shown by the existence of Clifford algebra. Second, the particle is pure energy concentrated on the surface of 3 dimensional sphere-form (2-manifold without boundary). Afterward we show that by defining the particle mass as an invariant quantity based on the two fundamental ideas, we can derive both the diffusion constant of the particle in the quantum sized-volume as $β= \hslash/2m$ and the Schrödinger equation. Furthermore, by posing that the vibrational motion of the particle limited on the quantum sized-volume plays fundamental role as time interval unit (proper time or particle clock), we show that the relativistic effects of the particle must represent atomic processes.

arXiv:1311.1836•Nov 6, 2013•0 citations

A new look at the derivation of the Schrödinger equation from Newtonian mechanics

L. Fritsche, M. Haugk

We present a modified version of Nelson's seminal paper on the derivation of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation which draws on the equation of motion of a particle that moves under the influence of a classical force field and additional stochastic forces. The emphasis of our elaboration is focused on the implication of allowing stochastic forces to occur, viz. that the energy E of the particle is no longer conserved on its trajectory in a conservative force field. We correlate this departure Δ E from its classical energy with the energy/time uncertainty relation where Δ t is the average time for Δ E to persist. The stability of atoms, the zero-point energy of oscillators, the tunneling effect and the diffraction at slits are shown to be directly connected with the occurrence of such energy fluctuations. We discuss and rederive Nelson's theory entirely from this point of view and generalize his approach to systems of N particles which interact via pair forces. Achieving reversibility in a description of particle motion that is akin to Brownian motion, represents a salient point of the derivation. We demonstrate that certain objections raised against Nelson's theory are without substance. We also try to put the particular worldview of this version of stochastic quantum mechanics into perspective with regard to the established Copenhagen interpretation.

Annalen der Physik•Jul 9, 2003•34 citations

A new look at the derivation of the Schrödinger equation from Newtonian mechanics

L. Fritsche, M. Haugk

Abstract We present a modified version of Nelson's seminal paper on the derivation of the time‐dependent Schrödinger equation which draws on the equation of motion of a particle that moves under the influence of a classical force field and additional stochastic forces. The emphasis of our elaboration is focused on the implication of allowing stochastic forces to occur, viz. that the energy E of the particle is no longer conserved on its trajectory in a conservative force field. We correlate this departure Δ E from its classical energy with the energy/time uncertainty relation where Δ t is the average time for Δ E to persist. The stability of atoms, the zero‐point energy of oscillators, the tunneling effect and the diffraction at slits are shown to be directly connected with the occurrence of such energy fluctuations. We discuss and rederive Nelson's theory entirely from this point of view and generalize his approach to systems of N particles which interact via pair forces. Achieving reversibility in a description of particle motion that is akin to Brownian motion, represents a salient point of the derivation. We demonstrate that certain objections raised against Nelson's theory are without substance. We also try to put the particular worldview of this version of stochastic quantum mechanics into perspective with regard to the established Copenhagen interpretation.

Annalen der Physik•Jul 7, 2003•9 citations

Quantum equations from Brownian motion

B. S. Rajput

The Schrödinger free particle equation in 1+1 dimension describes second-order effects in ensembles of lattice random walks, in addition to its role in quantum mechanics, and its solutions represent the continuous limit of a property of ensembles of Brownian particles. In the present paper, the classical Schrödinger and Dirac equations have been derived from the Brownian motions of a particle, and it has been shown that the classical Schrödinger equation can be transformed into the usual Schrödinger quantum equation on applying the Heisenberg uncertainty principle between position and momentum, while the Dirac quantum equation follows from its classical counterpart on applying the Heisenberg uncertainty principle between energy and time, without applying any analytical continuation.

Canadian Journal of Physics•Feb 1, 2011•1 citation

Schrödinger's Equation and Classical Brownian Motion

Garnet N. Ord

In the context of quantum mechanics, Schrödinger's equation has many possible interpretations, none of which appear to be entirely satisfactory. One reason for this is that there is no known microscopic model which yields both Schrödinger's equation and an accompanying ‘sensible’ interpretation. In contrast to this the diffusion equation is well known as a phenomenological equation obtainable from the microscopic model of Brownian motion. In this case the microscopic model provides an unambiguous interpretation of the partial differential equation. In this article we review work which shows that Schrödinger's equation by itself is also easily obtained from a lattice random walk version of the Brownian motion model. In this system, Schrödinger's equation arises by projection and the interpretation of wave functions is as direct and unambiguous as the interpretation of density in the diffusion case. However the direct interpretation is compatible with quantum mechanics only in a statistical sense in the context of ensembles of particles. This shows that measurement theory is the aspect of quantum theory which harbours the problems of interpretation, and we suggest the study of this and related systems to clearly illuminate the boundary between dynamics and measurement.

Fortschritte der Physik•Nov 1, 1998•5 citations
The study of Schrödinger equation based on a hypothesis that every particle must move randomly in a quantum-sized volume has been done. In addition to random motion, every particle can do relative motion through the movement of its quantum-sized volume. On the other way these motions can coincide. In this proposed model, the random motion is one kind of intrinsic properties of the particle. The every change of both speed of randomly intrinsic motion and or the velocity of translational motion of a quantum-sized volume will represent a transition between two states, and the change of speed of randomly intrinsic motion will generate diffusion process or Brownian motion perspectives. Diffusion process can take place in backward and forward processes and will represent a dissipative system. To derive Schrödinger equation from our hypothesis we use time operator introduced by Nelson. From a fundamental analysis, we find out that, naturally, we should view the means of Newton’s Law F⃗ = ma⃗ as no an external force, but it is just to describe both the presence of intrinsic random motion and the change of the particle energy.
We examine the hypothesis that every particle of mass mmm is subject to a Brownian motion with diffusion coefficient $\frac{\ensuremath{\hbar}}{2m}$ and no friction. The influence of an external field is expressed by means of Newton's law F=ma\mathbf{F}=m\mathbf{a}F=ma, as in the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck theory of macroscopic Brownian motion with friction. The hypothesis leads in a natural way to the Schr\"odinger equation, but the physical interpretation is entirely classical. Particles have continuous trajectories and the wave function is not a complete description of the state. Despite this opposition to quantum mechanics, an examination of the measurement process suggests that, within a limited framework, the two theories are equivalent.
In this paper we pose two fundamental ideas on the motion of an elementary particle supporting the internal "spin motion" or Zitterbewegung\textit{Zitterbewegung}Zitterbewegung and a particle as concentrated energy. First, the particle moves randomly in a limited area (in a quantum sized-volume) like random vibrating system where the particle will diffuse in a quantum-sized volume when it absorbs or emits the quantized amount of energy. The quantum sized-volume can move too and plays role similar to the carrier amplitude, while the vibrational motion of the fundamental particle with frequency and amplitude represents a modulating signal. The current of diffusion process taking place in the quantum sized-volume will represent the emergence of a spin phenomenon shown by the existence of Clifford algebra. Second, the particle is pure energy concentrated on the surface of 3 dimensional sphere-form (2-manifold without boundary). Afterward we show that by defining the particle mass as an invariant quantity based on the two fundamental ideas, we can derive both the diffusion constant of the particle in the quantum sized-volume as β=ℏ/2mβ= \hslash/2mβ=ℏ/2m and the Schrödinger equation. Furthermore, by posing that the vibrational motion of the particle limited on the quantum sized-volume plays fundamental role as time interval unit (proper time or particle clock), we show that the relativistic effects of the particle must represent atomic processes.
We present a modified version of Nelson's seminal paper on the derivation of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation which draws on the equation of motion of a particle that moves under the influence of a classical force field and additional stochastic forces. The emphasis of our elaboration is focused on the implication of allowing stochastic forces to occur, viz. that the energy E of the particle is no longer conserved on its trajectory in a conservative force field. We correlate this departure Δ E from its classical energy with the energy/time uncertainty relation where Δ t is the average time for Δ E to persist. The stability of atoms, the zero-point energy of oscillators, the tunneling effect and the diffraction at slits are shown to be directly connected with the occurrence of such energy fluctuations. We discuss and rederive Nelson's theory entirely from this point of view and generalize his approach to systems of N particles which interact via pair forces. Achieving reversibility in a description of particle motion that is akin to Brownian motion, represents a salient point of the derivation. We demonstrate that certain objections raised against Nelson's theory are without substance. We also try to put the particular worldview of this version of stochastic quantum mechanics into perspective with regard to the established Copenhagen interpretation.
Abstract We present a modified version of Nelson's seminal paper on the derivation of the time‐dependent Schrödinger equation which draws on the equation of motion of a particle that moves under the influence of a classical force field and additional stochastic forces. The emphasis of our elaboration is focused on the implication of allowing stochastic forces to occur, viz. that the energy E of the particle is no longer conserved on its trajectory in a conservative force field. We correlate this departure Δ E from its classical energy with the energy/time uncertainty relation where Δ t is the average time for Δ E to persist. The stability of atoms, the zero‐point energy of oscillators, the tunneling effect and the diffraction at slits are shown to be directly connected with the occurrence of such energy fluctuations. We discuss and rederive Nelson's theory entirely from this point of view and generalize his approach to systems of N particles which interact via pair forces. Achieving reversibility in a description of particle motion that is akin to Brownian motion, represents a salient point of the derivation. We demonstrate that certain objections raised against Nelson's theory are without substance. We also try to put the particular worldview of this version of stochastic quantum mechanics into perspective with regard to the established Copenhagen interpretation.
The Schrödinger free particle equation in 1+1 dimension describes second-order effects in ensembles of lattice random walks, in addition to its role in quantum mechanics, and its solutions represent the continuous limit of a property of ensembles of Brownian particles. In the present paper, the classical Schrödinger and Dirac equations have been derived from the Brownian motions of a particle, and it has been shown that the classical Schrödinger equation can be transformed into the usual Schrödinger quantum equation on applying the Heisenberg uncertainty principle between position and momentum, while the Dirac quantum equation follows from its classical counterpart on applying the Heisenberg uncertainty principle between energy and time, without applying any analytical continuation.
In the context of quantum mechanics, Schrödinger's equation has many possible interpretations, none of which appear to be entirely satisfactory. One reason for this is that there is no known microscopic model which yields both Schrödinger's equation and an accompanying ‘sensible’ interpretation. In contrast to this the diffusion equation is well known as a phenomenological equation obtainable from the microscopic model of Brownian motion. In this case the microscopic model provides an unambiguous interpretation of the partial differential equation. In this article we review work which shows that Schrödinger's equation by itself is also easily obtained from a lattice random walk version of the Brownian motion model. In this system, Schrödinger's equation arises by projection and the interpretation of wave functions is as direct and unambiguous as the interpretation of density in the diffusion case. However the direct interpretation is compatible with quantum mechanics only in a statistical sense in the context of ensembles of particles. This shows that measurement theory is the aspect of quantum theory which harbours the problems of interpretation, and we suggest the study of this and related systems to clearly illuminate the boundary between dynamics and measurement.