Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica B Condensed Matter

Flux phase states of the Hubbard model

Fedor Vasilievich Kusmartsev, MANFRED L. RISTIG

Published Feb 1, 1991• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0921-4526(91)90339-g

Related papers

Flux phases in the extended Hubbard model on the triangular lattice

Yuge Chen, Kun Jiang, Yi Zhang +1 more

Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy•Aug 1, 2024•4 citations

Ground States of the Hubbard Model

Assa Auerbach

Graduate texts in contemporary physics•Jan 1, 1994•0 citations

Generalized flux phases: Hubbard versust-Jmodel

Aniket Bhattacharya, C. S. Wang

Kinetic and magnetic energies are calculated for the two-dimensional Hubbard model using the variational Monte Carlo method and including a fictitious flux phase. In contrast to earlier results for the two-dimensional t-J model, we found all the flux phases studied lie higher in energy than the paramagnetic or the antiferromagnetic states. Near half-filling, the t-J model with no double occupancy on a lattice site is dominated by the magnetic energy, while the Hubbard model with partial double occupancy is dominated by the kinetic energy. When flux phases are introduced into the Hubbard model, the decrease in the magnetic energy is not nearly enough to offset the cost in kinetic energy.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•May 1, 1992•4 citations

On the Phase Diagram of the Hubbard Model

J. Monecke

physica status solidi (b)•Mar 1, 1976•7 citations

The flux phase problem on the ring

Fumihiko Nakano

We give a simple proof to derive the optimal flux which minimizes the ground state energy in one dimensional Hubbard model, provided the number of particles is even. KEY WORDS: Hubbard model, flux phase problem. 1

•Jan 1, 2000•7 citations

THE PHASE DIAGRAM OF THE HUBBARD MODEL

M W Long

Series on advances in statistical mechanics•Jul 1, 1991•0 citations
Kinetic and magnetic energies are calculated for the two-dimensional Hubbard model using the variational Monte Carlo method and including a fictitious flux phase. In contrast to earlier results for the two-dimensional t-J model, we found all the flux phases studied lie higher in energy than the paramagnetic or the antiferromagnetic states. Near half-filling, the t-J model with no double occupancy on a lattice site is dominated by the magnetic energy, while the Hubbard model with partial double occupancy is dominated by the kinetic energy. When flux phases are introduced into the Hubbard model, the decrease in the magnetic energy is not nearly enough to offset the cost in kinetic energy.