We establish a lower bound of Ω(n) on the bounded-error quantum query complexity of read-once Boolean functions. The result is proved via an inductive argument, together with an extension of a lower bound method of Ambainis. Ambainis’ method involves viewing a quantum computation as a mapping from inputs to quantum states (unit vectors in a complex inner-product space) which changes as the computation proceeds. Initially the mapping is constant (the state is independent of the input). If the computation evalutes the function f then at the end of the computation the two states associated with any f-distinguished pair of inputs (having different f values) are nearly orthogonal. Thus the inner product of their associated states must have changed from 1 to nearly 0. For any set of f-distinguished pairs of inputs, the sum of the inner products of the corresponding pairs of states must decrease significantly during the computation, By deriving an upper bound on the decrease in such a sum, during a single step, for a carefully selected set of input pairs, one can obtain a lower bound on the number of steps. We extend Ambainis’ bound by considering general weighted sums of f-distinguished pairs. We then prove our result for read-once functions by induction on the number of variables, where the induction step involves a careful choice of weights depending on f to optimize the lower bound attained.
We establish a lower bound of Ω(n) on the bounded-error quantum query complexity of read-once Boolean functions. The result is proved via an inductive argument, together with an extension of a lower bound method of Ambainis. Ambainis’ method involves viewing a quantum computation as a mapping from inputs to quantum states (unit vectors in a complex inner-product space) which changes as the computation proceeds. Initially the mapping is constant (the state is independent of the input). If the computation evalutes the function f then at the end of the computation the two states associated with any f-distinguished pair of inputs (having different f values) are nearly orthogonal. Thus the inner product of their associated states must have changed from 1 to nearly 0. For any set of f-distinguished pairs of inputs, the sum of the inner products of the corresponding pairs of states must decrease significantly during the computation, By deriving an upper bound on the decrease in such a sum, during a single step, for a carefully selected set of input pairs, one can obtain a lower bound on the number of steps. We extend Ambainis’ bound by considering general weighted sums of f-distinguished pairs. We then prove our result for read-once functions by induction on the number of variables, where the induction step involves a careful choice of weights depending on f to optimize the lower bound attained.
We reformulate quantum query complexity in terms of inequalities and equations for a set of positive semidefinite matrices. Using the new formulation we: 1) show that the workspace of a quantum computer can be limited to at most n+k qubits (where n and k are the number of input and output bits respectively) without reducing the computational power of the model; 2) give an algorithm that on input the truth table of a partial Boolean function and an integer t runs in time polynomial in the size of the truth table and estimates, to any desired accuracy, the minimum probability of error that can be attained by a quantum query algorithm attempts to evaluate f in t queries; 3) use semidefinite programming duality to formulate a dual SDP P/spl circ/(f, t, /spl epsi/) that is feasible if and only if f cannot be evaluated within error /spl epsi/ by a t-step quantum query algorithm. Using this SDP, we derive a general lower bound for quantum query complexity that encompasses a lower bound method of Ambainis and its generalizations; 4) give an interpretation of a generalized form of branching in quantum computation.
We prove a very general lower bound technique for quantum and randomized query complexity that is easy to prove as well as to apply. To achieve this, we introduce the use of Kolmogorov complexity to query complexity. Our technique generalizes the weighted and unweighted methods of Ambainis and the spectral method of Barnum, Saks, and Szegedy. As an immediate consequence of our main theorem, it can be shown that adversary methods can only prove lower bounds for Boolean functions f in O(min(nC0(f),nC1(f))), where C0,C1 is the certificate complexity and n is the size of the input.
We prove a very general lower bound technique for quantum and randomized query complexity, that is easy to prove as well as to apply. To achieve this, we introduce the use of Kolmogorov complexity to query complexity. Our technique generalizes the weighted, unweighted methods of Ambainis, and the spectral method of Barnum, Saks and Szegedy. As an immediate consequence of our main theorem, adversary methods can only prove lower bounds for boolean functions f in O(min(nC0(f),nC1(f))), where C0,C1 is the certificate complexity, and n is the size of the input. We also derive a general form of the ad hoc weighted method used by Hoyer, Neerbek and Shi to give a quantum lower bound on ordered search and sorting.
We prove a very general lower bound technique for quantum and randomized query complexity, that is easy to prove as well as to apply. To achieve this, we introduce the use of Kolmogorov complexity to query complexity. Our technique generalizes the weighted, unweighted methods of Ambainis, and the spectral method of Barnum, Saks and Szegedy. As an immediate consequence of our main theorem, it can be shown that adversary methods can only prove lower bounds for Boolean functions f in 0(min((/spl radic/nC/sup 0/(f)), (/spl radic/nC/sup 0/(f)))) where C/sup 0/, C/sup 1/ is the certificate complexity, and n is the size of the input. We also derive a general form of the ad hoc weighted method used by Hoyer, Neerbek and Shi to give a quantum lower bound on ordered search and sorting.
Quantum query complexity enjoys a variety of pleasing joint computation properties: for example, a composition theorem asserting Q(f∘g)=Θ(Q(f)Q(g)) for all Boolean functions f and g; a direct sum theorem asserting that computing k copies of a function (or search problem) costs Ω(k) times as much as the cost of computing one copy; and a direct product theorem asserting that for Boolean functions, even succeeding at the direct sum problem with exponentially small probability still requires Ω(k) times the cost of computing one copy to bounded error.
However, all of these results are strictly for worst-case quantum query complexity. For example, if we have a fixed distribution μ over inputs, the direct sum theorem says nothing about the quantum query complexity of computing k copies of f when the input comes from the product distribution μk instead of being worst-case. (Note that while a standard Yao-type minimax theorem guarantees a hard distribution for the direct sum problem, there's no guarantee that this hard distribution is a product distribution.) A similar problem occurs for the direct product theorem and the composition theorem: none of these results respect distributions.
In this work, we give distributional joint computation lower bounds for the composition, direct sum, and direct product problems. Along the way, we introduce some new tools for handling quantum query lower bounds, including (a) a new ``multiplicative'' variant of the γ2 norm (which we use in place of the multiplicative adversary method for proving the direct product theorem), and (b) a new ``Shaltiel-free'' measure of quantum query complexity, which we show characterizes the composition behavior of distributional quantum query complexity and satisfies pleasing properties.