Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Quantization of a general dynamical system

Shelomo Izhaq Ben-Abraham, A. Lonke

Published Dec 1, 1973• 12 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Invariance implies that the momentum operator should be represented by the covariant derivative. For a general dynamical system, both covariant canonical and path integral quantization yield in the Schrödinger equation a correction term proportional to the curvature. Earlier erroneous calculations are hereby corrected and reconciled.
DOI
10.1063/1.1666273

Related papers

Quantization of a General Dynamical System by Feynman's Path Integration Formulation

K. S. Cheng

The Schrödinger equation is obtained by Feynman's path integration method of quantization for a general dynamical system. The meaning of the results is discussed.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 1972•152 citations

A derivation of the principles of canonical quantization

Howard E. Covington

Schrodinger's equation for a single particle is proved from the assumption that dynamics can be formulated in a space whose curvature is the electromagnetic force.

•Dec 8, 2009•0 citations

Selecta from a Life-Long Obsession with Path Integrals

John R. Klauder, Christopher Casenas Bernido, M. Victoria Carpio-Bernido

The definition and interpretation of canonical, phase space path integrals has evolved over many years to achieve a form that now admits a correct and rigorous formulation, which is also covariant under canonical coordinate transformations. Such formulations involve coherent state representations, which, in their modern version, were originally introduced as an alternative tool to construct phase space path integrals. Moreover, coherent state representations lead to physical interpretations that are more natural than those afforded by more traditional representations. Suitable continuous time regularization procedures lead to a covariant phase space path integral formulation that greatly clarifies the vague phrase that canonical quantization requires Cartesian coordinates.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Comment on path integral derivation of Schrödinger equation in spaces with curvature and torsion

P Fiziev, H Kleinert

We present a derivation of the Schrödinger equation for a path integral of a point particle in a space with curvature and torsion which is considerably shorter and more elegant than that commonly found in the literature.

arXiv:hep-th/9604172•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Dec 7, 1996•4 citations

Canonical transformations in quantum mechanics: A canonically invariant path integral

Anwar Y. Shiekh

A particular form of the path integral is presented that allows the implementation of general canonical transformations in quantum mechanics, as well as a consistent quantization procedure.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Apr 1, 1988•8 citations

Path Integral Quantization and Riemannian-Symplectic Manifolds

Sergei V. Shabanov, John R. Klauder

We develop a mathematically well-defined path integral formalism for general symplectic manifolds. We argue that in order to make a path integral quantization covariant under general coordinate transformations on the phase space and involve a genuine functional measure that is both finite and countably additive, the phase space manifold should be equipped with a Riemannian structure (metric). A suitable method to calculate the metric is also proposed. 1. Most quantization formulations lead to correct results only when the system in question is expressed in one of a family of special (Cartesian) coordinate systems [1]. However, for Hamiltonian systems on a generic symplectic manifold, the canonical variables do not admit such special coordinates. Moreover classical Hamiltonian dynamics exhibits covariance under general coordinate transformations on the symplectic manifold, and, in this sense, is coordinate-free. This covariance is lost upon a formal phase-space path integral quantization. The reason is that the Hamiltonian action involves terms linear in the time derivatives and, therefore, its exponential (even in Euclidean time) does not induce a

•Jan 1, 1998•6 citations
The definition and interpretation of canonical, phase space path integrals has evolved over many years to achieve a form that now admits a correct and rigorous formulation, which is also covariant under canonical coordinate transformations. Such formulations involve coherent state representations, which, in their modern version, were originally introduced as an alternative tool to construct phase space path integrals. Moreover, coherent state representations lead to physical interpretations that are more natural than those afforded by more traditional representations. Suitable continuous time regularization procedures lead to a covariant phase space path integral formulation that greatly clarifies the vague phrase that canonical quantization requires Cartesian coordinates.
We develop a mathematically well-defined path integral formalism for general symplectic manifolds. We argue that in order to make a path integral quantization covariant under general coordinate transformations on the phase space and involve a genuine functional measure that is both finite and countably additive, the phase space manifold should be equipped with a Riemannian structure (metric). A suitable method to calculate the metric is also proposed. 1. Most quantization formulations lead to correct results only when the system in question is expressed in one of a family of special (Cartesian) coordinate systems [1]. However, for Hamiltonian systems on a generic symplectic manifold, the canonical variables do not admit such special coordinates. Moreover classical Hamiltonian dynamics exhibits covariance under general coordinate transformations on the symplectic manifold, and, in this sense, is coordinate-free. This covariance is lost upon a formal phase-space path integral quantization. The reason is that the Hamiltonian action involves terms linear in the time derivatives and, therefore, its exponential (even in Euclidean time) does not induce a