Summary form only given. In a magneto-optical trap (MOT) two main mechanisms contribute to the total trap loss rate. Radiative escape (RE), where the spontaneous emission within the collision duration transforms internal energy into kinetic motion. Fine-structure changing collision (FSC) is an exoergic process where a pair of excited ground state atoms undergoes a change to the lower state of the fine-structure doublet, followed by a release of /spl Delta/E/sub FSC//2 in kinetic energy normally enough to eject the atoms from the trap. In earlier experiments only the total trap loss rate, which is the sum of contributions from RE and FSC, was determined. Distinguishing between these two mechanisms is important because it allows a more precise comparison with the theory, leading to a better understanding of exoergic cold collisions. In this experiment the FSC contribution to the total loss in /sup 85/Rb is measured by direct photoionization of the P/sub 1/2/ fragments.
Accurate measurements are presented of the rate of trap-loss-producing collisions between ultracold magneto-optically trapped
7Li atoms for a range of trap laser intensities and frequencies. Intensities from near the atomic saturation intensity to well above it are investigated. At low intensities, fine-structure-changing collisions cause trap loss with a rate constant of \ensuremath{\sim}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}10}$
cm3/s. At sufficiently high intensity, the trap can be deep enough to effectively freeze out the dominant fine-structure-changing collisions as a loss mechanism, enabling an accurate comparison of the radiative escape loss rate with theory. At the lowest intensities of this radiative escape regime, the measured loss rates compare favorably with those calculated using an optical Bloch equation theory and a three-dimensional model of trap depth. However, the intensity dependence of the measured rates does not show the saturation predicted by the optical Bloch equation theory. It is shown that reliable knowledge of trap depth is necessary to accurately compare experiment with theory.