A time for a quantum particle to traverse a barrier is obtained for stationary states by setting the local value of a ``time'' operator equal to a constant. This time operator, called the tempus operator because it is distinct from the time of evolution, is defined as the operator canonically conjugate to the energy operator. The local value of the tempus operator gives a complex time for a particle to traverse a barrier. The method is applied to a particle with a semiclassical wave function, which gives, in the classical limit, the correct classical traversal time. It is also applied to a quantum particle tunneling through a rectangular barrier. The resulting complex tunneling time is compared with complex tunneling times from other methods.
The precise definition and physical interpretation of a tunneling time is a fundamental problem in quantum mechanics. The lack of a well-defined time operator in quantum theory precludes the calculation of time in terms of an expectation value. Consequently, model calculations and simulation studies have been proposed and used to determine the time for a particle to traverse a quantum-mechanical barrier. The results offer both qualitatively and quantitatively, disparate predictions. One of the more commonly used approaches is the phase method, which we have applied to several one-dimensional model potentials to show that the tunneling time is characterized by the ratio of the typical decay length in the barrier to the incident velocity, τ∼(1/κ)/v0. We also show that the phase and the spin precession methods are equivalent when the magnetic field is applied throughout the space containing the particle wave function and the tunneling barrier. In principle, the spin precession method can be regarded as an operational definition of the tunneling time. It also has been shown that a tunneling time can be defined operationally for a time-dependent barrier, for which the model calculations predict a tunneling time given by the mean barrier width divided by the magnitude of the imaginary velocity of the particle in the barrier, τ∼d/‖v‖. This pseudokinematic result has been inferred by magnetic field dependent tunneling through heterostructures and computer simulation of wave packet tunneling through one-dimensional square barriers. Other tunneling time theories predict one or the other of the above mentioned characteristic times; several theories predict both. We interpret these different results for τ to mean that a tunneling time is not uniquely defined as a function of particle energy and the barrier shape unless the process in which the tunneling is involved is also specified. That is, the tunneling time is a meaningful and unique concept only for particular tunneling processes or definite operational procedures.
Time continues to be an intriguing physical property in the modern era. On the one hand, we have the classical and relativistic notion of time, where space and time have the same hierarchy, essential in describing events in spacetime. On the other hand, in quantum mechanics, time appears as a classical parameter, meaning that it does not have an uncertain relation with its canonical conjugate. In this work we use a recent spacetime-symmetric proposal [Phys. Rev. A 95, 032133 (2017)] that tries to solve the unbalance in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics by extending the usual Hilbert space: the time parameter
t and the position operator $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{X}$ in one subspace, and the position parameter
x and time operator
T in the other subspace. Time as an operator is better suited for describing tunneling processes. We then solve the
1/2-fractional integrodifferential equation for a particle subjected to strong and weak potential limits and obtain an analytical expression for the tunneling time through a rectangular barrier. Using a Gaussian energy distribution, we demonstrate that for wave packets well resolved in time, the expectation value of the operator
T is the energy average of the classical time ${T}_{\text{class}}=\ensuremath{\partial}S/\ensuremath{\partial}E$, where
S is the classical action, which can be real or imaginary. The imaginary classical time does not contribute to the traveling time. Furthermore, we apply our results to a Gaussian energy distribution and compare them to previous works. This work is a correction of a previous paper [Phys. Rev. A 107, 052220 (2023)].
A variety of different theoretical procedures have been used to determine tunneling times. These include (1) phase time; (2) the Stevens procedure; (3) Larmor times; (4) a complex “time”; (5) dwell time; (6) the Büttikker-Landauer time; (7) Feynman path-integrals; (8) scattering theory; (9) a stochastic formulation; (10) oscillatory perturbation of the barrier; (11) kinetic time; and (12) the semiclassical solution. Interest in tunneling times is not purely pedagogical, since correction for changes in image potential during transit is required in determining the conductance of several new high-speed semiconductor devices. A new procedure to evaluate transit time is presented, which assumes that energy fluctuations keep a tunneling particle above the barrier while transiting the classically forbidden region. For large rectangular barriers, the most probable fluctuations minimize the product of their magnitude and the transit time. This results in the semiclassical solution. For the case of very small barriers, there is a separate solution in which the transit time is indeterminate but bounded. The new solution is compared with 12 different results by others. Numerical values, limiting forms, and interpretations are presented for these various tunneling times. Difficulties in using time domain numerical solutions to determine the transit time for a wave packet will also be described. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
We demonstrate that the time operator that measures the time of arrival of a quantum particle into a chosen state can be defined as a self-adjoint quantum-mechanical operator using periodic boundary conditions and applied to wave functions in energy representation. The time becomes quantized into discrete eigenvalues; and the eigenstates of the time operator, i.e., the stroboscopic wave packets introduced recently [Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 046402 (2008)], form an orthogonal system of states. The formalism provides simple physical interpretation of the time-measurement process and direct construction of normalized, positive definite probability distribution for the quantized values of the arrival time. The average value of the time is equal to the phase time but in general depends on the choice of zero time eigenstate, whereas the uncertainty of the average is related to the traversal time and is independent of this choice. The general formalism is applied to a particle tunneling through a resonant tunneling barrier in one dimension.
Tunneling problems are characterized by different quantum time scales of motion. In this paper, we identify a tunneling time scale, which is based on a simple variational principle. The method utilizes the stationary eigenfunctions for a given one-dimensional potential structure, and it provides a truly local definition of the tunneling time, independent of the asymptotic shape of the potential. We express the minimum tunneling time in terms of the more common time scales obtained from the Larmor clock setup. Asymptotic formulas for both the extreme quantum and the semiclassical limit are presented. As an experimental verification of the variational approach we demonstrate that the minimum tunneling time governs the time a particle requires to traverse the barrier in a symmetric double-well structure.