Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Integrability and nonintegrability of quantum systems. II. Dynamics in quantum phase space

Wei-Min Zhang, D.H. Feng, Jian-Min Yuan

Published Dec 1, 1990• 31 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Based on the concepts of integrability and nonintegrability of a quantum system presented in a previous paper [Zhang, Feng, Yuan, and Wang, Phys. Rev. A 40, 438 (1989)], a realization of the dynamics in the quantum phase space is now presented. For a quantum system with dynamical group scrG and in one of its unitary irreducible-representation carrier spaces ${\mathit{gerh}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}$, the quantum phase space is a 2${\mathit{M}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}$-dimensional topological space, where ${\mathit{M}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}$ is the quantum-dynamical degrees of freedom. This quantum phase space is isomorphic to a coset space scrG/scrH via the unitary exponential mapping of the elementary excitation operator subspace of scrg (algebra of scrG), where scrH (\ensuremath{\subset}scrG) is the maximal stability subgroup of a fixed state in ${\mathit{gerh}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}$. The phase-space representation of the system is realized on scrG/scrH, and its classical analogy can be obtained naturally. It is also shown that there is consistency between quantum and classical integrability. Finally, a general algorithm for seeking the manifestation of ``quantum chaos'' via the classical analogy is provided. Illustrations of this formulation in several important quantum systems are presented.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.42.7125

Related papers

Classical and Quantum Integrability: A Formulation That Admits Quantum Chaos

Paul Bracken

The concept of integrability of a quantum system is developed and studied. By formulating the concepts of quantum degree of freedom and quantum phase space, a realization of the dynamics is achieved. For a quantum system with a dynamical group G in one of its unitary irreducible representative carrier spaces, the quantum phase space is a finite topological space. It is isomorphic to a coset space G/R by means of the unitary exponential mapping, where R is the maximal stability subgroup of a fixed state in the carrier space. This approach has the distinct advantage of exhibiting consistency between classical and quantum integrability. The formalism will be illustrated by studying several quantum systems in detail after this development.

IntechOpen eBooks•Nov 25, 2020•1 citation

Dynamical Symmetry Breaking and Quantum Nonintegrability

Wei-Min Zhang, Craig C. Martens, D.H. Feng +1 more

In this Letter, we describe the connection between the classical concepts of nonintegrability and chaos and the quantum concept of dynamical symmetry breaking. The existence of unbroken dynamical symmetry implies integrability of the mean-field motion in a quantum phase space, defined as a symplectic coherent-state parametrization of the coset space of the overall dynamical group. Broken dynamical symmetry leads to nonintegrability, and thus chaotic solutions to Hamilton's equations in the quantum phase space. We illustrate the general ideas with results obtained for a model of two coupled spins.

Physical Review Letters•Nov 7, 1988•41 citations

Hamiltonian Chaos III

Niraj Srivastava, Charles Kaufman, Gerhard H. Muller

Does quantum chaos exist?If it exists, what is it?If it does not, what was it supposed to have been?Why should we associate chaos with a "third revolution in physics" if it fails to be expressible in terms of quantum mechanics, our most fundamental theory of physical reality?Is there something wrong with quantum mechanics?Or is chaos merely a mathematical construct relevant only for models in classical mechanics?Is the human mind doomed to interpret and understand quantum mechanics in classical terms?The list of unanswered questions in quantum chaos research itself shows symptoms of the phenomenon it attempts to grasp. 1 How do we recognize classical Hamiltonian chaos?We have dealt with this question in our two previous columns.2,3 In Part I we discussed the implications of integrability and non-integrability for the phase-space trajectories of classical Hamiltonian systems with two degrees of freedom.We described the method of Poincaré surfaces of section as a convenient and striking discriminant between the two possibilities.In Part II we searched for an alternate mode of representation for classical Hamiltonian systems, a mode that is an equally powerful indicator of chaos, but one that can be more directly translated into quantum mechanics than the Poincaré map.We proposed a representation based on the construction of classical invariants via time averages of dynamical variables, a representation that can be employed under very general circumstances including integrable and nonintegrable models.In this column we shall construct quantum invariants, demonstrate the impact of non-integrability on these quantities, and discuss their properties in relation to their classical counterparts.In a future column we intend to introduce quantum Poincaré surfaces of section for stationary states and bring full circle our survey of quantum and classical Hamiltonian chaos.Consider a quantized integrable model.Its eigenstates are labeled by quantum numbers.There are as many quantum numbers as there are degrees of freedom.Each quantum number represents a quantized action.In the still evolving language of quantum chaos, quantum numbers are said to have been "lost" in the transition from a quantum system whose classical counterpart is integrable to one whose counterpart is chaotic.The broken, or lost, tori of classical chaos become lost quantum numbers of quantum chaos.As we shall see, the loss of quantum numbers is vividly mirrored in the behavior of the quantum invariants.We begin by describing the construction of the quantum invariants for a

Computers in Physics•Jan 1, 1992•3 citations

Integrability and nonintegrability of quantum systems: Quantum integrability and dynamical symmetry

Wei-Min Zhang, D.H. Feng, Jian‐Min Yuan +1 more

In this paper we discuss the concepts of quantum integrability and nonintegrability. Based on the concept of a complete set of commuting observables and the Hilbert-space structure of a quantum system, the definitions are given for the quantum-dynamical degrees of freedom and quantum phase space from which the quantum integrability is defined. A criterion for quantum integrability then emerges; the system is integrable if it possesses dynamical symmetry. Breaking of dynamical symmetry is connected with the nonintegrability of systems and thus is the inherent mechanism of chaotic motion. A number of examples are discussed.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1989•61 citations

Integrability and non-integrability in quantum mechanics

Marek Kuś

The concepts of integrability, non-integrability and chaos in quantum mechanics are examined, and it is indicated that they all are sensibly definable only in connection with the corresponding properties of their classical analogues. The concrete examples concern the quantum and classical properties of dynamic systems on SU3 algebra and classically integrable but quantum nonintegrable system with two degrees of freedom.

Journal of Modern Optics•Oct 1, 2002•0 citations

Phase-space representation of quantum mechanics and its relation to phase-space path integrals

Kazuo Takatsuka

A detailed framework for a new formalism of phase-space path integral is presented, the outline of the theory of which has been reported elsewhere [K. Takatsuka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 503 (1988)]. This path integral is described in terms of a phase-space distribution function, which was proposed earlier by the present author under the name of the dynamical characteristic function (DCF). The DCF is characterized by two independent wave functions and with two phase spaces. In the present paper, we extend the DCF by utilizing the Feynman kernel in place of the two independent wave functions. This is called the identity DCF. The dynamics of the DCF for general wave packets is reduced to that of the identity DCF. Some characteristics of the identity DCF are presented. For example, the quantum-mechanical time-evolution operator is represented in terms of the identity DCF and of a complete set of quantum q (coordinate) and p (momentum) operators. A semiclassical theory for the identity DCF is also developed, its primary aim being the study of heavy-particle dynamics such as molecular collisions.It is shown that the propagation of the identity DCF is represented by classical trajectories, each of which is associated with an amplitude factor and with the action integral as the quantum phase factor. This amplitude factor is free from singularity, unlike the primitive semiclassical expression of the Feynman kernel, which is well known to diverge at caustics. The physical significance of the identity DCF is analyzed in the context of chaotic dynamics. In particular, it is shown that its amplitude factor is an explicit function of the eigenvalues of a Jacobian matrix [\ensuremath{\partial}(${\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{f}}$,${\mathit{p}}_{\mathit{f}}$)/\ensuremath{\partial}(${\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{i}}$,${\mathit{p}}_{\mathit{i}}$)], where (${\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{i}}$,${\mathit{p}}_{)}$ and (${q}_{f}$,${p}_{f}$) are the initial and final points, respectively, of a classical trajectory. These eigenvalues are well known in the study of the classical chaos of Hamilton systems and have been used to construct a measure of the linear (and local) stability of an orbit, the Liapounov characteristic exponents, and so on. Further, if the identity DCF is applied to a periodic orbit, the amplitude factor becomes equivalent to the square root of the determinant of a matrix, which is the so-called monodromy matrix minus the unit matrix. This matrix is one of the standard quantities used in bifurcation theory to investigate the stability of fixed points. In fact, the amplitude factor is closely related to the so-called residue, which was proposed by Greene [J. Math. Phys. 20, 1183 (1979)] in order to predict the occurrence of global chaos in classical systems. It is emphasized that all these classical quantities arise naturally in our representation of quantum mechanics.

Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1989•15 citations
Based on the concepts of integrability and nonintegrability of a quantum system presented in a previous paper [Zhang, Feng, Yuan, and Wang, Phys. Rev. A 40, 438 (1989)], a realization of the dynamics in the quantum phase space is now presented. For a quantum system with dynamical group scrG and in one of its unitary irreducible-representation carrier spaces gerh\ensuremathΛ{\mathit{gerh}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}gerh\ensuremathΛ​, the quantum phase space is a 2M\ensuremathΛ{\mathit{M}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}M\ensuremathΛ​-dimensional topological space, where M\ensuremathΛ{\mathit{M}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}M\ensuremathΛ​ is the quantum-dynamical degrees of freedom. This quantum phase space is isomorphic to a coset space scrG/scrH via the unitary exponential mapping of the elementary excitation operator subspace of scrg (algebra of scrG), where scrH (\ensuremath{\subset}scrG) is the maximal stability subgroup of a fixed state in gerh\ensuremathΛ{\mathit{gerh}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}gerh\ensuremathΛ​. The phase-space representation of the system is realized on scrG/scrH, and its classical analogy can be obtained naturally. It is also shown that there is consistency between quantum and classical integrability. Finally, a general algorithm for seeking the manifestation of ``quantum chaos'' via the classical analogy is provided. Illustrations of this formulation in several important quantum systems are presented.
The concept of integrability of a quantum system is developed and studied. By formulating the concepts of quantum degree of freedom and quantum phase space, a realization of the dynamics is achieved. For a quantum system with a dynamical group G in one of its unitary irreducible representative carrier spaces, the quantum phase space is a finite topological space. It is isomorphic to a coset space G/R by means of the unitary exponential mapping, where R is the maximal stability subgroup of a fixed state in the carrier space. This approach has the distinct advantage of exhibiting consistency between classical and quantum integrability. The formalism will be illustrated by studying several quantum systems in detail after this development.
In this Letter, we describe the connection between the classical concepts of nonintegrability and chaos and the quantum concept of dynamical symmetry breaking. The existence of unbroken dynamical symmetry implies integrability of the mean-field motion in a quantum phase space, defined as a symplectic coherent-state parametrization of the coset space of the overall dynamical group. Broken dynamical symmetry leads to nonintegrability, and thus chaotic solutions to Hamilton's equations in the quantum phase space. We illustrate the general ideas with results obtained for a model of two coupled spins.
Does quantum chaos exist?If it exists, what is it?If it does not, what was it supposed to have been?Why should we associate chaos with a "third revolution in physics" if it fails to be expressible in terms of quantum mechanics, our most fundamental theory of physical reality?Is there something wrong with quantum mechanics?Or is chaos merely a mathematical construct relevant only for models in classical mechanics?Is the human mind doomed to interpret and understand quantum mechanics in classical terms?The list of unanswered questions in quantum chaos research itself shows symptoms of the phenomenon it attempts to grasp. 1 How do we recognize classical Hamiltonian chaos?We have dealt with this question in our two previous columns.2,3 In Part I we discussed the implications of integrability and non-integrability for the phase-space trajectories of classical Hamiltonian systems with two degrees of freedom.We described the method of Poincaré surfaces of section as a convenient and striking discriminant between the two possibilities.In Part II we searched for an alternate mode of representation for classical Hamiltonian systems, a mode that is an equally powerful indicator of chaos, but one that can be more directly translated into quantum mechanics than the Poincaré map.We proposed a representation based on the construction of classical invariants via time averages of dynamical variables, a representation that can be employed under very general circumstances including integrable and nonintegrable models.In this column we shall construct quantum invariants, demonstrate the impact of non-integrability on these quantities, and discuss their properties in relation to their classical counterparts.In a future column we intend to introduce quantum Poincaré surfaces of section for stationary states and bring full circle our survey of quantum and classical Hamiltonian chaos.Consider a quantized integrable model.Its eigenstates are labeled by quantum numbers.There are as many quantum numbers as there are degrees of freedom.Each quantum number represents a quantized action.In the still evolving language of quantum chaos, quantum numbers are said to have been "lost" in the transition from a quantum system whose classical counterpart is integrable to one whose counterpart is chaotic.The broken, or lost, tori of classical chaos become lost quantum numbers of quantum chaos.As we shall see, the loss of quantum numbers is vividly mirrored in the behavior of the quantum invariants.We begin by describing the construction of the quantum invariants for a
In this paper we discuss the concepts of quantum integrability and nonintegrability. Based on the concept of a complete set of commuting observables and the Hilbert-space structure of a quantum system, the definitions are given for the quantum-dynamical degrees of freedom and quantum phase space from which the quantum integrability is defined. A criterion for quantum integrability then emerges; the system is integrable if it possesses dynamical symmetry. Breaking of dynamical symmetry is connected with the nonintegrability of systems and thus is the inherent mechanism of chaotic motion. A number of examples are discussed.
A detailed framework for a new formalism of phase-space path integral is presented, the outline of the theory of which has been reported elsewhere [K. Takatsuka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 503 (1988)]. This path integral is described in terms of a phase-space distribution function, which was proposed earlier by the present author under the name of the dynamical characteristic function (DCF). The DCF is characterized by two independent wave functions and with two phase spaces. In the present paper, we extend the DCF by utilizing the Feynman kernel in place of the two independent wave functions. This is called the identity DCF. The dynamics of the DCF for general wave packets is reduced to that of the identity DCF. Some characteristics of the identity DCF are presented. For example, the quantum-mechanical time-evolution operator is represented in terms of the identity DCF and of a complete set of quantum q (coordinate) and p (momentum) operators. A semiclassical theory for the identity DCF is also developed, its primary aim being the study of heavy-particle dynamics such as molecular collisions.It is shown that the propagation of the identity DCF is represented by classical trajectories, each of which is associated with an amplitude factor and with the action integral as the quantum phase factor. This amplitude factor is free from singularity, unlike the primitive semiclassical expression of the Feynman kernel, which is well known to diverge at caustics. The physical significance of the identity DCF is analyzed in the context of chaotic dynamics. In particular, it is shown that its amplitude factor is an explicit function of the eigenvalues of a Jacobian matrix [\ensuremath{\partial}(qf{\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{f}}qf​,pf{\mathit{p}}_{\mathit{f}}pf​)/\ensuremath{\partial}(qi{\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{i}}qi​,pi{\mathit{p}}_{\mathit{i}}pi​)], where (qi{\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{i}}qi​,p){\mathit{p}}_{)}p)​ and (qf{q}_{f}qf​,pf{p}_{f}pf​) are the initial and final points, respectively, of a classical trajectory. These eigenvalues are well known in the study of the classical chaos of Hamilton systems and have been used to construct a measure of the linear (and local) stability of an orbit, the Liapounov characteristic exponents, and so on. Further, if the identity DCF is applied to a periodic orbit, the amplitude factor becomes equivalent to the square root of the determinant of a matrix, which is the so-called monodromy matrix minus the unit matrix. This matrix is one of the standard quantities used in bifurcation theory to investigate the stability of fixed points. In fact, the amplitude factor is closely related to the so-called residue, which was proposed by Greene [J. Math. Phys. 20, 1183 (1979)] in order to predict the occurrence of global chaos in classical systems. It is emphasized that all these classical quantities arise naturally in our representation of quantum mechanics.