Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Comment on “Magnetized Pair Bose Gas: Relativistic Superconductor”

Per Elmfors, Per Liljenberg, David Persson, Bo-Sture Skagerstam

Published Sep 4, 1995• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A Comment on the Letter by J. Daicic, N. E. Frankel, and V. Kowalenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1779 (1993). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 31 March 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2067©1995 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.75.2067

Related papers

Comment on “Electronic Model for Superconductivity”

Antimo Angelucci, Sandro Sorella

A Comment on the Letter by Fabian H. L. Essler, Vladimir E. Korepin, and Kareljan Schoutens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 73 (1993). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 27 July 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4289©1996 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 27, 1996•2 citations

Comment on “Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling of a Bose-Einstein Condensate with Attractive Interaction”

Xiaobing Wang, Lee Chang, Bing‐Lin Gu

A Comment on the Letter by Masahito Ueda and Anthony J. Leggett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1576 (1998). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 23 March 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1342©1998 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Aug 10, 1998•4 citations

Comment on “Nature of Quantum Localization in Atomic Momentum Transfer Experiments”

S. Meneghini, P. J. Bardroff, E. Mayr +1 more

A Comment on the Letter by Miroslaw Latka and Bruce J. West. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4202 (1995). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 20 December 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1195©1997 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 10, 1997•7 citations

Comment on “Nature of Quantum Localization in Atomic Momentum Transfer Experiments”

Mark G. Raizen, Bala Sundaram, Qian Niu

A Comment on the Letter by Miroslaw Latka and Bruce J. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4202 (1995). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 18 December 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1194©1997 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 10, 1997•5 citations

Comment on “Quantum Backreaction on `Classical' Variables”

K. R. W. Jones

A Comment on the Letter by Arlen Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 621 (1995). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 27 February 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4087©1996 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 20, 1996•19 citations

Can Classical and Quantum Variables have a Consistent Mutual Interaction?

I. R. Senitzky

A Comment on the Letter by Arlen Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 621 (1995). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 13 March 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4089©1996 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 20, 1996•15 citations
A Comment on the Letter by J. Daicic, N. E. Frankel, and V. Kowalenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1779 (1993). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 31 March 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2067©1995 American Physical Society