Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Is quantum mechanics crazy?

Daniel T. Gillespie

Published Dec 1, 1989• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1119/1.15790

Related papers

Is quantum mechanics crazy?

Elden C. Whipple

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1990•1 citation

Is Quantum Reduction the Ultimate Outcome of Decoherence ?

Roland L. Omnes

This model was crazy (or not crazy enough for this topic) and it would lead to a reduction time much longer than the age of the universe.

arXiv:quant-ph/0603092•Mar 10, 2006•1 citation

Can We Ever Hope to Understand Quantum Mechanics?

Selçuk Ş. Bayın

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Crazy and Interesting: Exploring Parallel Universes and Alternative Realities

Melek Sert

Crazy and Interesting: Exploring Parallel Universes and Alternative Realities — an article published in Journal of Unique and Crazy Ideas.

•May 28, 2023•0 citations

Is Quantum Mechanics Pointless

Frank Arntzeniusy

•Jan 1, 2004•5 citations

Six Impossible Things: The Mystery of the Quantum World

John R. Gribbin

A concise and engaging investigation of six interpretations of quantum physics.Rules of the quantum world seem to say that a cat can be both alive and dead at the same time and a particle can be in two places at once. And that particle is also a wave; everything in the quantum world can described in terms of waves?or entirely in terms of particles. These interpretations were all established by the end of the 1920s, by Erwin Schrodinger, Werner Heisenberg, Paul Dirac, and others. But no one has yet come up with a common sense explanation of what is going on. In this concise and engaging book, astrophysicist John Gribbin offers an overview of six of the leading interpretations of quantum mechanics. Gribbin calls his account ?agnostic,? explaining that none of these interpretations is any better?or any worse?than any of the others. Gribbin presents the Copenhagen Interpretation, promoted by Niels Bohr and named by Heisenberg; the Pilot-Wave Interpretation, developed by Louis de Broglie; the Many Worlds Interpretation (termed ?excess baggage? by Gribbin); the Decoherence Interpretation (?incoherent?); the Ensemble ?Non-Interpretation?; and the Timeless Transactional Interpretation (which theorized waves going both forward and backward in time). All of these interpretations are crazy, Gribbin warns, and some are more crazy than others?but in the quantum world, being more crazy does not necessarily mean more wrong.

•Oct 8, 2019•4 citations
A concise and engaging investigation of six interpretations of quantum physics.Rules of the quantum world seem to say that a cat can be both alive and dead at the same time and a particle can be in two places at once. And that particle is also a wave; everything in the quantum world can described in terms of waves?or entirely in terms of particles. These interpretations were all established by the end of the 1920s, by Erwin Schrodinger, Werner Heisenberg, Paul Dirac, and others. But no one has yet come up with a common sense explanation of what is going on. In this concise and engaging book, astrophysicist John Gribbin offers an overview of six of the leading interpretations of quantum mechanics. Gribbin calls his account ?agnostic,? explaining that none of these interpretations is any better?or any worse?than any of the others. Gribbin presents the Copenhagen Interpretation, promoted by Niels Bohr and named by Heisenberg; the Pilot-Wave Interpretation, developed by Louis de Broglie; the Many Worlds Interpretation (termed ?excess baggage? by Gribbin); the Decoherence Interpretation (?incoherent?); the Ensemble ?Non-Interpretation?; and the Timeless Transactional Interpretation (which theorized waves going both forward and backward in time). All of these interpretations are crazy, Gribbin warns, and some are more crazy than others?but in the quantum world, being more crazy does not necessarily mean more wrong.