Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Chemical Education

Response to Incorrect Mathematical Operators in a Two-Dimensional Quantum Problem

Mark D. Ellison

Published Dec 1, 2009• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

The author offers corrections to several equations found in his earlier article.
DOI
10.1021/ed086p1371

Related papers

Reply to Comment on ‘Computations in quantum mechanics made easy’

H. J. Korsch, Kevin Rapedius

European Journal of Physics•Oct 14, 2020•0 citations

Incorrect Mathematical Operators in a Two-Dimensional Quantum Problem

Ranjan Das

Comment in which the author agrees with the difficulties in the teaching–learning process of quantum mechanics and discusses some basic problems in the quantum mechanical treatment as presented in an earlier article.

Journal of Chemical Education•Dec 1, 2009•1 citation

Comment on ‘‘Quantum mysteries revisited,’’ by N. David Mermin [Am. J. Phys. 5 8, 731–734 (1990)]

Achin Sen

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1991•9 citations

Comment on “Spontaneous collapse: A solution to the measurement problem and a source of the decay in mesonic systems”

Antoine Tilloy

In a recent article [Phys. Rev. A 94, 052128 (2016)], the authors compute the predictions of two collapse models on the transition probabilities of neutral mesons. Notably, they claim to find an influence on the decay rates and attempt to prove that a new parameter $\ensuremath{\theta}(0)$ is required to fully characterize the noise of standard collapse models. These two claims are incorrect and motivated by flawed computations. This Comment derives the correct transition probabilities exactly from the master equation, explains how they could be computed perturbatively in a safe way, and finally shows where the main mistake of the authors of the original article was made.

arXiv:1711.02928•Physical Review A•Nov 7, 2017•1 citation

Pauli graphs when the Hilbert space dimension contains a square: Why the Dedekind psi function?

Michel R. P. Planat

The Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical publishing team would like to apologise to the author of the above paper. Due to an oversight, the article was published with an incorrect publication date. The correct date is: 20 December 2010.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Mar 24, 2011•9 citations

Comment on: “Critical assessment of the Schrödinger picture of quantum mechanics”

Hrvoje Nikolić

arXiv:quant-ph/0309136•Physics Letters A•Apr 24, 2004•1 citation
In a recent article [Phys. Rev. A 94, 052128 (2016)], the authors compute the predictions of two collapse models on the transition probabilities of neutral mesons. Notably, they claim to find an influence on the decay rates and attempt to prove that a new parameter $\ensuremath{\theta}(0)$ is required to fully characterize the noise of standard collapse models. These two claims are incorrect and motivated by flawed computations. This Comment derives the correct transition probabilities exactly from the master equation, explains how they could be computed perturbatively in a safe way, and finally shows where the main mistake of the authors of the original article was made.