Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Philosophical Logic

The foundations of probability and quantum mechanics

Peter Milne

Published Apr 1, 1993• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf01049259

Related papers

Quantum Probability Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Jürg Martin Fröhlich, Baptiste Schubnel

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2015•36 citations

Groups and probabilities at the foundations of quantum mechanics

Ya.A. Smorodinskii, A. L. Shelepin, Leonid A. Shelepin

Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk•Dec 1, 1992•7 citations

Foundations of probability and physics--5 : Växjö, Sweden, 24-27 August 2008

Luigi Accardi

This conference was devoted to fundamental questions raised by quantum mechanics, especially in quantum information theory. As has become customary in our series of conference in Vaxjo, we were glad to welcome a fruitful assembly of theoretical physicists, experimentalists, mathematicians and even philosophers interested in the foundations of probability and physics. This conference belongs to the series of Vaxjo conferences in foundations of quantum mechanics (especially probabilistic foundations) combined of two subseries, Foundations of Probability and Physics: 2000, 02, 04, 06, 08, and Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations: 2001, 03, 05, 07. We also mention the first Vaxjo conference: Bohmian mechanics 2000. This is definitely the longest series of conferences on foundations in the history of quantum mechanics.

AIP eBooks•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Foundations of quantum probability

Stanley Gudder

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Oct 1, 1993•5 citations

Objective and Subjective Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics

Leslie Ballentine, Guillaume Adenier, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov +3 more

The concept of probability was prominent in the original foundations of quantum mechanics and continues to be so today. Indeed, the controversies regarding objective and subjective interpretations of probability have again become active. I argue that, although both objective and subjective probabilities have domains of relevance in QM, their roles are quite distinct. Even where both are legitimate, the objective and subjective probabilities differ, both conceptually and numerically. There are quantum probabilities that have no useful subjective interpretations, and there are subjective probabilities that cannot be realized as quantum probabilities.

arXiv:0710.5945•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2007•1 citation

Probability and quantum mechanics

Diederik Aerts

•Jan 1, 1984•0 citations
This conference was devoted to fundamental questions raised by quantum mechanics, especially in quantum information theory. As has become customary in our series of conference in Vaxjo, we were glad to welcome a fruitful assembly of theoretical physicists, experimentalists, mathematicians and even philosophers interested in the foundations of probability and physics. This conference belongs to the series of Vaxjo conferences in foundations of quantum mechanics (especially probabilistic foundations) combined of two subseries, Foundations of Probability and Physics: 2000, 02, 04, 06, 08, and Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations: 2001, 03, 05, 07. We also mention the first Vaxjo conference: Bohmian mechanics 2000. This is definitely the longest series of conferences on foundations in the history of quantum mechanics.
The concept of probability was prominent in the original foundations of quantum mechanics and continues to be so today. Indeed, the controversies regarding objective and subjective interpretations of probability have again become active. I argue that, although both objective and subjective probabilities have domains of relevance in QM, their roles are quite distinct. Even where both are legitimate, the objective and subjective probabilities differ, both conceptually and numerically. There are quantum probabilities that have no useful subjective interpretations, and there are subjective probabilities that cannot be realized as quantum probabilities.