Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Il Nuovo Cimento

A causal interpretation of the pauli equation (B)

David Böhm, Ralph Schiller

Published Jan 1, 1955• 72 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02743529

Related papers

A causal interpretation of the pauli equation (A)

David Böhm, Ralph Schiller, J. Tiomno

Il Nuovo Cimento•Jan 1, 1955•113 citations

PROBLEMS POSED BY THE CAUSAL INTERPRETATION OF THE HYDRODYNAMIC PAULI EQUATION

Pïerre Hillion

Compt. rend.•Nov 13, 1957•0 citations

Model of the Causal Interpretation of Quantum Theory in Terms of a Fluid with Irregular Fluctuations

David Böhm, Jean Pierre Vigier

In this paper, we propose a physical model leading to the causal interpretation of the quantum theory. In this model, a set of fields which are equivalent in many ways to a conserved fluid, with density ${|\ensuremath{\psi}|}^{2}$, and local stream velocity, $\frac{d\ensuremath{\xi}}{\mathrm{dt}}=\frac{\ensuremath{\nabla}S}{m}$, act on a particle-like inhomogeneity which moves with the local stream velocity of the equivalent fluid. By introducing the hypothesis of a very irregular and effectively random fluctuation in the motions of the fluid, we are able to prove that an arbitrary probability density ultimately decays into ${|\ensuremath{\psi}|}^{2}$. Thus, we answer an important objection to the causal interpretation, made by Pauli and others. This result is extended to the Dirac equation and to the many-particle problem.

Physical Review•Oct 1, 1954•608 citations

Experimental test of a possible violation of the Pauli principle

Valery Novikov, A.A. Pomanskii

•Jan 1, 1989•4 citations

Comments on an Article of Takabayasi conserning the Formulation of Quantum Mechanics with Classical Pictures

David Böhm

Certain of Takabayasi's criticism of a causal re-interpretation of the quantum theory are answered in detail. It is indecated how this interpretation can be extended to the Dirac equation, and the problem of the identity of equivalent particles is discussed, for the case of particles that satisfy the Pauli principle. Possible extensions of theory are indicated. Finally, criticisms at the philosophical level are discussed, especially the question of what it means to call a theory "metaphysical" and the reasons why the concept of causality is indispensable in scientific theories.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Mar 1, 1953•74 citations

The Explanation of the Pauli Exclusion Principle

V. P. Vasiliev, Russell Moon

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Nov 20, 2006•0 citations
In this paper, we propose a physical model leading to the causal interpretation of the quantum theory. In this model, a set of fields which are equivalent in many ways to a conserved fluid, with density ${|\ensuremath{\psi}|}^{2}$, and local stream velocity, $\frac{d\ensuremath{\xi}}{\mathrm{dt}}=\frac{\ensuremath{\nabla}S}{m}$, act on a particle-like inhomogeneity which moves with the local stream velocity of the equivalent fluid. By introducing the hypothesis of a very irregular and effectively random fluctuation in the motions of the fluid, we are able to prove that an arbitrary probability density ultimately decays into ${|\ensuremath{\psi}|}^{2}$. Thus, we answer an important objection to the causal interpretation, made by Pauli and others. This result is extended to the Dirac equation and to the many-particle problem.
Certain of Takabayasi's criticism of a causal re-interpretation of the quantum theory are answered in detail. It is indecated how this interpretation can be extended to the Dirac equation, and the problem of the identity of equivalent particles is discussed, for the case of particles that satisfy the Pauli principle. Possible extensions of theory are indicated. Finally, criticisms at the philosophical level are discussed, especially the question of what it means to call a theory "metaphysical" and the reasons why the concept of causality is indispensable in scientific theories.