Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Synthese

Structural Realism and the Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory

Tian Yu Cao

Published Jul 1, 2003• 68 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1023/a:1024139713910

Related papers

Ontic structural realism and quantum field theory: Are there intrinsic properties at the most fundamental level of reality?

Philipp Berghofer

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Sep 14, 2017•17 citations

Ontic structural realism and the interpretation of quantum mechanics

Michaël Esfeld

European Journal for Philosophy of Science•May 8, 2012•49 citations

LRT Constraints on QFT: Deriving Fock Structure and Interpreting Renormalization from Logical Foundations

James (JD) Longmire

Logic Realism Theory (LRT) derives non-relativistic quantum mechanics from the claim that the Three Fundamental Laws of Logic are ontological constraints constitutive of physical distinguishability. This paper extends LRT to quantum field theory through a tiered derivation structure with explicit physical inputs at each level. We establish three principal results: (1) Fock space structure is derived from LRT axioms plus Lorentz invariance and locality; (2) the spin-statistics connection follows from Lorentz invariance and microcausality via the standard Pauli argument; (3) the uniqueness of complex QFT is established. The paper distinguishes derivations from interpretations. Cluster decomposition, vacuum uniqueness, and the spectral gap are physical inputs (Tier 4), not consequences of logical constraints. Renormalization is interpreted as 3FLL-restoration at UV scales, but this does not derive renormalization group equations. Four predictions and six strong falsifiers are identified.

•Dec 1, 2025•0 citations

A New Perspective on the Philosophical Implications of Quantum Field Theory

Damiano Anselmi

Synthese•Jun 1, 2003•3 citations

Effective Ontic Structural Realism

James Ladyman, Lorenzo Lorenzetti

Three accounts of effective realism (ER) have been advanced to solve three problems for scientific realism: Fraser and Vickers (forthcoming) develop a version of ER about non-relativistic quantum mechanics that they argue is compatible with all the main realist versions (‘interpretations’) of quantum mechanics avoiding the problem of underdetermination among them; Williams (2019) and Fraser (2020b) propose ER about quantum field theory as a response to the problems facing realist interpretations; Robertson and Wilson (forthcoming) propose ER to deal with the dubious ontological status of the entities belonging to superseded theories. This paper argues for the unification of these proposals based on realism about modal structure and the idea of scale relativity of ontology developed by ontic structural realists. This solves problems some or all the accounts of ER face, especially that of making explicit in what way they are realist. Furthermore, we respond to a recent critique that has been raised against the ontic structural realist account of quantum mechanics that we employ.

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Dec 13, 2023•14 citations

On Various Realisms in Quantum Theory

Michael Stöltzner

The Western Ontario series in philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1999•4 citations
Logic Realism Theory (LRT) derives non-relativistic quantum mechanics from the claim that the Three Fundamental Laws of Logic are ontological constraints constitutive of physical distinguishability. This paper extends LRT to quantum field theory through a tiered derivation structure with explicit physical inputs at each level. We establish three principal results: (1) Fock space structure is derived from LRT axioms plus Lorentz invariance and locality; (2) the spin-statistics connection follows from Lorentz invariance and microcausality via the standard Pauli argument; (3) the uniqueness of complex QFT is established. The paper distinguishes derivations from interpretations. Cluster decomposition, vacuum uniqueness, and the spectral gap are physical inputs (Tier 4), not consequences of logical constraints. Renormalization is interpreted as 3FLL-restoration at UV scales, but this does not derive renormalization group equations. Four predictions and six strong falsifiers are identified.
Three accounts of effective realism (ER) have been advanced to solve three problems for scientific realism: Fraser and Vickers (forthcoming) develop a version of ER about non-relativistic quantum mechanics that they argue is compatible with all the main realist versions (‘interpretations’) of quantum mechanics avoiding the problem of underdetermination among them; Williams (2019) and Fraser (2020b) propose ER about quantum field theory as a response to the problems facing realist interpretations; Robertson and Wilson (forthcoming) propose ER to deal with the dubious ontological status of the entities belonging to superseded theories. This paper argues for the unification of these proposals based on realism about modal structure and the idea of scale relativity of ontology developed by ontic structural realists. This solves problems some or all the accounts of ER face, especially that of making explicit in what way they are realist. Furthermore, we respond to a recent critique that has been raised against the ontic structural realist account of quantum mechanics that we employ.