Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica Scripta

The Bell inequality and correlation of spin projection functions

V. A. Andreev

Published Jul 1, 2009• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Bell inequality two-particle spin states are considered. It is shown that violation of this inequality at experimental verifications is connected with the fact that it is proved for some arbitrary random variables, but in experimental verification random variables of special type are used. A new inequality is constructed. It contains a correlation coefficient of random variables, measured at the experiment, and does not have to be violated at experimental verification. For factorizable and separable states it coincides with the usual Bell inequality.

DOI
10.1088/0031-8949/2009/t135/014001

Related papers

Single-particle Bell-type Inequality

Afshin Shafiee, Mehdi Golshani

It is generally believed that Bell's inequality holds for the case of entangled states, including two correlated particles or special states of a single particle. Here, we derive a single-particle Bell's inequality for two correlated spin states at two successive times, appealing to the statistical independence condition in an ideal experiment, for a locally causal hidden variables theory. We show that regardless of the locality assumption, the inequality can be violated by some quantum predictions.

arXiv:quant-ph/9907017•Annales de la fondation Louis de Broglie/Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie•Jul 6, 1999•5 citations

The Bell Inequalities: Identifying What Is Testable and What Is Not

Louis Sica

The Bell theorem and inequality were derived as consequences of seemingly reasonable physical and statistical hypotheses. Bell’s assumptions were used to deduce cross-correlations of three spin measurements on two entangled particles neglecting non-commutation. The assumed correlation functions, later confirmed for certain quantum measurements, violate the Bell inequality. The present paper reviews a more general derivation of the Bell inequality showing that it is identically satisfied by finite data sets whether deterministic or random, after assuming merely that they exist. It is thereafter concerned with the consequences of this result for interpretations of the inequality that result in its violation. A primary finding is that correlation functions have differing forms due to quantum commutation, non-commutation, and conditions of measurement, and result in satisfaction of the Bell inequality used consistently with its derivation. A stochastic process having the same correlation function for all variable pairs is shown to be inconsistent with experimentally reported data. The logic of the three and four variable inequalities is shown to be similar. Finally the inequalities in probabilities are shown to follow from those in correlations with quantum mechanical results satisfying either when properly implemented.

arXiv:1903.02116•Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2020•9 citations

Correlation functions, Bell's inequalities and the fundamental conservation laws

C. S. Unnikrishnan

I derive the correlation function for a general theory of two-valued spin variables that satisfy the fundamental conservation law of angular momentum. The unique theory-independent correlation function is identical to the quantum mechanical correlation function. I prove that any theory of correlations of such discrete variables satisfying the fundamental conservation law of angular momentum violates the Bell’s inequalities. Taken together with the Bell’s theorem, this result has far reaching implications. No theory satisfying Einstein locality, reality in the EPR-Bell sense, and the validity of the conservation law can be constructed. Therefore, all local hidden variable theories are incompatible with fundamental symmetries and conservation laws. Bell’s inequalities can be obeyed only by violating a conservation law. The implications for experiments on Bell’s inequalities are obvious. The result provides new insight regarding entanglement, and its measures. PACS Numbers: 03.65.Ta, 03.65.Ud The main result of this paper is the proof that a general physical theory of correlations of two-valued spin projections violate the Bell’s inequalities if the theory satisfies the conservation law for angular momentum on the average. The proof is applicable to local hidden variable theories, as well as

•Jan 1, 2004•12 citations

The Bell inequality, inviolable by data used consistently with its derivation, leads to quantum correlations that satisfy it, and probabilities that satisfy the Wigner inequality

Louis Sica

It is not generally known, that the inequality that Bell derived using three random variables must be identically satisfied by any three corresponding data sets of plus and minus 1s that are writable on paper.This surprising fact is not immediately obvious from Bell's inequality derivation based on causal random variables, but follows immediately if the same mathematical operations are applied to finite data sets.For laboratory data, the inequality is identically satisfied as a fact of pure algebra, and its satisfaction is independent of whether the processes generating the data are local, nonlocal, deterministic, random, or nonsensical.It follows that if predicted correlations violate the inequality, they represent no three cross correlated data sets that experimentally exist or can be generated from valid probability models. Reported data that violate the inequality consist of probabilistically independent data pairs and are thus inconsistent with inequality derivation.In the case of random variables as Bell assumed, the correlations in the inequality may be expressed in terms of the probabilities that give rise to them.A new inequality results, the Wigner inequality that must be satisfied by quantum mechanical probabilities in the case of Bell experiments.If that were not the case, predicted quantum probabilities and correlations would be inconsistent with basic algebra.

arXiv:2102.13227•Feb 25, 2021•0 citations

Quantum Tomography and Verification of Generalized Bell-CHSH Inequalities

V. A. Andreev

It is shown that verification procedure of Bell inequalities consists of three parts. The first stage of verification procedure is consist of measurements of a set of spin correlations. Using them one can reconstruct a density matrix of two‐particle state. It can be done with the help of quantum tomography technique. At the second stage one must construct a generalized Bell inequality corresponding to this state. This inequality must be constructed in two forms: within the framework of the traditional formulation of quantum mechanics and in the frames of a local hidden variables theory. Only after that the results of experimental measurements can be compared with theoretical predictions. It is a third stage of verification.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2005•1 citation

Bell’s-inequality experiments using independent-particle sources

Bernard Yurke, David Stoler

In the usual Bell's-inequality experiments two particles carrying spin or polarization are prepared in an entangled state generated from the decay of an unstable quantum-mechanical system. These particles are then delivered to spin or polarization analyzers. The statistics of the measurements reported by the analyzers are incompatible with our notions of local realism. Here we show that Bell's-inequality violations occur even when the initial state is a direct product state. In fact, the two particles can come from two independent widely separated sources.

Physical Review A•Sep 1, 1992•174 citations
The Bell inequality two-particle spin states are considered. It is shown that violation of this inequality at experimental verifications is connected with the fact that it is proved for some arbitrary random variables, but in experimental verification random variables of special type are used. A new inequality is constructed. It contains a correlation coefficient of random variables, measured at the experiment, and does not have to be violated at experimental verification. For factorizable and separable states it coincides with the usual Bell inequality.
It is generally believed that Bell's inequality holds for the case of entangled states, including two correlated particles or special states of a single particle. Here, we derive a single-particle Bell's inequality for two correlated spin states at two successive times, appealing to the statistical independence condition in an ideal experiment, for a locally causal hidden variables theory. We show that regardless of the locality assumption, the inequality can be violated by some quantum predictions.
The Bell theorem and inequality were derived as consequences of seemingly reasonable physical and statistical hypotheses. Bell’s assumptions were used to deduce cross-correlations of three spin measurements on two entangled particles neglecting non-commutation. The assumed correlation functions, later confirmed for certain quantum measurements, violate the Bell inequality. The present paper reviews a more general derivation of the Bell inequality showing that it is identically satisfied by finite data sets whether deterministic or random, after assuming merely that they exist. It is thereafter concerned with the consequences of this result for interpretations of the inequality that result in its violation. A primary finding is that correlation functions have differing forms due to quantum commutation, non-commutation, and conditions of measurement, and result in satisfaction of the Bell inequality used consistently with its derivation. A stochastic process having the same correlation function for all variable pairs is shown to be inconsistent with experimentally reported data. The logic of the three and four variable inequalities is shown to be similar. Finally the inequalities in probabilities are shown to follow from those in correlations with quantum mechanical results satisfying either when properly implemented.
I derive the correlation function for a general theory of two-valued spin variables that satisfy the fundamental conservation law of angular momentum. The unique theory-independent correlation function is identical to the quantum mechanical correlation function. I prove that any theory of correlations of such discrete variables satisfying the fundamental conservation law of angular momentum violates the Bell’s inequalities. Taken together with the Bell’s theorem, this result has far reaching implications. No theory satisfying Einstein locality, reality in the EPR-Bell sense, and the validity of the conservation law can be constructed. Therefore, all local hidden variable theories are incompatible with fundamental symmetries and conservation laws. Bell’s inequalities can be obeyed only by violating a conservation law. The implications for experiments on Bell’s inequalities are obvious. The result provides new insight regarding entanglement, and its measures. PACS Numbers: 03.65.Ta, 03.65.Ud The main result of this paper is the proof that a general physical theory of correlations of two-valued spin projections violate the Bell’s inequalities if the theory satisfies the conservation law for angular momentum on the average. The proof is applicable to local hidden variable theories, as well as
It is not generally known, that the inequality that Bell derived using three random variables must be identically satisfied by any three corresponding data sets of plus and minus 1s that are writable on paper.This surprising fact is not immediately obvious from Bell's inequality derivation based on causal random variables, but follows immediately if the same mathematical operations are applied to finite data sets.For laboratory data, the inequality is identically satisfied as a fact of pure algebra, and its satisfaction is independent of whether the processes generating the data are local, nonlocal, deterministic, random, or nonsensical.It follows that if predicted correlations violate the inequality, they represent no three cross correlated data sets that experimentally exist or can be generated from valid probability models. Reported data that violate the inequality consist of probabilistically independent data pairs and are thus inconsistent with inequality derivation.In the case of random variables as Bell assumed, the correlations in the inequality may be expressed in terms of the probabilities that give rise to them.A new inequality results, the Wigner inequality that must be satisfied by quantum mechanical probabilities in the case of Bell experiments.If that were not the case, predicted quantum probabilities and correlations would be inconsistent with basic algebra.
It is shown that verification procedure of Bell inequalities consists of three parts. The first stage of verification procedure is consist of measurements of a set of spin correlations. Using them one can reconstruct a density matrix of two‐particle state. It can be done with the help of quantum tomography technique. At the second stage one must construct a generalized Bell inequality corresponding to this state. This inequality must be constructed in two forms: within the framework of the traditional formulation of quantum mechanics and in the frames of a local hidden variables theory. Only after that the results of experimental measurements can be compared with theoretical predictions. It is a third stage of verification.
In the usual Bell's-inequality experiments two particles carrying spin or polarization are prepared in an entangled state generated from the decay of an unstable quantum-mechanical system. These particles are then delivered to spin or polarization analyzers. The statistics of the measurements reported by the analyzers are incompatible with our notions of local realism. Here we show that Bell's-inequality violations occur even when the initial state is a direct product state. In fact, the two particles can come from two independent widely separated sources.