Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

From a ’’laboratory’’ Galilei−Hilbert bundle to an algebra of observables

Maria Cristina Abbati, Renzo Cirelli, Franco Gallone

Published Apr 1, 1975• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

After a schematic examination of the ’’physical’’ representations of the Galilei group, a quantum mechanical description is drawn from a ’’laboratory’’ one in the case of a free elementary system with spin, assuming that the kinematical group is the Galilei group. In fact, the ’’laboratory states’’ of the system naturally fit in a Galilei−Hilbert bundle. Then, according to the general theory of the unitary representations of groups in the framework of Hilbert bundles which is outlined in this paper, a unitary representation of the Galilei group is constructed which is shown to contain all the physical Galilei representations. The quantum mechanical description which has been obtained in this way gives rise to an algebra of observables by means of a general procedure which connects a unitary representation of a Lie group with a Hilbert representation of the corresponding Lie algebra. The inner energy is shown to be a superobservable for the system under consideration. Moreover, the kinematical properties of such a system are independent of the values of the inner energy.

DOI
10.1063/1.522599

Related papers

Galilean quantum kinematics

Jorge Krause

The Galilean symmetry of a free particle in one-dimensional space is examined under the scope of non-Abelian quantum kinematics. Within the Hilbert space that carries the regular ray representation of the Galilei group the Schrödinger operator appears as one of the three fundamental invariants of the extended kinematic algebra. By means of a superselection rule the physical Hilbert subspaces of the system are identified, in which a complementary ray representation of the Galilean transformation produces the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, and the Feynman space-time propagator. The quantization approach used in this paper is purely group theoretic and relativistic.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Feb 1, 1988•12 citations

Galilei Group and Nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics

Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond

This paper is devoted to the study of the Galilei group and its representations. The Galilei group presents a certain number of essential differences with respect to the Poincaré group. As Bargmann showed, its physical representations, here explicitly constructed, are not true representations but only up-to-a-factor ones. Consequently, in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, the mass has a very special role, and in fact, gives rise to a superselection rule which prevents the existence of unstable particles. The internal energy of a nonrelativistic system is known to be an arbitrary parameter; this is shown to come also from Galilean invariance, because of a nontrivial concept of equivalence between physical representations. On the contrary, the behavior of an elementary system with respect to rotations, is very similar to the relativistic case. We show here, in particular, how the number of polarization states reduces to two for the zero-mass case (though in fact there are no physical zero-mass systems in nonrelativistic mechanics). Finally, we study the two-particle system, where the orbital angular momenta quite naturally introduce themselves through the decomposition of the tensor product of two physical representations.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1963•241 citations

Group-theoretical foundations of classical and quantum mechanics. II. Elementary systems

Luis Martı́nez Alonso

Classical and quantum elementary systems are investigated from the point of view of invariance under a connected Lie group. The classification and characterization of elementary systems are considered in a unified way. The representation theory of symmetric and enveloping algebras is used as a tool in order to characterize the observables physically and also to analyze the analogies between classical and quantum mechanics. The results obtained are applied to the Galilei, Poincaré, and Weyl Lie groups.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Feb 1, 1979•10 citations

Projective representation of the Galilei group for classical and quantum–classical systems*

A D Bermúdez Manjarres

Abstract A physically relevant unitary irreducible non-projective representation of the Galilei group is possible in the Koopman–von Neumann formulation of classical mechanics. This classical representation is characterized by the vanishing of the central charge of the Galilei algebra. This is in contrast to the quantum case where the mass plays the role of the central charge. Here we show, by direct construction, that classical mechanics also allows for a projective representation of the Galilei group where the mass is the central charge of the algebra. We extend the result to certain kind of quantum–classical hybrid systems.

arXiv:2107.03623•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Sep 21, 2021•9 citations

Quantum mechanics without quantization: Representing a universal kinematical group

Gerald A. Goldin

A certain infinite-dimensional Lie group, obtained originally by regularizing and then exponentiating a singular local current algebra constructed from canonical fields, has been shown over several decades to describe a wide variety of quantum systems, via its continuous unitary representations. The group is a semidirect product of Schwartz space functions under pointwise addition with a diffeomorphism group under composition. Previously unsuspected possibilities were predicted this way, including anyons and nonabelian anyons in two-dimensional space. Last year David Sharp and I offered a much simpler, direct construction. We proposed fundamental reasons why this group serves as a universal kinematical group for quantum systems with mass in an arbitrary physical space. This paper beyond summarizing that construction, discusses more extensively what it means to obtain quantum mechanics without actually quantizing classical observables in phase space, and answers some fundamental questions. Directions are suggested for obtaining still greater generality of kinematical and dynamical possibilities by modifying the initial assumptions.

International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics•Mar 27, 2025•0 citations

EXTENDED QUANTUM MECHANICS

B Pavel

The work can be considered as an essay on mathematical and conceptual structure of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics (QM) which is related here to some other (more general, but also to more special and “approximative”) theories. QM is here primarily reformulated in an equivalent form of a Poisson system on the phase space consisting of density matrices, where the “observables”, as well as “symmetry generators” are represented by a specific type of real valued (densely defined) functions, namely the usual quantum expectations of corresponding selfadjoint operators. It is shown in this paper that inclusion of additional (“nonlinear”) symmetry generators (i.e. “Hamiltonians”) into this reformulation of (linear) QM leads to a considerable extension of the theory: two kinds of quantum “mixed states” should be distinguished, and operator ‐ valued functions of density matrices should be used in the r ˆ ole of “nonlinear observables”. A general framework for physical theories is obtained in this way: By different choices of the sets of “nonlinear observables” we obtain, as special cases, e.g. classical mechanics on homogeneous spaces of kinematical symmetry groups, standard (linear) QM, or nonlinear extensions of QM; also various “quasiclassical approximations” to QM are all subtheories of the presented extension of QM - a version of the extended quantum mechanics (EQM). A general interpretation scheme of EQM extending the usual statistical interpretation of QM is also proposed. Eventually, EQM is shown to be (included into) a C -algebraic (hence linear) quantum theory. Mathematical formulation of these theories is presented. The presentation includes an analysis of problems connected with differentiation on infinite ‐ dimensional manifolds, as well as a solution of some problems connected with the work with only densely defined unbounded real‐valued functions on the (infinite dimensional) “phase space” which correspond to unbounded operators (generators) and to their nonlinear generalizations. Also “nonlinear deformations” of unitary representations of kinematical symmetry Lie groups are introduced. Possible applications are briefly discussed, and some specific examples are presented. The text contains also brief reviews of Hamiltonian classical mechanics, as well as of QM. Mathematical appendices make the paper nearly selfcontained.

•Jan 1, 2000•18 citations
After a schematic examination of the ’’physical’’ representations of the Galilei group, a quantum mechanical description is drawn from a ’’laboratory’’ one in the case of a free elementary system with spin, assuming that the kinematical group is the Galilei group. In fact, the ’’laboratory states’’ of the system naturally fit in a Galilei−Hilbert bundle. Then, according to the general theory of the unitary representations of groups in the framework of Hilbert bundles which is outlined in this paper, a unitary representation of the Galilei group is constructed which is shown to contain all the physical Galilei representations. The quantum mechanical description which has been obtained in this way gives rise to an algebra of observables by means of a general procedure which connects a unitary representation of a Lie group with a Hilbert representation of the corresponding Lie algebra. The inner energy is shown to be a superobservable for the system under consideration. Moreover, the kinematical properties of such a system are independent of the values of the inner energy.
The Galilean symmetry of a free particle in one-dimensional space is examined under the scope of non-Abelian quantum kinematics. Within the Hilbert space that carries the regular ray representation of the Galilei group the Schrödinger operator appears as one of the three fundamental invariants of the extended kinematic algebra. By means of a superselection rule the physical Hilbert subspaces of the system are identified, in which a complementary ray representation of the Galilean transformation produces the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, and the Feynman space-time propagator. The quantization approach used in this paper is purely group theoretic and relativistic.
This paper is devoted to the study of the Galilei group and its representations. The Galilei group presents a certain number of essential differences with respect to the Poincaré group. As Bargmann showed, its physical representations, here explicitly constructed, are not true representations but only up-to-a-factor ones. Consequently, in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, the mass has a very special role, and in fact, gives rise to a superselection rule which prevents the existence of unstable particles. The internal energy of a nonrelativistic system is known to be an arbitrary parameter; this is shown to come also from Galilean invariance, because of a nontrivial concept of equivalence between physical representations. On the contrary, the behavior of an elementary system with respect to rotations, is very similar to the relativistic case. We show here, in particular, how the number of polarization states reduces to two for the zero-mass case (though in fact there are no physical zero-mass systems in nonrelativistic mechanics). Finally, we study the two-particle system, where the orbital angular momenta quite naturally introduce themselves through the decomposition of the tensor product of two physical representations.
Classical and quantum elementary systems are investigated from the point of view of invariance under a connected Lie group. The classification and characterization of elementary systems are considered in a unified way. The representation theory of symmetric and enveloping algebras is used as a tool in order to characterize the observables physically and also to analyze the analogies between classical and quantum mechanics. The results obtained are applied to the Galilei, Poincaré, and Weyl Lie groups.
Abstract A physically relevant unitary irreducible non-projective representation of the Galilei group is possible in the Koopman–von Neumann formulation of classical mechanics. This classical representation is characterized by the vanishing of the central charge of the Galilei algebra. This is in contrast to the quantum case where the mass plays the role of the central charge. Here we show, by direct construction, that classical mechanics also allows for a projective representation of the Galilei group where the mass is the central charge of the algebra. We extend the result to certain kind of quantum–classical hybrid systems.
A certain infinite-dimensional Lie group, obtained originally by regularizing and then exponentiating a singular local current algebra constructed from canonical fields, has been shown over several decades to describe a wide variety of quantum systems, via its continuous unitary representations. The group is a semidirect product of Schwartz space functions under pointwise addition with a diffeomorphism group under composition. Previously unsuspected possibilities were predicted this way, including anyons and nonabelian anyons in two-dimensional space. Last year David Sharp and I offered a much simpler, direct construction. We proposed fundamental reasons why this group serves as a universal kinematical group for quantum systems with mass in an arbitrary physical space. This paper beyond summarizing that construction, discusses more extensively what it means to obtain quantum mechanics without actually quantizing classical observables in phase space, and answers some fundamental questions. Directions are suggested for obtaining still greater generality of kinematical and dynamical possibilities by modifying the initial assumptions.
The work can be considered as an essay on mathematical and conceptual structure of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics (QM) which is related here to some other (more general, but also to more special and “approximative”) theories. QM is here primarily reformulated in an equivalent form of a Poisson system on the phase space consisting of density matrices, where the “observables”, as well as “symmetry generators” are represented by a specific type of real valued (densely defined) functions, namely the usual quantum expectations of corresponding selfadjoint operators. It is shown in this paper that inclusion of additional (“nonlinear”) symmetry generators (i.e. “Hamiltonians”) into this reformulation of (linear) QM leads to a considerable extension of the theory: two kinds of quantum “mixed states” should be distinguished, and operator ‐ valued functions of density matrices should be used in the r ˆ ole of “nonlinear observables”. A general framework for physical theories is obtained in this way: By different choices of the sets of “nonlinear observables” we obtain, as special cases, e.g. classical mechanics on homogeneous spaces of kinematical symmetry groups, standard (linear) QM, or nonlinear extensions of QM; also various “quasiclassical approximations” to QM are all subtheories of the presented extension of QM - a version of the extended quantum mechanics (EQM). A general interpretation scheme of EQM extending the usual statistical interpretation of QM is also proposed. Eventually, EQM is shown to be (included into) a C -algebraic (hence linear) quantum theory. Mathematical formulation of these theories is presented. The presentation includes an analysis of problems connected with differentiation on infinite ‐ dimensional manifolds, as well as a solution of some problems connected with the work with only densely defined unbounded real‐valued functions on the (infinite dimensional) “phase space” which correspond to unbounded operators (generators) and to their nonlinear generalizations. Also “nonlinear deformations” of unitary representations of kinematical symmetry Lie groups are introduced. Possible applications are briefly discussed, and some specific examples are presented. The text contains also brief reviews of Hamiltonian classical mechanics, as well as of QM. Mathematical appendices make the paper nearly selfcontained.