Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

European Journal of Physics

Calculating diffraction patterns

Frank Rioux

Published Mar 10, 2003• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Following Marcella’s approach to the double-slit experiment (Marcella T V 2002 Eur. J. Phys. 23 615–21), diffraction patterns for two-dimensional masks are calculated by Fourier transform of the Mask geometry into momentum space. Iw ish to describe a simple extension of Marcella’s [1] recent analysis of the double-slit experiment to two dimensions. The essential point Marcella makes in his unique treatment of this well-known experiment is that the diffraction pattern at the detection screen is actually a measurement of the momentum distribution of the diffracted particles. Therefore the calculate dd iffraction pattern is simply obtained from the Fourier transform of the coordinate space wavefunction (the doubleslit geometry) into momentum space. Marcella considered two spatial models: (model 1) infinitesimally thin slits represented by Dirac delta functions; and (model 2) slits of finite width. About 60 years ago Sir Lawrence Bragg [2] proposed the optical transform as an aid in the interpretation of the x-ray diffraction patterns of crystals. This required the fabrication of two-dimensional masks of various crystal or molecular geometries and the generation of the diffraction pattern using visible electromagnetic radiation. Present-day laser technology has made the generation of suc hd iffraction patterns routine, even in the classroom. In addition, Marcella’s computational approach makes calculating the diffraction patterns conceptually and mathematically straightforward. If one considers the mask as consisting of point scatterers (model 1), the coordinate space wavefunction is a linear superposition of the scattering positions: |� �= 1 √ N

DOI
10.1088/0143-0807/24/3/401

Related papers

10 “Quantum Interference with Slits ” Revisited

Tony Rothman, S. P. Boughn

Marcella has presented a straightforward technique employing the Dirac formalism to calculate single-and double-slit interference patterns.He claims that no reference is made to classical optics or scattering theory and that his method therefore provides a purely quantum mechanical description of these experiments.He also presents his calculation as if no approximations are employed.We show that he implicitly makes the same approximations found in classical treatments of interference and that no new physics has been introduced.At the same time, some of the quantum mechanical arguments Marcella gives are, at best, misleading.

•Jan 1, 2010•6 citations

‘Quantum interference with slits’ revisited

Tony Rothman, S. P. Boughn

Marcella [arXiv:quant-ph/0703126] has presented a straightforward technique employing the Dirac formalism to calculate single- and double-slit interference patterns. He claims that no reference is made to classical optics or scattering theory and that his method therefore provides a purely quantum mechanical description of these experiments. He also presents his calculation as if no approximations are employed. We show that he implicitly makes the same approximations found in classical treatments of interference and that no new physics has been introduced. At the same time, some of the quantum mechanical arguments Marcella gives are, at best, misleading.

arXiv:1009.2408•European Journal of Physics•Nov 25, 2010•4 citations

The Quantum Mechanics Description of Single-Silt Diffraction and the Uncertainty Relation

Yang Wang

Following Marcella's quantum mechanics description of the single-slit diffraction,the coordinate-space and momentum-space wave functions for an electron passing through the single-slit are derived,and then,the uncertainties of the position and momentum are reconsidered.

Journal of Southwest China Normal University•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

The classical double slit experiment–a study of the distribution of interference fringes formed on distant screens of varied shapes

Joseph Ivin Thomas

Abstract The double slit experiment was the first demonstrative proof of the wave nature of light. It was expounded by the English physician-physicist Thomas Young in 1801 and it soon helped lay to rest the then raging Newton–Huygens debate on whether light consisted of a fast-moving stream of particles or a train of progressive waves in the ether medium. In the experiment, light is made to pass through two very narrow slits spaced closely apart. A screen placed on the other side captures a pattern of alternating bright and dark bands called fringes which are formed as a result of the phenomenon of interference. In prior work by the same author, it was shown that the conventional analysis of Young’s experiment that is used in many introductory physics textbooks, suffers from a number of limitations in regards to its ability to accurately predict the positions of these fringes on the distant screen. This was owing to the adoption of some needless and paradoxical assumptions to help simplify the geometry of the slit barrier-screen arrangement. In the new analysis however, all such approximations were discarded and a hyperbola theorem was forwarded which was then suitably applied to determine the exact fringe positions on screens of varied shapes (linear, semi-circular, semi-elliptical). This paper further builds on that work by laying down the mathematical framework necessary for counting fringes and then comparing their distributions on differently shaped screens, using MATLAB software package for numerical–graphical simulation. In addition, a pair of equivalent laws of proportionality are predicted that govern the distribution of fringes independent of the shape of the detection screen employed.

European Journal of Physics•Jun 9, 2020•7 citations

The Classical Double Slit Interference Experiment: A New Geometrical Approach

Joseph Ivin Thomas

The double slit experiment was first conceived of by the English physician-physicist Thomas Young in 1801. It was the first demonstrative proof that light possesses a wave nature. In this experiment, light is made to pass through two very narrow slits that are spaced closely apart and a screen placed on the other side captures a pattern of alternating bright and dark stripes called fringes, formed as a result of the interference of ripples of light emanating from either slit. The relative positions and intensities of the fringes on the screen can be calculated by employing two assumptions that help simplify the geometry of the slit-screen arrangement. Firstly, the screen to slit distance is taken to be larger than the inter-slit distance (far field limit) and secondly, the inter-slit distance is taken to be larger than the wavelength of light. This conventional approach can account for the positions and intensities of the fringes located in the central portion of the screen with a fair degree of precision. It however, fails to account for those fringes located in the peripheral portions of the screen and also, is not applicable to the case wherein the screen to slit distance is made comparable to the inter-slit distance (near field limit). In this paper, the original analysis of Young’s Experiment is reformulated using an analytically derived hyperbola equation, which is formed from the locus of the points of intersections of two uniformly expanding circular wavefronts of light that emanate from either slit source. Additionally, the shape of the screen used to capture the interference pattern is varied (linear, semicircular, semielliptical) and the relative positions of the fringes is calculated for each case. This new approach bears the distinctive advantage that it is applicable in both the far field and the near field scenarios, and since no assumptions are made beyond the Huygens-Fresnel principle, it is therefore, a much more generalized approach. For these reasons, the author suggests that the new analysis ought to be introduced into the Wave Optics chapter of the undergraduate Physics curriculum.

American Journal of Optics and Photonics•Jan 1, 2019•15 citations

Single-slit diffraction and the Heisenberg principle for position and momentum

Winfrid Görlich, Ingo Hoffmann, Thomas Schürmann

Monochromatic light is prepared by a single slit of spatial width Δx. The diffraction pattern is considered to obtain the corresponding probability density of the momentum. Let P be the probability weight to measure a momentum in a finite window of width Δp. For small Δp the asymptotic law P ~ ΔxΔp/h is verified, while h is Planck's constant of action.

arXiv:0812.4775•Dec 27, 2008•0 citations
Following Marcella’s approach to the double-slit experiment (Marcella T V 2002 Eur. J. Phys. 23 615–21), diffraction patterns for two-dimensional masks are calculated by Fourier transform of the Mask geometry into momentum space. Iw ish to describe a simple extension of Marcella’s [1] recent analysis of the double-slit experiment to two dimensions. The essential point Marcella makes in his unique treatment of this well-known experiment is that the diffraction pattern at the detection screen is actually a measurement of the momentum distribution of the diffracted particles. Therefore the calculate dd iffraction pattern is simply obtained from the Fourier transform of the coordinate space wavefunction (the doubleslit geometry) into momentum space. Marcella considered two spatial models: (model 1) infinitesimally thin slits represented by Dirac delta functions; and (model 2) slits of finite width. About 60 years ago Sir Lawrence Bragg [2] proposed the optical transform as an aid in the interpretation of the x-ray diffraction patterns of crystals. This required the fabrication of two-dimensional masks of various crystal or molecular geometries and the generation of the diffraction pattern using visible electromagnetic radiation. Present-day laser technology has made the generation of suc hd iffraction patterns routine, even in the classroom. In addition, Marcella’s computational approach makes calculating the diffraction patterns conceptually and mathematically straightforward. If one considers the mask as consisting of point scatterers (model 1), the coordinate space wavefunction is a linear superposition of the scattering positions: |� �= 1 √ N
Marcella has presented a straightforward technique employing the Dirac formalism to calculate single-and double-slit interference patterns.He claims that no reference is made to classical optics or scattering theory and that his method therefore provides a purely quantum mechanical description of these experiments.He also presents his calculation as if no approximations are employed.We show that he implicitly makes the same approximations found in classical treatments of interference and that no new physics has been introduced.At the same time, some of the quantum mechanical arguments Marcella gives are, at best, misleading.
Marcella [arXiv:quant-ph/0703126] has presented a straightforward technique employing the Dirac formalism to calculate single- and double-slit interference patterns. He claims that no reference is made to classical optics or scattering theory and that his method therefore provides a purely quantum mechanical description of these experiments. He also presents his calculation as if no approximations are employed. We show that he implicitly makes the same approximations found in classical treatments of interference and that no new physics has been introduced. At the same time, some of the quantum mechanical arguments Marcella gives are, at best, misleading.
Abstract The double slit experiment was the first demonstrative proof of the wave nature of light. It was expounded by the English physician-physicist Thomas Young in 1801 and it soon helped lay to rest the then raging Newton–Huygens debate on whether light consisted of a fast-moving stream of particles or a train of progressive waves in the ether medium. In the experiment, light is made to pass through two very narrow slits spaced closely apart. A screen placed on the other side captures a pattern of alternating bright and dark bands called fringes which are formed as a result of the phenomenon of interference. In prior work by the same author, it was shown that the conventional analysis of Young’s experiment that is used in many introductory physics textbooks, suffers from a number of limitations in regards to its ability to accurately predict the positions of these fringes on the distant screen. This was owing to the adoption of some needless and paradoxical assumptions to help simplify the geometry of the slit barrier-screen arrangement. In the new analysis however, all such approximations were discarded and a hyperbola theorem was forwarded which was then suitably applied to determine the exact fringe positions on screens of varied shapes (linear, semi-circular, semi-elliptical). This paper further builds on that work by laying down the mathematical framework necessary for counting fringes and then comparing their distributions on differently shaped screens, using MATLAB software package for numerical–graphical simulation. In addition, a pair of equivalent laws of proportionality are predicted that govern the distribution of fringes independent of the shape of the detection screen employed.
The double slit experiment was first conceived of by the English physician-physicist Thomas Young in 1801. It was the first demonstrative proof that light possesses a wave nature. In this experiment, light is made to pass through two very narrow slits that are spaced closely apart and a screen placed on the other side captures a pattern of alternating bright and dark stripes called fringes, formed as a result of the interference of ripples of light emanating from either slit. The relative positions and intensities of the fringes on the screen can be calculated by employing two assumptions that help simplify the geometry of the slit-screen arrangement. Firstly, the screen to slit distance is taken to be larger than the inter-slit distance (far field limit) and secondly, the inter-slit distance is taken to be larger than the wavelength of light. This conventional approach can account for the positions and intensities of the fringes located in the central portion of the screen with a fair degree of precision. It however, fails to account for those fringes located in the peripheral portions of the screen and also, is not applicable to the case wherein the screen to slit distance is made comparable to the inter-slit distance (near field limit). In this paper, the original analysis of Young’s Experiment is reformulated using an analytically derived hyperbola equation, which is formed from the locus of the points of intersections of two uniformly expanding circular wavefronts of light that emanate from either slit source. Additionally, the shape of the screen used to capture the interference pattern is varied (linear, semicircular, semielliptical) and the relative positions of the fringes is calculated for each case. This new approach bears the distinctive advantage that it is applicable in both the far field and the near field scenarios, and since no assumptions are made beyond the Huygens-Fresnel principle, it is therefore, a much more generalized approach. For these reasons, the author suggests that the new analysis ought to be introduced into the Wave Optics chapter of the undergraduate Physics curriculum.