Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications

Analysis of coherent anomalies, scaling exponent and confluent singularities for spin-S Ising model on cubic nets

Shiladitya Sardar, K.G. Chakraborty

Published Apr 1, 1997• 20 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0378-4371(96)00443-8

Related papers

Coherent anomalies and critical singularities of the generalized Ising model

Shiladitya Sardar, K.G. Chakraborty

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Oct 1, 1993•4 citations

Coherent-Anomaly Analysis with Cluster Variation Method for Spin-Pair Correlation Function of Ising Model on Square Lattice

Kazuyuki Tanaka, Tsuyoshi Horiguchi, Tohru Morita

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Sep 1, 1995•0 citations

High-temperature series for the susceptibility of the spin- s Ising model: Analysis of confluent singularities

William J. Camp, John P. VAN DYKE

We have extended the series for the zero-field susceptibility of the spin-$s$ Ising model through tenth order in the reduced inverse temperature $K$ on the square, triangular, simple-cubic, body-centered-cubic, and face-centered-cubic lattices. The series coefficients ${h}_{n}(s)$ are expressed as simple polynomials in $X=s(s+1)$. Using extended methods of analysis we have estimated the nature of the leading singularities on the face-centered lattice and conclude with good confidence that the susceptibility exponent ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{1}$ equals 1.25, independent of $s$. The exponent of the leading correction term is estimated to be ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{2}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.75\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.08$ in good agreement with renormalization-group theory. For $s=\frac{1}{2}$ only, the amplitude of the confluent correction apparently vanishes. We have also studied the leading singularities on the triangular lattice and conclude that ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{1}=\frac{7}{4}$, independent of $s$, with, however, much stronger corrections than in three dimensions. These results provide a very strong corroboration of the universality hypothesis.

Physical review. B, Solid state•Apr 1, 1975•148 citations

Series analysis of corrections to scaling for the spin-pair correlations of the spin- s Ising model: Confluent singularities, universality, and hyperscaling

William J. Camp, D. M. Saul, John P. VAN DYKE +1 more

We report a detailed study of twelve-term, high-temperature series for the second moment of spin-pair correlations ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{2}(t)$ and the specific heat ${c}_{H}(t)$ of the nearest-neighbor spin-$s$ Ising model in zero magnetic field on the fcc lattice. Near criticality we find ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{2}(t)={A}_{2}(s)t{(s)}^{\ensuremath{-}(\ensuremath{\gamma}+2\ensuremath{\nu})}[1 + {B}_{2}(s)t{(s)}^{{\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{1}}+ \ensuremath{\cdots}]$, {$t(s)=\frac{[T\ensuremath{-}{T}_{c}(s)]}{T}$}, showing a confluent correction to the dominant scaling singularity. To within uncertainties the exponents have the universal (i.e., spin-independent) values $\ensuremath{\nu}={0.638}_{\ensuremath{-}0.008}^{+0.002}$ (with $\ensuremath{\gamma}={1.250}_{\ensuremath{-}0.007}^{+0.003}$) and ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{1}=0.6\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.1$. The confluent exponent ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{1}$ is in reasonable agreement with the correction-to-scaling index derived from earlier analysis of the susceptibility, as predicted by renormalization-group arguments. A similar analysis of the specific heat ${c}_{H}$ for the same model finds no detectable confluent singularities in rather noisy, high-temperature series and gives $\ensuremath{\alpha}=0.125\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.020$ in general confirmation of earlier $s=\frac{1}{2}$ estimates. With $\ensuremath{\nu}$ as quoted above the hyperscaling relation $d\ensuremath{\nu}=2\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\alpha}$ at $d=3$ requires $\ensuremath{\alpha}={0.086}_{\ensuremath{-}0.006}^{+0.024}$ so the validity of hyperscaling remains problematical.

Physical review. B, Solid state•Nov 1, 1976•91 citations

Accurate estimates of 3D Ising critical exponents using the coherent-anomaly method

Miroslav Kolesik, Masuo Suzuki

arXiv:cond-mat/9411109•Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Apr 1, 1995•23 citations

The mean size of Ising clusters: a confluent singularity analysis

David S. Gaunt, R Brak

The authors re-examine, using a confluent singularity analysis, existing low-temperature series for the mean size of finite clusters for the pure spin- 1 / 2 nearest-neighbour Ising model in two dimensions. Although the triangular lattice is problematical, results for the honeycomb and square lattices may be interpreted as indicating a dominant exponent theta =1.87+or-0.04 (consistent with the theoretical prediction theta = gamma + beta ), together with competing analytic and non-analytic ( Delta 1 =1.35+or-0.25) correction-to-scaling terms.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Oct 1, 1985•2 citations
We have extended the series for the zero-field susceptibility of the spin-sss Ising model through tenth order in the reduced inverse temperature KKK on the square, triangular, simple-cubic, body-centered-cubic, and face-centered-cubic lattices. The series coefficients hn(s){h}_{n}(s)hn​(s) are expressed as simple polynomials in X=s(s+1)X=s(s+1)X=s(s+1). Using extended methods of analysis we have estimated the nature of the leading singularities on the face-centered lattice and conclude with good confidence that the susceptibility exponent ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{1}$ equals 1.25, independent of sss. The exponent of the leading correction term is estimated to be ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{2}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.75\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.08$ in good agreement with renormalization-group theory. For s=12s=\frac{1}{2}s=21​ only, the amplitude of the confluent correction apparently vanishes. We have also studied the leading singularities on the triangular lattice and conclude that ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{1}=\frac{7}{4}$, independent of sss, with, however, much stronger corrections than in three dimensions. These results provide a very strong corroboration of the universality hypothesis.
We report a detailed study of twelve-term, high-temperature series for the second moment of spin-pair correlations ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{2}(t)$ and the specific heat cH(t){c}_{H}(t)cH​(t) of the nearest-neighbor spin-sss Ising model in zero magnetic field on the fcc lattice. Near criticality we find ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{2}(t)={A}_{2}(s)t{(s)}^{\ensuremath{-}(\ensuremath{\gamma}+2\ensuremath{\nu})}[1 + {B}_{2}(s)t{(s)}^{{\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{1}}+ \ensuremath{\cdots}]$, {$t(s)=\frac{[T\ensuremath{-}{T}_{c}(s)]}{T}$}, showing a confluent correction to the dominant scaling singularity. To within uncertainties the exponents have the universal (i.e., spin-independent) values $\ensuremath{\nu}={0.638}_{\ensuremath{-}0.008}^{+0.002}$ (with $\ensuremath{\gamma}={1.250}_{\ensuremath{-}0.007}^{+0.003}$) and ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{1}=0.6\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.1$. The confluent exponent ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{1}$ is in reasonable agreement with the correction-to-scaling index derived from earlier analysis of the susceptibility, as predicted by renormalization-group arguments. A similar analysis of the specific heat cH{c}_{H}cH​ for the same model finds no detectable confluent singularities in rather noisy, high-temperature series and gives $\ensuremath{\alpha}=0.125\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.020$ in general confirmation of earlier s=12s=\frac{1}{2}s=21​ estimates. With $\ensuremath{\nu}$ as quoted above the hyperscaling relation $d\ensuremath{\nu}=2\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\alpha}$ at d=3d=3d=3 requires $\ensuremath{\alpha}={0.086}_{\ensuremath{-}0.006}^{+0.024}$ so the validity of hyperscaling remains problematical.
The authors re-examine, using a confluent singularity analysis, existing low-temperature series for the mean size of finite clusters for the pure spin- 1 / 2 nearest-neighbour Ising model in two dimensions. Although the triangular lattice is problematical, results for the honeycomb and square lattices may be interpreted as indicating a dominant exponent theta =1.87+or-0.04 (consistent with the theoretical prediction theta = gamma + beta ), together with competing analytic and non-analytic ( Delta 1 =1.35+or-0.25) correction-to-scaling terms.