In quantum mechanics the linear harmonic oscillator representatives of the canonical observables q and p are certain well-known infinite square matrices, qmn and pmn, with denumerable sets of rows and columns. It is pedagogically useful to investigate various problems which arise when one considers the finite matrices Qmn and Pmn which result when qmn and pmn are truncated after the Nth row and column, where N( 2≥2) is some preassigned positive integer. So that the enquiry may be more instructive, it begins with an abstract formulation of the problem of the “truncated harmonic oscillator.” Formally, the latter has the usual Hamiltonian H = 12( Q2+P2 ) , but Q and P are not canonical—their commutator [Q,P] now differing from i by a certain projection operator. The spectrum of H and the (finite) basis { |n〉} generated by H are found by standard methods, though there are now some complications which are absent from the theory of the linear harmonic oscillator. The diagonalization of Q and P presents no difficulties if full use is made of the classical theory of Hermite polynomials. The spectrum of Q is the set of N zeros hs of the Nth Hermite polynomial. Although the wavefunctions 〈 Q′|n〉 are therefore functions of the discrete variable hs, one can formally contemplate them as functions of a continuous real variable h; and some curious intimations of Schrödinger representation appear. The analog of a component of orbital angular momentum is considered, and its spectrum obtained. Finally, the asymptotic limit N → ∞ is briefly discussed, in order thus explicitly to dispel the impression that this limit might somehow represent the “usual” linear harmonic oscillator.
In quantum mechanics the linear harmonic oscillator representatives of the canonical observables q and p are certain well-known infinite square matrices, qmn and pmn, with denumerable sets of rows and columns. It is pedagogically useful to investigate various problems which arise when one considers the finite matrices Qmn and Pmn which result when qmn and pmn are truncated after the Nth row and column, where N( 2≥2) is some preassigned positive integer. So that the enquiry may be more instructive, it begins with an abstract formulation of the problem of the “truncated harmonic oscillator.” Formally, the latter has the usual Hamiltonian H = 12( Q2+P2 ) , but Q and P are not canonical—their commutator [Q,P] now differing from i by a certain projection operator. The spectrum of H and the (finite) basis { |n〉} generated by H are found by standard methods, though there are now some complications which are absent from the theory of the linear harmonic oscillator. The diagonalization of Q and P presents no difficulties if full use is made of the classical theory of Hermite polynomials. The spectrum of Q is the set of N zeros hs of the Nth Hermite polynomial. Although the wavefunctions 〈 Q′|n〉 are therefore functions of the discrete variable hs, one can formally contemplate them as functions of a continuous real variable h; and some curious intimations of Schrödinger representation appear. The analog of a component of orbital angular momentum is considered, and its spectrum obtained. Finally, the asymptotic limit N → ∞ is briefly discussed, in order thus explicitly to dispel the impression that this limit might somehow represent the “usual” linear harmonic oscillator.
We construct a new model of the quantum oscillator, whose energy spectrum is equally-spaced and lower-bound, whereas the spectra of position and of momentum are a denumerable non-degenerate set of points in [− 1, 1] that depends on the deformation parameter q ∊ (0, 1). We provide its explicit wavefunctions, both in position and momentum representations, in terms of the discrete q -Hermite polynomials. We build a Hilbert space with a unique measure, where an analogue of the fractional Fourier transform is defined in order to govern the time evolution of this discrete oscillator. In the limit when q → 1 − , one recovers the ordinary quantum harmonic oscillator.
The goal of Quantum Mechanics I, A Problem Text, is to enable students to solve problems appropriate to their first course in quantum mechanics. Significantly detailed solutions to traditionally posed problems dominate. Theory and rationale are addressed in prescript and postscript narratives and/or within the solved problems to guide students; and clarify vocabulary, symbology, and terminology. Applications of the postulates are presented initially using arguments from linear algebra appropriate to discrete systems with low-dimensional vectors and matrix operators, introducing orthogonality, orthonormality, Hermiticity, eigenvectors, eigenvalues, probability, expectation value, and degeneracy. These arguments blend into infinite-dimensional vectors and operators, and calculus-based arguments for continuous systems where delta functions, theta functions, and Fourier transforms are initially discussed. Dirac notation is fully developed within these first five chapters. Chapter six discusses Ehrenfest’s theorem, the Heisenberg uncertainty relations, and Gaussian wave functions and wave packets. Increasingly sophisticated potential energy functions are then treated to include the free particle, the infinite square well, the one-dimensional scattering state, the simple harmonic oscillator, the finite square well, orbital angular momentum, and the hydrogen atom. Ladder operators are featured in the developments of the simple harmonic oscillator and orbital angular momentum. The diversity of narratives and detailed solutions intend
Angle and action operators (w, j) for the simple harmonic oscillator are treated as resulting from a canonical transformation of coordinate and momentum operators (q, k) generated by a one-sided unitary operator U such that U†U = 1 and UU† commutes with k but not with q. From the discrete spectrum of the number operator n, eigenvectors |η〉 are constructed for every real value of η; the set {|η〉} is complete and orthogonal. Another complete set {|W〉} is obtained, consisting of the Fourier transforms of the kets in the set {|η〉}. The angle operator is w=U†qU=∫dW |W〉 W 〈W|. The set {|W〉} is not orthogonal; |W〉 is not an eigenvector of w. If v is defined as ∫dW|W〉exp (−2πiW) 〈W|, then the creation and destruction operators are given by a = vn½, a† = n½v†. v is a one-sided unitary operator such that vv† = 1, but v†v = 1 − |0〉 〈0|, where |0〉 is the ground state of the oscillator; v and v† are similar to the operators E- and E+ of Carruthers and Nieto. The Weyl transforms of w and j = 2πℏ(n + ½1) are the classical angle and action variables of the oscillator. The Weyl transform is formulated in terms of the coherent states of the oscillator. A time operator canonical to the Hamiltonian is defined as t = 2πw/ω (ω/2π = frequency). The observables for the oscillator are also given in the Heisenberg picture and their classical limits are considered.
The finite q -oscillator is a model that obeys the dynamics of the harmonic oscillator, with the operators of position, momentum and Hamiltonian being functions of elements of the q -algebra su q (2). The spectrum of position in this discrete system, in a fixed representation j , consists of 2 j + 1 'sensor'-points , and similarly for the momentum observable. The spectrum of energies is finite and equally spaced, so the system supports coherent states. The wavefunctions involve dual q -Kravchuk polynomials, which are solutions to a finite-difference Schrödinger equation. Time evolution (times a phase) defines the fractional Fourier– q -Kravchuk transform. In the classical limit as q → 1 we recover the finite oscillator Lie algebra, the N = 2 j → ∞ limit returns the Macfarlane–Biedenharn q -oscillator and both limits contract the generators to the standard quantum-mechanical harmonic oscillator.
Elementary treatments of a single angular momentum having components Jk (k =1, 2, 3) usually go as far as discussions of the spectra of these operators and the derivations of their standard, i.e., J2, J3-diagonal, representatives. On the other hand, the standard representatives of their eigenvectors are not usually obtained, leaving J3 aside, for which the problem is trivial. In fact, this part of the theory is most often dealt with only after a lengthy excursion into the theory of matrix representations. The representatives in question are obtained, in the first part of this paper, by means of essentially elementary arguments. Once these representatives are known, the standard representative of the unitary operator U which generates the state vector of a system after it has undergone a rotation R from the state vector prior to the rotation are deduced; this representative comprises just the familiar matrix representations of the rotation group. Finally, the relevance of harmonic oscillator theory to the present problem is briefly considered.
This study presents a complete algebraic formulation of the quantum harmonic oscillator, demonstrating that the Hermite polynomials, H n ( x ) , emerge as the fundamental solution when the power-series method is applied to the Schrödinger equation. The physical requirement of square integrability enforces the truncation of the series, leading precisely to these polynomials, which constitute the polynomial part of the energy eigenfunctions, ψ n ( x )= N n H n ( αx ) e − α 2 x 2 /2 , where n is the quantum number. This quantum number directly determines the quantized energy levels through E n =ℏω( n+ 1 2 ) . The analysis based on creation and annihilation operators further reveals that the action of the creation operator on the ground state generates the excited states along with their corresponding Hermite functions. The orthogonality of these polynomials ensures the orthonormality of the complete set of eigenfunctions. Additionally, the geometric Berry phase emerges as a natural extension when the system undergoes adiabatic cyclic changes, revealing a deeper topological structure that complements the conventional algebraic and analytic descriptions. Therefore, Hermite polynomials encapsulate both the mathematical structure and the physical essence of quantization in this fundamental system.