Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nature

Correlation Between Photons, in Coherent Beams of Light, Detected by a Coincidence Counting Technique

R. Q. Twiss, A. G. Little, Robert Hanbury Brown

Published Aug 1, 1957• 92 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/180324a0

Related papers

Studies of the detection of optical coherence using a coincidence counting technique

Nigel D. Haig

•Jan 1, 1969•0 citations

Detection of squeezed states by cross correlation

Z. Y. Ou, C. K. Hong, L. Mandeļ

A new method for detecting a squeezed state by coincidence counting or cross correlation of the signals from two photodetectors is proposed. The two light beams falling on the two detectors are obtained from the two outputs of a homodyne beam splitter, whose inputs are the squeezed light and the local oscillator beam. With fast detectors the squeezing gives rise to excess photon coincidence counts. When a spectral analysis of the photoelectric currents is made, squeezing shows up as a positive cross correlation between the two signals, whereas unsqueezed light always produces negative correlations. Although the technique does not always cause the effects of local oscillator fluctuations to cancel out, as does the method of Yuen and Chan [Opt. Lett. B8R, 177 (1983)], they cancel in special cases, and the method has the advantage of being largely unaffected by detector after-pulsing. A simple combination of autocorrelation and cross-correlation measurements yields the degree of squeezing.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1987•30 citations

The Question of Correlation between Photons in Coherent Beams of Light

Peter Berners Fellgett

Nature•May 1, 1957•25 citations

The Detection of Time-correlated Photons by a Coincidence Counter

R. Q. Twiss, A. G. Little

The existence of a correlation between the arrival times of photons has been confirmed by measurements with a coincidence counter having a resolving time of 3·5 X 10-9 sec in three different experiments. In the first experiment it was found that the number of coincidence counts recorded from two photomultipliers, the apertures of which were optically superimposed, was significantly greater than when the light beams were incoherent. Furthermore, the number of these correlated counts was in satisfactory agreement with that predicted by theory. In the second experiment the change in the number of excess coincidences was measured as the degree of coherence of the light was altered by increasing the apparent separation of the photocathodes, and in this case also there was reasonable agreement between theory and experiment. In the final experiment it was shown that there was a significant difference between the number of coincidences observed when the light beams were in identical as opposed to orthogonal polarizations, and this last result especially makes it extremely improbable that the correlation could be caused by some spurious effect, such as plasma oscillations in the source, since the light source itself was found to be completely unpolarized.

Australian Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 1959•37 citations

The Question of Correlation between Photons in Coherent Beams of Light

R. Q. Twiss, Robert Hanbury Brown

Nature•Jun 1, 1957•23 citations

Correlation between Photons in Two Coherent Beams of Light

R. Hanbury-Brown, R. Q. Twiss

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1983•5 citations
A new method for detecting a squeezed state by coincidence counting or cross correlation of the signals from two photodetectors is proposed. The two light beams falling on the two detectors are obtained from the two outputs of a homodyne beam splitter, whose inputs are the squeezed light and the local oscillator beam. With fast detectors the squeezing gives rise to excess photon coincidence counts. When a spectral analysis of the photoelectric currents is made, squeezing shows up as a positive cross correlation between the two signals, whereas unsqueezed light always produces negative correlations. Although the technique does not always cause the effects of local oscillator fluctuations to cancel out, as does the method of Yuen and Chan [Opt. Lett. B8R, 177 (1983)], they cancel in special cases, and the method has the advantage of being largely unaffected by detector after-pulsing. A simple combination of autocorrelation and cross-correlation measurements yields the degree of squeezing.
The existence of a correlation between the arrival times of photons has been confirmed by measurements with a coincidence counter having a resolving time of 3·5 X 10-9 sec in three different experiments. In the first experiment it was found that the number of coincidence counts recorded from two photomultipliers, the apertures of which were optically superimposed, was significantly greater than when the light beams were incoherent. Furthermore, the number of these correlated counts was in satisfactory agreement with that predicted by theory. In the second experiment the change in the number of excess coincidences was measured as the degree of coherence of the light was altered by increasing the apparent separation of the photocathodes, and in this case also there was reasonable agreement between theory and experiment. In the final experiment it was shown that there was a significant difference between the number of coincidences observed when the light beams were in identical as opposed to orthogonal polarizations, and this last result especially makes it extremely improbable that the correlation could be caused by some spurious effect, such as plasma oscillations in the source, since the light source itself was found to be completely unpolarized.