Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

Causally symmetric Bohm model

Roderick I. Sutherland

Published Aug 4, 2008• 86 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.04.004

Related papers

Aharonov-Bohm effect versus causality?

T. Troudet

Physics Letters A•Sep 1, 1985•7 citations

Locality, Causality, and the Aharonov‐Bohm Effect

Peter Holland

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences•Dec 1, 1986•2 citations

Growing Recognition of Bohm’s Causal Interpretation

Chris Talbot

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2017•1 citation

Causally Symmetric Bohm Model

Roderick I. Sutherland

A version of Bohm's model incorporating retrocausality is presented, the aim being to explain the nonlocality of Bell's theorem while maintaining Lorentz invariance in the underlying ontology. The strengths and weaknesses of this alternative model are compared with those of the standard Bohm model.

arXiv:quant-ph/0601095•Jan 15, 2006•7 citations

Generalized Aharonov-Bohm Effect

Ghislain Golse, Hamza Jirari, H. Kröger +1 more

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations

Probabilities and Certainties Within a Causally Symmetric Model

Roderick I. Sutherland

Abstract This paper is concerned with the causally symmetric version of the familiar de Broglie–Bohm interpretation, this version allowing the spacelike nonlocality and the configuration space ontology of the original model to be avoided via the addition of retrocausality. Two different features of this alternative formulation are considered here. With regard to probabilities, it is shown that the model provides a derivation of the Born rule identical to that in Bohm’s original formulation. This derivation holds just as well for a many-particle, entangled state as for a single particle. With regard to “certainties”, the description of a particle’s spin is examined within the model and it is seen that a statistical description is no longer necessary once final boundary conditions are specified in addition to the usual initial state, with the particle then possessing a definite (but hidden) value for every spin component at intermediate times. These values are consistent with being the components of a single, underlying spin vector. The case of a two-particle entangled spin state is also examined and it is found that, due to the retrocausal aspect, each particle possesses its own definite spin during the entanglement, independent of the other particle. In formulating this picture, it is demonstrated how such a realistic model can preserve Lorentz invariance in the face of Bell’s theorem and avoid the need for a preferred reference frame.

arXiv:2112.10022•Foundations of Physics•Jul 7, 2022•6 citations
Abstract This paper is concerned with the causally symmetric version of the familiar de Broglie–Bohm interpretation, this version allowing the spacelike nonlocality and the configuration space ontology of the original model to be avoided via the addition of retrocausality. Two different features of this alternative formulation are considered here. With regard to probabilities, it is shown that the model provides a derivation of the Born rule identical to that in Bohm’s original formulation. This derivation holds just as well for a many-particle, entangled state as for a single particle. With regard to “certainties”, the description of a particle’s spin is examined within the model and it is seen that a statistical description is no longer necessary once final boundary conditions are specified in addition to the usual initial state, with the particle then possessing a definite (but hidden) value for every spin component at intermediate times. These values are consistent with being the components of a single, underlying spin vector. The case of a two-particle entangled spin state is also examined and it is found that, due to the retrocausal aspect, each particle possesses its own definite spin during the entanglement, independent of the other particle. In formulating this picture, it is demonstrated how such a realistic model can preserve Lorentz invariance in the face of Bell’s theorem and avoid the need for a preferred reference frame.