Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica C Superconductivity

Competition between hole pairing and phase separation in a one-dimesional analog of the two-dimensional t-J model

P. Wróbel, R. Eder

Published Dec 1, 1994• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0921-4534(94)92328-0

Related papers

Phase Transition in the Two-Dimesional Classical XY Model

J. K. Kim

Springer proceedings in physics•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations

On the nature of pairing in the two-dimensional t–J model

Thomas Maier

Physica B Condensed Matter•Feb 15, 2005•8 citations

One-dimensionalt-Jand Hubbard models in a staggered field

Peter Prelovšek, Igor Sega, J. Bonča +2 more

The influence of the staggered magnetic field h on properties of the one-dimensional t-J and Hubbard models with nearly half-filled bands are studied. Using the exact diagonalization method for small systems as well as analytical approaches possible in the anisotropic model and for h\ensuremath{\gg}t, we determine the phase diagram of the t-J-h model at low doping, which displays three different regimes: the phase with repelling holes for J${\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{c}}$, the phase with paired holes for ${\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{c}}$J${\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{s}}$, and the phase separation for J>${\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{s}}$. Employing for h\ensuremath{\ne}0 the analogy with the universal behavior of one-dimensional interacting fermions within the Luther-Emery regime, we calculate the charge exponent ${\mathit{K}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\rho}}}$, which can be ${\mathit{K}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\rho}}}$>1 in the pairing regime, indicating dominant superconducting fluctuations. An analogous analysis, in particular the perturbation expansion in t/h, performed for the Hubbard t-U-h model shows a phase of stable hole pairs for U${\mathit{U}}_{\mathit{c}}$. Again ${\mathit{K}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\rho}}}$ seems to approach a nonuniversal value at half-filling.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•May 1, 1993•4 citations

Generalized one-dimensionalt-Jmodels with longer-range spin exchange

J. Bonča, Peter Prelovšek

The behavior of holes in the one-dimensional (1D) t-J model differs substantially from the one in planar correlated systems. We show that within the 1D model one can recover some essential properties of 2D systems by including longer-range spin exchange. Be means of analytical calculations for the anisotropic exchange and the exact diagonalization of small systems, it is established that this generalization leads to the large mass enhancement for a single hole, to the hole binding at strongly reduced J/t, and to substantial changes in the phase diagram at electron densities n\ensuremath{\lesssim}1. It is shown that the longer spin exchange changes qualitatively the phase-separation line ${\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{c}}$(n), which obtains an n dependence analogous to the 2D systems, i.e., opposite to the one in the 1D t-J model. The correlation exponent ${\mathit{K}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\rho}}}$ calculated in the Luttinger-liquid regime J${\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{c}}$(n) indicates also that the region of dominant pairing correlations can move even to J/t1.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Sep 1, 1992•2 citations

Phase separation in the two-dimensional t–J model

C. T. Shih, Y. C. Chen, T. K. Lee

Physica C Superconductivity•Nov 1, 2001•0 citations

Phase separation and three-site hopping in the two-dimensional t-J model

Elisa Ercolessi, P. Pieri, M. Roncaglia

arXiv:cond-mat/9701181•Physics Letters A•Sep 1, 1997•6 citations
The influence of the staggered magnetic field h on properties of the one-dimensional t-J and Hubbard models with nearly half-filled bands are studied. Using the exact diagonalization method for small systems as well as analytical approaches possible in the anisotropic model and for h\ensuremath{\gg}t, we determine the phase diagram of the t-J-h model at low doping, which displays three different regimes: the phase with repelling holes for JJc{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{c}}Jc​, the phase with paired holes for Jc{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{c}}Jc​JJs{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{s}}Js​, and the phase separation for J>Js{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{s}}Js​. Employing for h\ensuremath{\ne}0 the analogy with the universal behavior of one-dimensional interacting fermions within the Luther-Emery regime, we calculate the charge exponent ${\mathit{K}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\rho}}}$, which can be ${\mathit{K}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\rho}}}$>1 in the pairing regime, indicating dominant superconducting fluctuations. An analogous analysis, in particular the perturbation expansion in t/h, performed for the Hubbard t-U-h model shows a phase of stable hole pairs for UUc{\mathit{U}}_{\mathit{c}}Uc​. Again ${\mathit{K}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\rho}}}$ seems to approach a nonuniversal value at half-filling.
The behavior of holes in the one-dimensional (1D) t-J model differs substantially from the one in planar correlated systems. We show that within the 1D model one can recover some essential properties of 2D systems by including longer-range spin exchange. Be means of analytical calculations for the anisotropic exchange and the exact diagonalization of small systems, it is established that this generalization leads to the large mass enhancement for a single hole, to the hole binding at strongly reduced J/t, and to substantial changes in the phase diagram at electron densities n\ensuremath{\lesssim}1. It is shown that the longer spin exchange changes qualitatively the phase-separation line Jc{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{c}}Jc​(n), which obtains an n dependence analogous to the 2D systems, i.e., opposite to the one in the 1D t-J model. The correlation exponent ${\mathit{K}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\rho}}}$ calculated in the Luttinger-liquid regime JJc{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{c}}Jc​(n) indicates also that the region of dominant pairing correlations can move even to J/t1.