Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Physical versus Historical Reality

Henry Margenau

Published Jan 1, 1978• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-009-9845-2_15

Related papers

Physical Reality

Max Born

The Philosophical Quarterly•Apr 1, 1953•68 citations

The Historical Attractor Theory, Structural Formulation of a Foundational Principle for Physical Reality

sergio leonardo Pradal

We introduce the Historical Attractor Theory (HAT), a foundational framework in which physical reality is defined at the level of complete histories rather than instantaneous states. Within this approach, realizability is determined by a global criterion of historical stability, encoded in a scalar functional that orders histories according to their degree of openness. Physical reality corresponds to histories that satisfy a strict closure condition, suppressing incompatible alternatives without invoking fundamental time, dynamical collapse, or observer-dependent postulates. Quantum, classical, thermodynamic, and geometric descriptions emerge as effective regimes operating within historically stabilized narratives. HAT provides a unified structural principle that reorganizes central problems in the foundations of physics by shifting the focus from state-based dynamics to global historical consistency.

•Jan 21, 2026•0 citations

The Nature of Quantum Paradoxes Italian Studies in the Foundations and Philosophy of Modern Physics

Gino Tarozzi, Alwyn van der Merwe

The Italian Debate on Quantum Paradoxes.- 1. The Epistemological Roots of Quantum Paradoxes.- Waves, Particles and Complementarity.- Chance: Chaos or Logic?.- Some Critical Considerations on the Present Epistemological and Scientific Debate on Quantum Mechanics.- 2. Einstein Locauty, Separable Reality, and Quantum Correlations.- Physical Consequences of Reality Criteria for Quantum Phenomena.- Possible Link Between EPR Paradox and Waves.- A Criticism of Some Recently Proposed Models that Violate the Bell Inequality.- A Phenomenological Analysis of the EPR Argument.- 3. Causal and Deterministic Interpretations of Quantum Formausm.- Causal versus Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.- Perspectives of Physical Determinism.- Determinism, Separability, and Quantum Mechanics.- 4. Quantum Theory and Gravitation.- Can Singularities and Multidimensional Spaces Influence the Evolution of Quantum Mechanical Systems?.- Subquantum Mechanics and Graviton Blas.- 5. Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics.- Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. A Quantum Probabilistic Approach.- On the Adequacy of a Nonclassical Logic for Quantum Theory.- Remarks on the Hypothesis of Hidden Variables.- 6. Historical Developments of the Einstein-Bohr Controversy.- Historical Considerations on the Conceptual Experiment by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen.- Continuity and Discontinuity: The Einstein-Bohr Conflict of Ideas and the Bohr-Fock Discussion.- How Italian Philosophy Reacted to the Advent of Quantum Mechanics in the Thirties.- Italian Studies in the Foundations of Quantum Physics. A Bibliography (1965-1985).

Kluwer Academic Pub. eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•4 citations

PHYSICAL REALITY

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•May 1, 1991•0 citations

The Compressed Reality Hypothesis: Reconstructing the Foundations of Physics via Schrödinger's Wavefunction as Minimal Mathematical Encoding

Jincheng Zhang

The foundation of quantum mechanics in the early twentieth century marked a paradigm shift in our understanding of nature. In the historical trajectory, Erwin Schrödinger introduced the wave equation to describe micro-particles, but Max Born's subsequent probabilistic interpretation—defining the squared modulus of the wavefunction as a probability density—became the cornerstone of the Copenhagen interpretation, embedding intrinsic randomness into physical ontology. This paper investigates a counterfactual historical proposition: What if Schrödinger had firmly rejected the probabilistic interpretation at the outset and instead proposed that "the wavefunction is not a probability distribution, but the minimal mathematical encoding of physical reality"? We construct the ontological and mathematical-philosophical framework of "Compressed Reality Theory" (CRT), tracing how this alternative historical path would have accelerated the early development of quantum information, holographic principles, and quantum gravity. Under this paradigm, the central inquiry of physics shifts from "Where is the particle?" to "How much information is required to fully describe a reality?" By resolving the measurement paradox as a deterministic decompression mechanism rather than a subjective collapse, this thought experiment demonstrates how an information-centric ontology provides a unified, continuous, and deterministic picture bridging quantum phenomena and spacetime geometry.

•Jul 24, 2026•0 citations

Physical Reality

Max Born

Princeton University Press eBooks•Dec 8, 2020•0 citations
We introduce the Historical Attractor Theory (HAT), a foundational framework in which physical reality is defined at the level of complete histories rather than instantaneous states. Within this approach, realizability is determined by a global criterion of historical stability, encoded in a scalar functional that orders histories according to their degree of openness. Physical reality corresponds to histories that satisfy a strict closure condition, suppressing incompatible alternatives without invoking fundamental time, dynamical collapse, or observer-dependent postulates. Quantum, classical, thermodynamic, and geometric descriptions emerge as effective regimes operating within historically stabilized narratives. HAT provides a unified structural principle that reorganizes central problems in the foundations of physics by shifting the focus from state-based dynamics to global historical consistency.
The Italian Debate on Quantum Paradoxes.- 1. The Epistemological Roots of Quantum Paradoxes.- Waves, Particles and Complementarity.- Chance: Chaos or Logic?.- Some Critical Considerations on the Present Epistemological and Scientific Debate on Quantum Mechanics.- 2. Einstein Locauty, Separable Reality, and Quantum Correlations.- Physical Consequences of Reality Criteria for Quantum Phenomena.- Possible Link Between EPR Paradox and Waves.- A Criticism of Some Recently Proposed Models that Violate the Bell Inequality.- A Phenomenological Analysis of the EPR Argument.- 3. Causal and Deterministic Interpretations of Quantum Formausm.- Causal versus Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.- Perspectives of Physical Determinism.- Determinism, Separability, and Quantum Mechanics.- 4. Quantum Theory and Gravitation.- Can Singularities and Multidimensional Spaces Influence the Evolution of Quantum Mechanical Systems?.- Subquantum Mechanics and Graviton Blas.- 5. Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics.- Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. A Quantum Probabilistic Approach.- On the Adequacy of a Nonclassical Logic for Quantum Theory.- Remarks on the Hypothesis of Hidden Variables.- 6. Historical Developments of the Einstein-Bohr Controversy.- Historical Considerations on the Conceptual Experiment by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen.- Continuity and Discontinuity: The Einstein-Bohr Conflict of Ideas and the Bohr-Fock Discussion.- How Italian Philosophy Reacted to the Advent of Quantum Mechanics in the Thirties.- Italian Studies in the Foundations of Quantum Physics. A Bibliography (1965-1985).
The foundation of quantum mechanics in the early twentieth century marked a paradigm shift in our understanding of nature. In the historical trajectory, Erwin Schrödinger introduced the wave equation to describe micro-particles, but Max Born's subsequent probabilistic interpretation—defining the squared modulus of the wavefunction as a probability density—became the cornerstone of the Copenhagen interpretation, embedding intrinsic randomness into physical ontology. This paper investigates a counterfactual historical proposition: What if Schrödinger had firmly rejected the probabilistic interpretation at the outset and instead proposed that "the wavefunction is not a probability distribution, but the minimal mathematical encoding of physical reality"? We construct the ontological and mathematical-philosophical framework of "Compressed Reality Theory" (CRT), tracing how this alternative historical path would have accelerated the early development of quantum information, holographic principles, and quantum gravity. Under this paradigm, the central inquiry of physics shifts from "Where is the particle?" to "How much information is required to fully describe a reality?" By resolving the measurement paradox as a deterministic decompression mechanism rather than a subjective collapse, this thought experiment demonstrates how an information-centric ontology provides a unified, continuous, and deterministic picture bridging quantum phenomena and spacetime geometry.