Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Whiteheadian approach to quantum theory and the generalized Bell's theorem

Henry Pierce Stapp

Published Feb 1, 1979• 110 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00715049

Related papers

Quantum Processes: A Whiteheadian Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory

Henry Pierce Stapp

Process Studies•Apr 1, 2005•1 citation

Quantum Processes: A Whiteheadian Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory

Henry J. Folse

The Journal of Speculative Philosophy•Jan 1, 2005•2 citations

Whitehead’s Philosophy and Quantum Physics

S. Malin

Process Studies•Jan 1, 2002•2 citations

Hidden Variables and Incompatible Observables in Quantum Mechanics

Benjamin H. Feintzeig

This article takes up a suggestion that the reason we cannot find certain hidden variable theories for quantum mechanics, as in Bell’s theorem, is that we require them to assign joint probability distributions on incompatible observables. These joint distributions are problematic because they are empirically meaningless on one standard interpretation of quantum mechanics. Some have proposed getting around this problem by using generalized probability spaces. I present a theorem to show a sense in which generalized probability spaces can’t serve as hidden variable theories for quantum mechanics, so the proposal for getting around Bell’s theorem fails. 1 Introduction2 Bell’s Theorem and Classical Probability Spaces 2.1 Bell’s derivation of the Bell inequalities 2.2 Pitowsky’s derivation of the Bell inequalities3 Incompatible Observables4 Generalized Probability Spaces5 A ‘No-Go’ Theorem6 Conclusions

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Aug 31, 2014•5 citations

The Correlation of Quantum Mechanics and Whitehead’s Philosophy

Fordham University Press eBooks•Jan 29, 2019•0 citations

A Whiteheadian approach to Bell's correlations

S. Malin

Foundations of Physics•Oct 1, 1988•3 citations
This article takes up a suggestion that the reason we cannot find certain hidden variable theories for quantum mechanics, as in Bell’s theorem, is that we require them to assign joint probability distributions on incompatible observables. These joint distributions are problematic because they are empirically meaningless on one standard interpretation of quantum mechanics. Some have proposed getting around this problem by using generalized probability spaces. I present a theorem to show a sense in which generalized probability spaces can’t serve as hidden variable theories for quantum mechanics, so the proposal for getting around Bell’s theorem fails. 1 Introduction2 Bell’s Theorem and Classical Probability Spaces 2.1 Bell’s derivation of the Bell inequalities 2.2 Pitowsky’s derivation of the Bell inequalities3 Incompatible Observables4 Generalized Probability Spaces5 A ‘No-Go’ Theorem6 Conclusions