Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

On Uffink's criticism of protective measurements

Shan Gao

Published Aug 7, 2013• 15 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.07.001

Related papers

Reply to Gao's “On Uffink's criticism of protective measurements”

Jos Uffink

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Aug 20, 2013•9 citations

Protective Measurements

Yakir Aharonov, Lev Vaidman A

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics•Jan 1, 1995•6 citations

Reply to Gao’s ”Comment on ”How to protect the interpretation of the wave function against protective measurements”

Jos Uffink

Shan Gao (Gao 2011) recently presented a critical reconsideration of a paper I wote (Uffink 1999) on the subject of protective measurement. Here, I take the occasion to reply to his objections.

•Aug 24, 2012•2 citations

Protective Measurements

Lev Vaidman A

arXiv:0801.2761•Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•11 citations

On Uffink's alternative interpretation of protective measurements

Shan Gao

Protective measurement is a new measuring method introduced by Aharonov, Anandan and Vaidman (1993). By a protective measurement, one can measure the expectation value of an observable on a single quantum system, even if the system is initially not in an eigenstate of the measured observable. This remarkable feature of protective measurements was challenged by Uffink (1999, 2012). He argued that only observables that commute with the system's Hamiltonian can be protectively measured, and a protective measurement of an observable that does not commute with the system's Hamiltonian does not actually measure the observable, but measure another related observable that commutes with the system's Hamiltonian. In this paper, we show that there are several errors in Uffink's arguments, and his alternative interpretation of protective measurements is untenable.

•Nov 11, 2012•0 citations

A note on measurement

John Earman, Abner Shimony

Il Nuovo Cimento B•Apr 1, 1968•15 citations
Protective measurement is a new measuring method introduced by Aharonov, Anandan and Vaidman (1993). By a protective measurement, one can measure the expectation value of an observable on a single quantum system, even if the system is initially not in an eigenstate of the measured observable. This remarkable feature of protective measurements was challenged by Uffink (1999, 2012). He argued that only observables that commute with the system's Hamiltonian can be protectively measured, and a protective measurement of an observable that does not commute with the system's Hamiltonian does not actually measure the observable, but measure another related observable that commutes with the system's Hamiltonian. In this paper, we show that there are several errors in Uffink's arguments, and his alternative interpretation of protective measurements is untenable.