Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Phase-difference operator

Alfredo Luis, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

Published Dec 1, 1993• 150 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We introduce a unitary operator representing the exponential of the phase difference between two modes of the electromagnetic field. The eigenvalue spectrum has a discrete character that is fully analyzed. We relate this operator with a suitable polar decomposition of the Stokes parameters of the field, obtaining a natural classical limit. The cases of weakly and highly excited states are considered, discussing to what extent it is possible to talk about the phase for a single-mode field. This operator is applied to some interesting two-mode fields.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.48.4702

Related papers

Radiation phase of a dipole field

A.S. Shumovsky

In the case of a dipole electromagnetic radiation, the operator of the "radiation phase" is defined. It is shown that this operator has a discrete spectrum with eigenvalues, lying in the segment [0,2π]. Some properties of the radiation phase and polarization are discussed.

Acta Physica Slovaca Reviews and Tutorials•Jan 1, 1998•1 citation

Unitary Phase Operator in Quantum Mechanics

David Thomas Pegg, Stephen Mark Barnett

The difficulties in formulating a natural and simple operator description of the phase of a quantum oscillator or single-mode electromagnetic field have been known for some time. We present a unitary phase operator whose eigenstates are well-defined phase states and whose properties coincide with those normally associated with a phase. The corresponding phase eigenvalues form only a dense subset of the real numbers. A natural extension to the definition of a time-measurement operator yields a corresponding countable infinity of eigenvalues.

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Jul 15, 1988•605 citations

A way to define the phase distribution for a single-mode quantum field

Dragomir M Davidović, D I Lalovic

The idea that the phase of single-mode field may be correctly defined as a phase difference between the state considered and a highly excited coherent state treated as the reference phase state, although present in discussions about the quantum phase problem, have not been directly concretized and its consequences fully understood. In the present work we succeed in finding an effective mathematical procedure which corresponds exactly to this idea and so derive, using the results related to phase difference available in the literature, the phase distribution for a single-mode field. We discuss the obtained results.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jul 29, 1999•3 citations

The q-phase-difference operator and two-mode q-coherent states

Yaping Yang, Weiguo Feng, Xiang Xia Wu

In this paper, we introduce unitary and Hermitian phase-difference operators for the two modes of the electromagnetic field in the q-deformed case. The q-creation and annihilation operators of phase-difference quanta are given, and the algebraic properties of some operators in phase space are discussed. The phase-difference properties of two-mode q-coherent states are investigated.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 1997•3 citations

Quantum theory of optical phase correlations

Stephen Mark Barnett, David Thomas Pegg

We extend the theory of the Hermitian optical phase operator to analyze the quantum phase properties of pairs of electromagnetic field modes. The operators representing the sum and difference of the two single-mode phases are simply the sum and difference of the two single-mode phase operators. The eigenvalue spectra of the sum and difference operators have widths of 4\ensuremath{\pi}, but phases differing by 2\ensuremath{\pi} are physically indistinguishable. This means that the phase sum and difference probability distributions must be cast into a 2\ensuremath{\pi} range. We obtain mod(2\ensuremath{\pi}) probability distributions for the phase sum and difference that unambiguously reveal the signatures of randomness, phase correlations, and phase locking. We use our approach to investigate the phase sum and difference properties for uncorrelated modes in random and partial phase states and the phase-locked properties of the two-mode squeezed vacuum states. We reveal the fundamental property of two-mode squeezed states that the phase sum is locked to the argument of the squeezing parameter. The variance of the phase sum depends dilogarithmically on 1+tanhr, where r is the magnitude of the squeezing parameter, vanishing in the large squeezing limit.

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1990•90 citations

Relative phase for a quantum field interacting with a two-level system

Alfredo Luis, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

Several quantum descriptions of the relative phase between an atomic dipole and a one-mode electromagnetic field are examined. Positive-operator measures for this variable are derived from dipole and field-phase formalisms. They are analyzed and compared with an operator defined by a polar decomposition. Some examples of time evolution are discussed.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1997•19 citations
We introduce a unitary operator representing the exponential of the phase difference between two modes of the electromagnetic field. The eigenvalue spectrum has a discrete character that is fully analyzed. We relate this operator with a suitable polar decomposition of the Stokes parameters of the field, obtaining a natural classical limit. The cases of weakly and highly excited states are considered, discussing to what extent it is possible to talk about the phase for a single-mode field. This operator is applied to some interesting two-mode fields.
The difficulties in formulating a natural and simple operator description of the phase of a quantum oscillator or single-mode electromagnetic field have been known for some time. We present a unitary phase operator whose eigenstates are well-defined phase states and whose properties coincide with those normally associated with a phase. The corresponding phase eigenvalues form only a dense subset of the real numbers. A natural extension to the definition of a time-measurement operator yields a corresponding countable infinity of eigenvalues.
The idea that the phase of single-mode field may be correctly defined as a phase difference between the state considered and a highly excited coherent state treated as the reference phase state, although present in discussions about the quantum phase problem, have not been directly concretized and its consequences fully understood. In the present work we succeed in finding an effective mathematical procedure which corresponds exactly to this idea and so derive, using the results related to phase difference available in the literature, the phase distribution for a single-mode field. We discuss the obtained results.
We extend the theory of the Hermitian optical phase operator to analyze the quantum phase properties of pairs of electromagnetic field modes. The operators representing the sum and difference of the two single-mode phases are simply the sum and difference of the two single-mode phase operators. The eigenvalue spectra of the sum and difference operators have widths of 4\ensuremath{\pi}, but phases differing by 2\ensuremath{\pi} are physically indistinguishable. This means that the phase sum and difference probability distributions must be cast into a 2\ensuremath{\pi} range. We obtain mod(2\ensuremath{\pi}) probability distributions for the phase sum and difference that unambiguously reveal the signatures of randomness, phase correlations, and phase locking. We use our approach to investigate the phase sum and difference properties for uncorrelated modes in random and partial phase states and the phase-locked properties of the two-mode squeezed vacuum states. We reveal the fundamental property of two-mode squeezed states that the phase sum is locked to the argument of the squeezing parameter. The variance of the phase sum depends dilogarithmically on 1+tanhr, where r is the magnitude of the squeezing parameter, vanishing in the large squeezing limit.