Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Superoperators and their implications in the hybrid model for photodetection

Ching Tsung Lee

Published Jun 1, 1994• 17 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The external photodetection of cavity radiation is considered as a continuous quantum measurement in the sense of Srinivas and Davies [Opt. Acta 28, 981 (1981)]. It is analyzed in terms of three elementary processes: the no-leak process, the one-leak-undetected process, and the one-leak-detected process. The first two form a no-count process and the last one, a one-count process. Superoperators for these elementary processes are postulated, following the examples of Srinivas and Davies. The superoperators for the one-count process, the no-count process, the m-count process, and the nonreferring process are then derived based on the postulates. The following implications of these superoperators are found: (1) the change of average photon number due to the one-count process is identical to the well-known Q parameter introduced by Mandel [Opt. Lett. 4, 205 (1979)]; (2) the no-count process is governed by a pseudomaster equation; (3) The probability for the m-count process is the Poisson transform of the initial P function of the cavity radiation; and (4) the nonreferring measurement process is governed by a master equation.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.49.4888

Related papers

Pseudo-master-equation for the no-count process in a continuous photodetection

Ching Tsung Lee

The detection of cavity radiation with the detector placed outside the cavity is studied. Each leaked photon has a certain probability of propagating away without being detected. It is viewed as a continuous quantum measurement in which the density matrix is continuously revised according to the readout of the detector. By analyzing in terms of the more elementary no-leak and one-leak-undetected processes, the superoperator for the no-count process is derived, which leads to a pseudo-master-equation governing the time evolution of unnormalized photon-number distribution.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1994•9 citations

Continuous photodetection of resonance fluorescence

G. Nelson Jones, Ching Tsung Lee

The concept of photodetection as a continuous quantum measurement introduced by Srinivas and Davies is extended to the detection of resonance fluorescence. This is a new approach to an old subject. This is also a new development in continuous photodetection in the sense that a fermion rather than the traditional boson field is the subject of monitoring. The superoperators for the no-count and the one-count processes are postulated, following the examples of Srinivas and Davies. The probability for the m-count process is then derived on the basis of these postulates. The first two factorial moments of the photon-number distribution are calculated, which are then used to evaluate the non-classical effects in resonance fluorescence. A parameter slightly different from Mandel's is found to be more suitable indicator of photon antibunching in the transient state.

Journal of Modern Optics•Feb 1, 1998•2 citations

Cavity photon counting: ab-initio derivation of the quantum jump superoperators and comparison of the existing models

Teppo Häyrynen, Jani Oksanen, Jukka Tulkki

Time development of electromagnetic fields in closed cavities under continuous detection of photons continues to be a subject of confusing controversy. Recently Dodonov et al. [Phys. Rev. A, 75, 013806, 2007] argued that their model of quantum superoperators (E model) invalidates some of the predictions of the previously introduced photon counting model of Srinivas and Davies [J. Mod. Optic. 28, 981, 1981] (SD model). Both the SD and the E models are based on two postulated quantum jump superoperators: (1) the one-count operator corresponding to the absorption of a single photon and (2) the no-count operator. In this work we develop a stochastic difference equation that describes the dissipative coupling of the cavity field and the detector. The difference equation is based on non-perturbative treatment of the cavity-detector coupling. In spite of being non-integrable due to the coupling of the detector with an external reservoir it can be used to derive the exact forms of the quantum jump superoperators. When applied to a particular photon counting measurement our theory gives predictions identical with those of the SD model which should be considered a non-perturbative and ab-initio result. It is pointed out that available experimental results coincide with the results given by the ab-initio SD model. We summarize some of the key characteristics of cavity fields and photon counting processes to demonstrate that the results given by the SD model are consistent with the principles of quantum mechanics while those given by the E model are not.

arXiv:0808.1660•Aug 12, 2008•0 citations

Generalized Q parameters and their evolution under continuous photodetection

Ching Tsung Lee

The well known Q parameter introduced by Mandel (1958) is generalized to higher orders. The photodetection of a cavity radiation is considered as continuous quantum measurement which consists of one-count and no-count processes. The evolutions of the generalized Q parameters under both the one-count and the no-count processes are studied, emphasizing their relevance to the classical or non-classical characteristics of the radiation.

Quantum Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Feb 1, 1994•8 citations

A consistent quantum model for continuous photodetection processes

M. C. de Oliveira, Salomon Sylvain Mizrahi, V. V. Dodonov

We modify some aspects of the continuous photodetection theory proposed by Srinivas and Davies (SD) (1981 Opt. Acta 28 981), which describes the non-unitary evolution of a quantum field state subjected to a continuous photocount measurement. In order to remedy inconsistencies that appear in their approach, we redefine the ‘annihilation’ and ‘creation’ operators that enter in the photocount super-operators. We show that this new approach not only still satisfies all the requirements for a consistent photocount theory according to SD precepts, but also avoids some weird result appearing when previous definitions are used.

arXiv:quant-ph/0307089•Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Jun 1, 2003•23 citations

Quantum theory for continuous photodetection processes

Masahito Ueda, Nobuyuki Imoto, Tetsuo Ogawa

We develop a quantum theory for continuous photodetection processes that describes nonunitary time development of the field under continuous measurement of photon number. Exact expressions are obtained for time evolutions of the photon-field density operator, average and variance of the photon number, and the Fano factor. These are applied to typical quantum states, i.e., number, coherent, thermal, and squeezed states. The continuous photodetection process is made up of two elementary processes in terms of the referring measurement process, that is, one-count and no-count processes. Just after the one-count process in which a photodetector registers one photoelectron, the average photon number 〈n(t)〉 of the remaining field is shown to increase for super-Poissonian states (e.g., thermal state) and decrease for sub-Poissonian states (e.g., number state); for the Poissonian state (e.g., coherent light), 〈n(t)〉 does not change. During the no-count process in which the photodetector registers no photoelectrons, on the other hand, 〈n(t)〉 decreases in time for all states except the number state. The physical origins for these results are clarified from the viewpoint of nonunitary state reduction by continuous measurement of photon number. Furthermore, we introduce a nonreferring measurement process in which the detector registers photocounts, but we discard all readout information. We discuss the difference in the way the photon field evolves in this process compared to the referring measurement process.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1990•95 citations
The external photodetection of cavity radiation is considered as a continuous quantum measurement in the sense of Srinivas and Davies [Opt. Acta 28, 981 (1981)]. It is analyzed in terms of three elementary processes: the no-leak process, the one-leak-undetected process, and the one-leak-detected process. The first two form a no-count process and the last one, a one-count process. Superoperators for these elementary processes are postulated, following the examples of Srinivas and Davies. The superoperators for the one-count process, the no-count process, the m-count process, and the nonreferring process are then derived based on the postulates. The following implications of these superoperators are found: (1) the change of average photon number due to the one-count process is identical to the well-known Q parameter introduced by Mandel [Opt. Lett. 4, 205 (1979)]; (2) the no-count process is governed by a pseudomaster equation; (3) The probability for the m-count process is the Poisson transform of the initial P function of the cavity radiation; and (4) the nonreferring measurement process is governed by a master equation.
The detection of cavity radiation with the detector placed outside the cavity is studied. Each leaked photon has a certain probability of propagating away without being detected. It is viewed as a continuous quantum measurement in which the density matrix is continuously revised according to the readout of the detector. By analyzing in terms of the more elementary no-leak and one-leak-undetected processes, the superoperator for the no-count process is derived, which leads to a pseudo-master-equation governing the time evolution of unnormalized photon-number distribution.
The concept of photodetection as a continuous quantum measurement introduced by Srinivas and Davies is extended to the detection of resonance fluorescence. This is a new approach to an old subject. This is also a new development in continuous photodetection in the sense that a fermion rather than the traditional boson field is the subject of monitoring. The superoperators for the no-count and the one-count processes are postulated, following the examples of Srinivas and Davies. The probability for the m-count process is then derived on the basis of these postulates. The first two factorial moments of the photon-number distribution are calculated, which are then used to evaluate the non-classical effects in resonance fluorescence. A parameter slightly different from Mandel's is found to be more suitable indicator of photon antibunching in the transient state.
Time development of electromagnetic fields in closed cavities under continuous detection of photons continues to be a subject of confusing controversy. Recently Dodonov et al. [Phys. Rev. A, 75, 013806, 2007] argued that their model of quantum superoperators (E model) invalidates some of the predictions of the previously introduced photon counting model of Srinivas and Davies [J. Mod. Optic. 28, 981, 1981] (SD model). Both the SD and the E models are based on two postulated quantum jump superoperators: (1) the one-count operator corresponding to the absorption of a single photon and (2) the no-count operator. In this work we develop a stochastic difference equation that describes the dissipative coupling of the cavity field and the detector. The difference equation is based on non-perturbative treatment of the cavity-detector coupling. In spite of being non-integrable due to the coupling of the detector with an external reservoir it can be used to derive the exact forms of the quantum jump superoperators. When applied to a particular photon counting measurement our theory gives predictions identical with those of the SD model which should be considered a non-perturbative and ab-initio result. It is pointed out that available experimental results coincide with the results given by the ab-initio SD model. We summarize some of the key characteristics of cavity fields and photon counting processes to demonstrate that the results given by the SD model are consistent with the principles of quantum mechanics while those given by the E model are not.
We modify some aspects of the continuous photodetection theory proposed by Srinivas and Davies (SD) (1981 Opt. Acta 28 981), which describes the non-unitary evolution of a quantum field state subjected to a continuous photocount measurement. In order to remedy inconsistencies that appear in their approach, we redefine the ‘annihilation’ and ‘creation’ operators that enter in the photocount super-operators. We show that this new approach not only still satisfies all the requirements for a consistent photocount theory according to SD precepts, but also avoids some weird result appearing when previous definitions are used.
We develop a quantum theory for continuous photodetection processes that describes nonunitary time development of the field under continuous measurement of photon number. Exact expressions are obtained for time evolutions of the photon-field density operator, average and variance of the photon number, and the Fano factor. These are applied to typical quantum states, i.e., number, coherent, thermal, and squeezed states. The continuous photodetection process is made up of two elementary processes in terms of the referring measurement process, that is, one-count and no-count processes. Just after the one-count process in which a photodetector registers one photoelectron, the average photon number 〈n(t)〉 of the remaining field is shown to increase for super-Poissonian states (e.g., thermal state) and decrease for sub-Poissonian states (e.g., number state); for the Poissonian state (e.g., coherent light), 〈n(t)〉 does not change. During the no-count process in which the photodetector registers no photoelectrons, on the other hand, 〈n(t)〉 decreases in time for all states except the number state. The physical origins for these results are clarified from the viewpoint of nonunitary state reduction by continuous measurement of photon number. Furthermore, we introduce a nonreferring measurement process in which the detector registers photocounts, but we discard all readout information. We discuss the difference in the way the photon field evolves in this process compared to the referring measurement process.