Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Consciousness and Quantum Physics: Empirical Research on the Subjective Reduction of the Statevector

Dick J. Bierman, Stephen Whitmarsh

Published Sep 4, 2006• 16 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/3-540-36723-3_2

Related papers

Quantum theories of consciousness: a critical review of feasibility, philosophical sufficiency, and empirical testability

Xun Ma, Aoping Wang

Explaining subjective experience (the "hard problem") remains a central challenge in consciousness science. Research on "quantum consciousness" has grown rapidly in recent years, yet a substantial subset merely links terms such as collapse, superposition, and entanglement to qualia in verbal maneuvers that lack testable mechanistic commitments. This article adopts a theory-first critical-review framework and evaluates three classes of quantum theories of consciousness along three axes: (1) physical feasibility in warm, wet neural tissue strongly coupled to its environment; (2) philosophical sufficiency, i.e., a bridge from posited quantum processes to phenomenal character; and (3) empirical testability against classical alternatives. Based on the synthesized evidence, the present review suggests that further progress should prioritize experimentally tractable programs, in order to avoid the use of quantum terminology without mechanistic grounding in consciousness research and to convert debates into discriminating empirical programs.

Frontiers in Psychology•Apr 29, 2026•0 citations

Quantum-mechanical approach to the study of consciousness

В. Киричук, М. Филатов, С. В. Григорьева +2 more

Complexity Mind Postnonclassic•Apr 18, 2019•0 citations

Empirical Research on the Radical Subjective Solution of the Measurement Problem. Does Time get its Direction through Conscious Observation?

Dick J. Bierman

In a number of experimental studies we explored the so‐called ‘radical subjective’, and rather controversial, solution of the measurement problem. This solution posits that an interaction with a conscious entity is required to complete the measurement. Thus the collapse of the wave packet is assumed to be causally linked to a conscious observation. Under the assumption that the brain is sensitive for the difference between observing a quantum (superposition) state and a classical state this radical solution can be tested. A radioactive source was used to trigger beeps that first were delayed for 1 second and then were observed by a (final) observer from whom a continuous recording of brain activity was made. In about 50% of the events, another (pre) observer got feedback of this quantum event before the final observer. In those cases, presumably the pre‐observer’s observation resulted in collapse of the wave‐packet while in the other half of the cases the final observer was ‘producing’ the collapse. The brain signals of the final observer for the two types of events were compared. The ambiguous results of the studies will be discussed. If consciousness is the crucial ingredient for ‘collapse’ to occur, then this might also give a new anthropocentric hypothesis with regard to the ‘arrow of time’. The projection postulate implies a irreversible process of reduction and hence can be seen as one of the few non time‐symmetric processes in physics. If consciousness is required to have a collapse then it might follow that consciousness introduces time asymmetry into physics. New neuro‐cognitive models of consciousness suggest that the neural correlate of conscious experience (rather than non conscious processing) is the occurrence of massive parallel recurrent (i.e. non linear) neural activation. Thus the collapse of the wave packet would become associated with a strong non‐linear process. This fits, at least in a metaphorical sense, with the theoretical results where an introduction on a non linear term in the Schr̈odinger equation results in an ‘objective’ reduction of the wave packet.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2006•17 citations

Quantum Physics and the Nature of Consciousness

Surendra Sherchan

Nepal Journal of Health Sciences•Oct 25, 2024•0 citations

Consciousness and quantum mechanics

Max R. Bennett

Journal and proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales•Jun 1, 1996•1 citation

The Non-Institutional Observer in Theoretical Physics: Anomalous Phenomena as Empirical Starting Points for Quantum Gravity Research and the Case for Epistemological Pluralism

KUMI OOZAIKE

Theoretical physics stands at an impasse: the persistent incompatibility between quantum mechanics and general relativity suggests a need for a paradigm shift. This paper argues that the solution may lie outside institutional boundaries. We propose that the "non-institutional observer"—the independent researcher unconstrained by academic orthodoxy—is uniquely positioned to document and analyze anomalous phenomena that are often dismissed as "noise" by traditional science. Key themes explored in this paper: The Impasse of Quantum Gravity: Why current mathematical models of gravity fail to account for the observer’s subjective experience. Epistemological Pluralism: The necessity of integrating diverse perspectives, including lived observations of non-local events and consciousness-driven materialization, into the physical sciences. Historical Precedents: How "outsider" perspectives have historically triggered scientific revolutions (e.g., Einstein, Faraday). By validating anomalous experiences as legitimate empirical data, this paper calls for a new, inclusive framework for quantum gravity research that bridges the gap between objective measurement and subjective reality. Quantum Gravity, Theoretical Physics, Independent Researcher, Observer Problem, Anomalous Phenomena, Epistemology, Consciousness, Paradigm Shift, Non-Institutional Science

•Feb 26, 2026•0 citations
Explaining subjective experience (the "hard problem") remains a central challenge in consciousness science. Research on "quantum consciousness" has grown rapidly in recent years, yet a substantial subset merely links terms such as collapse, superposition, and entanglement to qualia in verbal maneuvers that lack testable mechanistic commitments. This article adopts a theory-first critical-review framework and evaluates three classes of quantum theories of consciousness along three axes: (1) physical feasibility in warm, wet neural tissue strongly coupled to its environment; (2) philosophical sufficiency, i.e., a bridge from posited quantum processes to phenomenal character; and (3) empirical testability against classical alternatives. Based on the synthesized evidence, the present review suggests that further progress should prioritize experimentally tractable programs, in order to avoid the use of quantum terminology without mechanistic grounding in consciousness research and to convert debates into discriminating empirical programs.
In a number of experimental studies we explored the so‐called ‘radical subjective’, and rather controversial, solution of the measurement problem. This solution posits that an interaction with a conscious entity is required to complete the measurement. Thus the collapse of the wave packet is assumed to be causally linked to a conscious observation. Under the assumption that the brain is sensitive for the difference between observing a quantum (superposition) state and a classical state this radical solution can be tested. A radioactive source was used to trigger beeps that first were delayed for 1 second and then were observed by a (final) observer from whom a continuous recording of brain activity was made. In about 50% of the events, another (pre) observer got feedback of this quantum event before the final observer. In those cases, presumably the pre‐observer’s observation resulted in collapse of the wave‐packet while in the other half of the cases the final observer was ‘producing’ the collapse. The brain signals of the final observer for the two types of events were compared. The ambiguous results of the studies will be discussed. If consciousness is the crucial ingredient for ‘collapse’ to occur, then this might also give a new anthropocentric hypothesis with regard to the ‘arrow of time’. The projection postulate implies a irreversible process of reduction and hence can be seen as one of the few non time‐symmetric processes in physics. If consciousness is required to have a collapse then it might follow that consciousness introduces time asymmetry into physics. New neuro‐cognitive models of consciousness suggest that the neural correlate of conscious experience (rather than non conscious processing) is the occurrence of massive parallel recurrent (i.e. non linear) neural activation. Thus the collapse of the wave packet would become associated with a strong non‐linear process. This fits, at least in a metaphorical sense, with the theoretical results where an introduction on a non linear term in the Schr̈odinger equation results in an ‘objective’ reduction of the wave packet.
Theoretical physics stands at an impasse: the persistent incompatibility between quantum mechanics and general relativity suggests a need for a paradigm shift. This paper argues that the solution may lie outside institutional boundaries. We propose that the "non-institutional observer"—the independent researcher unconstrained by academic orthodoxy—is uniquely positioned to document and analyze anomalous phenomena that are often dismissed as "noise" by traditional science. Key themes explored in this paper: The Impasse of Quantum Gravity: Why current mathematical models of gravity fail to account for the observer’s subjective experience. Epistemological Pluralism: The necessity of integrating diverse perspectives, including lived observations of non-local events and consciousness-driven materialization, into the physical sciences. Historical Precedents: How "outsider" perspectives have historically triggered scientific revolutions (e.g., Einstein, Faraday). By validating anomalous experiences as legitimate empirical data, this paper calls for a new, inclusive framework for quantum gravity research that bridges the gap between objective measurement and subjective reality. Quantum Gravity, Theoretical Physics, Independent Researcher, Observer Problem, Anomalous Phenomena, Epistemology, Consciousness, Paradigm Shift, Non-Institutional Science