Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Quantum mechanics in discrete space and angular momentum

Thalanayar S. Santhanam

Published Feb 1, 1977• 39 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00715246

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics on Discrete Space and Time

Miguel Lorente

arXiv:quant-ph/0401004•Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•13 citations

An odd feature of the “most classical” states of SU(2) invariant quantum mechanical systems

László B. Szabados

Complex and spinorial techniques of general relativity are used to determine all the states of SU(2) invariant quantum mechanical systems in which the equality holds in uncertainty relations for the components of the angular momentum vector operator in two given directions. The expectation values depend on a discrete quantum number and two parameters, one of them is the angle between two angular momentum components and the other is the quotient of two standard deviations. Allowing the angle between two angular momentum components to be arbitrary, a new genuine quantum mechanical phenomenon emerges: it is shown that although standard deviations change continuously, one of the expectation values changes discontinuously on this parameter space. Since physically neither of the angular momentum components is distinguished over the other, this discontinuity suggests that the genuine parameter space must be a double cover of this classical one: it must be diffeomorphic to a Riemann surface known in connection with the complex function z. Moreover, the angle between angular momentum components plays the role of the parameter of an interpolation between the continuous range of expectation values in the special case of orthogonal angular momentum components and the discrete point spectrum of one angular momentum component. The consequences in the simultaneous measurements of these angular momentum components are also discussed briefly.

arXiv:2106.08695•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 2023•2 citations

Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions—Angular Momentum

Charles E. Burkhardt, Jacob J. Leventhal

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Spherical angle operators for quantum-mechanical angular momentum

Gerard Nienhuis, S. J. van Enk

We discuss the operators for the spherical angles of a quantum-mechanical angular momentum vector. Since these operators are restricted to the 2 j + 1 dimensional state space, both the polar angle and the azimuthal angle have discrete eigenstates. These two operators do not commute, and thus they have a different eigenvector basis. Their commutation rule reflects the commutation rule for the Cartesian components of angular momentum. The relation with coherent spin states is analyzed.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1993•7 citations

A classical, elementary approach to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics

David Rodríguez

Elementary particles are found in two different situations: (i) bound to metastable states of matter, for which angular momentum is quantized, and (ii) free, for which, due to their high energy-momentum and leaving aside inner a.m. or spin, the $h$-quantization step is completely harmless. Perhaps Quantum Mechanics can be seen just as the simplest mathematical formalism where angular momentum (the magnitude of each of its three orthogonal projections) is by construction quantized: all possible values are taken from a discrete set. Indeed: (i) This idea finds support in very reasonable, completely classical physical arguments, if we place ourselves in the framework of Stochastic Electrodynamics (SED): there, all sustained periodic movement of a charge must satisfy a power balance that restricts the value of the average angular momentum, on each of its projections. (ii) It gives a natural explanation of the concept of "photon", as a constraint on the observable spectrum of energy-momentum exchanges between metastable physical states, in particular also for its discreteness. QM would be, in this picture, a semi-static theory, transparent to all the (micro)-dynamics taking place between apparently "discrete" events (transitions in the state of the system). For instance, (the magnitude of the projections of) quantum angular momentum would only reflect average values over a (classical) cyclic trajectory, a fact that we regard as almost obvious given the particularity of the corresponding addition rules in QM.

arXiv:1112.3369•Dec 13, 2011•0 citations

Quantum mechanics in a discrete space-time

Pavel Šťovíček, J. Tolar

Reports on Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 1984•91 citations
Complex and spinorial techniques of general relativity are used to determine all the states of SU(2) invariant quantum mechanical systems in which the equality holds in uncertainty relations for the components of the angular momentum vector operator in two given directions. The expectation values depend on a discrete quantum number and two parameters, one of them is the angle between two angular momentum components and the other is the quotient of two standard deviations. Allowing the angle between two angular momentum components to be arbitrary, a new genuine quantum mechanical phenomenon emerges: it is shown that although standard deviations change continuously, one of the expectation values changes discontinuously on this parameter space. Since physically neither of the angular momentum components is distinguished over the other, this discontinuity suggests that the genuine parameter space must be a double cover of this classical one: it must be diffeomorphic to a Riemann surface known in connection with the complex function z. Moreover, the angle between angular momentum components plays the role of the parameter of an interpolation between the continuous range of expectation values in the special case of orthogonal angular momentum components and the discrete point spectrum of one angular momentum component. The consequences in the simultaneous measurements of these angular momentum components are also discussed briefly.
Elementary particles are found in two different situations: (i) bound to metastable states of matter, for which angular momentum is quantized, and (ii) free, for which, due to their high energy-momentum and leaving aside inner a.m. or spin, the hhh-quantization step is completely harmless. Perhaps Quantum Mechanics can be seen just as the simplest mathematical formalism where angular momentum (the magnitude of each of its three orthogonal projections) is by construction quantized: all possible values are taken from a discrete set. Indeed: (i) This idea finds support in very reasonable, completely classical physical arguments, if we place ourselves in the framework of Stochastic Electrodynamics (SED): there, all sustained periodic movement of a charge must satisfy a power balance that restricts the value of the average angular momentum, on each of its projections. (ii) It gives a natural explanation of the concept of "photon", as a constraint on the observable spectrum of energy-momentum exchanges between metastable physical states, in particular also for its discreteness. QM would be, in this picture, a semi-static theory, transparent to all the (micro)-dynamics taking place between apparently "discrete" events (transitions in the state of the system). For instance, (the magnitude of the projections of) quantum angular momentum would only reflect average values over a (classical) cyclic trajectory, a fact that we regard as almost obvious given the particularity of the corresponding addition rules in QM.