Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Computers & Electrical Engineering

Fair exchange protocol of Schnorr signatures with semi-trusted adjudicator

Zuhua Shao

Published Apr 23, 2010• 14 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.compeleceng.2010.03.005

Related papers

Fair Exchange of Short Signatures without Trusted Third Party

Philippe Camacho

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2013•12 citations

Fair Exchange of Digital Signatures with Offline Trusted Third Party

Chuan-Kun Wu, Vijay Varadharajan

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2001•6 citations

Certificate-based Fair Exchange Protocol of Schnorr Signatures in Chosen-key Model

Zuhua Shao, Yipeng Gao

This paper proposes the first optimistic protocol to accomplish the fair exchange of standard Schnorr signatures in the chosen-key model, in which each participant is allowed to choose his Schnorr key pair freely without showing his knowledge of the private key. Besides solving the authentication problem of public keys, the protocol relaxes excessive trust on the adjudicator since the adjudicator needs to be trusted only by the signer. The protocol is secure against three types of inside adversaries under the DL assumption in the random oracle model. It suits much more the actual circumstances of the Internet.

Fundamenta Informaticae•Sep 14, 2015•2 citations

Fair exchange protocol of signatures based on aggregate signatures

Zuhua Shao

Computer Communications•Jan 2, 2008•21 citations

Generic construction of fair exchange scheme with semi-trusted adjudicator

Yang Wang, Willy Susilo, Joonsang Baek +2 more

2019, Innovative Information Science and Technology Research Group. All rights reserved. A fair exchange of digital signatures has been considered as a fundamental problem in cryptography. The most widely adopted approach to ensure the fairness of exchanging signatures is to resort to a trusted third party (TTP) whenever required. The TTP is assumed to be entirely honest and neutral, hence never colludes with the other parties in the system. In practice, such a TTP may not be available. To overcome this difficulty, Shao introduced a new idea of building fair exchange schemes with a semi-trusted adjudicator that only needs to be trusted by one party (the signer). These new fair exchange schemes are more practical than previous ones since there is no necessity for two mutually distrusted parties to commonly trust the same adjudicator. In the new approach, an adjudicator is also trusted unilaterally. Nevertheless, the two schemes that Shao proposed in 2008 and 2010, respectively, are both only provably secure in the random oracle model. In this paper, we revisited the schemes proposed by Shao and revealed that some subtle issues might have been overlooked. In particular, the number of interactions between the signer and the adjudicator is more involved than it is anticipated. Our investigation leads to a refined definition of this kind of fair exchange scheme with a semi-trusted adjudicator (FESTA). We proposed a generic construction in our model based on pseudo-random functions, collision-resistant hash functions and any digital signature schemes that are existentially unforgeable against adaptive chosen message attacks. Based on our generic construction, FESTA in the standard model can be realized. We provide such instantiations to demonstrate the practicability of our generic construction.

•Jan 1, 2019•2 citations

Secure group barter: Multi-party fair exchange with semi-trusted neutral parties

Matt Franklin, Gene Tsudik

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 1998•67 citations
This paper proposes the first optimistic protocol to accomplish the fair exchange of standard Schnorr signatures in the chosen-key model, in which each participant is allowed to choose his Schnorr key pair freely without showing his knowledge of the private key. Besides solving the authentication problem of public keys, the protocol relaxes excessive trust on the adjudicator since the adjudicator needs to be trusted only by the signer. The protocol is secure against three types of inside adversaries under the DL assumption in the random oracle model. It suits much more the actual circumstances of the Internet.
2019, Innovative Information Science and Technology Research Group. All rights reserved. A fair exchange of digital signatures has been considered as a fundamental problem in cryptography. The most widely adopted approach to ensure the fairness of exchanging signatures is to resort to a trusted third party (TTP) whenever required. The TTP is assumed to be entirely honest and neutral, hence never colludes with the other parties in the system. In practice, such a TTP may not be available. To overcome this difficulty, Shao introduced a new idea of building fair exchange schemes with a semi-trusted adjudicator that only needs to be trusted by one party (the signer). These new fair exchange schemes are more practical than previous ones since there is no necessity for two mutually distrusted parties to commonly trust the same adjudicator. In the new approach, an adjudicator is also trusted unilaterally. Nevertheless, the two schemes that Shao proposed in 2008 and 2010, respectively, are both only provably secure in the random oracle model. In this paper, we revisited the schemes proposed by Shao and revealed that some subtle issues might have been overlooked. In particular, the number of interactions between the signer and the adjudicator is more involved than it is anticipated. Our investigation leads to a refined definition of this kind of fair exchange scheme with a semi-trusted adjudicator (FESTA). We proposed a generic construction in our model based on pseudo-random functions, collision-resistant hash functions and any digital signature schemes that are existentially unforgeable against adaptive chosen message attacks. Based on our generic construction, FESTA in the standard model can be realized. We provide such instantiations to demonstrate the practicability of our generic construction.