Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer proceedings in physics

Thoughts on Using Variational Wavefunctions to Study Hubbard Models

S. N. Coppersmith, J. J. Sohn

Published Jan 1, 1993• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-84878-0_12

Related papers

Variational studies of the Hubbard model

Balázs Hetényi, Hans Gerd Evertz, Xiancong Lu

•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Stochastic wavefunction approach to Hubbard-like models

Olivier Juillet

•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Canonically transformed wavefunctions and operators for the ground state of the Hubbard model

Balázs Hetényi

•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

A Variational Moments Approach to the One Dimensional Hubbard Model

Zhi Hua Cheng, Yick Hong Chan, Jun Hui Liang +4 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2015•0 citations

Variational Many Body States for the U=∞ Hubbard Model

C. Stephen Hellberg, E. J. Melé

We study a general class of variational wavefunctions for strongly correlated lattice fermions. The wavefunctions considered here automatically satisfy local constraints of no double occupancy and include correlations between opposite spin particles in a very physical way. We calculate the energy and correlation functions for the one dimensional U=∞ Hubbard model, where a comparison with exact results is made. We briefly report on preliminary results for the t-J model.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•Jun 1, 1991•6 citations

Classical Benchmarks for Variational Quantum Eigensolver Simulations of the Hubbard Model

Antonios M. Alvertis, Abid Khan, Thomas Iadecola +2 more

Simulating the Hubbard model is of great interest to a wide range of applications within condensed matter physics, however its solution on classical computers remains challenging in dimensions larger than one. The relative simplicity of this model, embodied by the sparseness of the Hamiltonian matrix, allows for its efficient implementation on quantum computers, and for its approximate solution using variational algorithms such as the variational quantum eigensolver. While these algorithms have been shown to reproduce the qualitative features of the Hubbard model, their quantitative accuracy in terms of producing true ground state energies and other properties, and the dependence of this accuracy on the system size and interaction strength, the choice of variational ansatz, and the degree of spatial inhomogeneity in the model, remains unknown. Here we present a rigorous classical benchmarking study, demonstrating the potential impact of these factors on the accuracy of the variational solution of the Hubbard model on quantum hardware, for systems with up to 32 qubits. We find that even when using the most accurate wavefunction ansätze for the Hubbard model, the error in its ground state energy and wavefunction plateaus for larger lattices, while stronger electronic correlations magnify this issue. Concurrently, spatially inhomogeneous parameters and the presence of off-site Coulomb interactions only have a small effect on the accuracy of the computed ground state energies. Our study highlights the capabilities and limitations of current approaches for solving the Hubbard model on quantum hardware, and we discuss potential future avenues of research.

arXiv:2408.00836•Quantum•May 20, 2025•4 citations
Simulating the Hubbard model is of great interest to a wide range of applications within condensed matter physics, however its solution on classical computers remains challenging in dimensions larger than one. The relative simplicity of this model, embodied by the sparseness of the Hamiltonian matrix, allows for its efficient implementation on quantum computers, and for its approximate solution using variational algorithms such as the variational quantum eigensolver. While these algorithms have been shown to reproduce the qualitative features of the Hubbard model, their quantitative accuracy in terms of producing true ground state energies and other properties, and the dependence of this accuracy on the system size and interaction strength, the choice of variational ansatz, and the degree of spatial inhomogeneity in the model, remains unknown. Here we present a rigorous classical benchmarking study, demonstrating the potential impact of these factors on the accuracy of the variational solution of the Hubbard model on quantum hardware, for systems with up to 32 qubits. We find that even when using the most accurate wavefunction ansätze for the Hubbard model, the error in its ground state energy and wavefunction plateaus for larger lattices, while stronger electronic correlations magnify this issue. Concurrently, spatially inhomogeneous parameters and the presence of off-site Coulomb interactions only have a small effect on the accuracy of the computed ground state energies. Our study highlights the capabilities and limitations of current approaches for solving the Hubbard model on quantum hardware, and we discuss potential future avenues of research.