The electric Aharonov-Bohm effect is usually explained by means of the scalar potential, which is present in a multiply connected region of space time where no electric field acts on the charged particle. An alternative interpretation is given in terms of the particle's polarization field penetrating the region occupied by the electric field but inaccessible to the particle itself. Similarly, the magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect is usually explained by means of the vector potential, which is present in a multiply connected region of space where no magnetic-induction field acts on the charged particle. An alternative interpretation of this effect is given in terms of the particle's magnetization field penetrating the region occupied by the magnetic-induction field but inaccessible to the particle itself. Our interpretations of the electric and magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effects are both developed by using the multipolar form of the Lagrangian instead of the minimal-coupling form in the Feynman path integral.
The electric Aharonov-Bohm effect is usually explained by means of the scalar potential, which is present in a multiply connected region of space time where no electric field acts on the charged particle. An alternative interpretation is given in terms of the particle's polarization field penetrating the region occupied by the electric field but inaccessible to the particle itself. Similarly, the magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect is usually explained by means of the vector potential, which is present in a multiply connected region of space where no magnetic-induction field acts on the charged particle. An alternative interpretation of this effect is given in terms of the particle's magnetization field penetrating the region occupied by the magnetic-induction field but inaccessible to the particle itself. Our interpretations of the electric and magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effects are both developed by using the multipolar form of the Lagrangian instead of the minimal-coupling form in the Feynman path integral.
The seminal paper of Aharonov and Bohm [Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959)]10.1103/PhysRev.115.485 is at the origin of a very extensive literature in some of the more fundamental issues in physics. They claimed that electromagnetic fields can act at a distance on charged particles even if they are identically zero in the region of space where the particles propagate, that the fundamental electromagnetic quantities in quantum physics are not only the electromagnetic fields but also the circulations of the electromagnetic potentials; what gives them a real physical significance. They proposed two experiments to verify their theoretical conclusions. The magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect, where an electron is influenced by a magnetic field that is zero in the region of space accessible to the electron, and the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect where an electron is affected by a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in the region where the electron is propagating, i.e., such that the electric field vanishes along its trajectory. The Aharonov-Bohm effects imply such a strong departure from the physical intuition coming from classical physics that it is no wonder that they remain a highly controversial issue after more than fifty years, in spite of the fact that they are discussed in most of the text books in quantum mechanics. The magnetic case has been studied extensively. The experimental issues were settled by the remarkable experiments of Tonomura et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1443 (1982); Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 792 (1986)] with toroidal magnets, that gave a strong evidence of the existence of the effect, and by the recent experiment of Caprez et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 210401 (2007)]10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.210401 that shows that the results of the Tonomura et al. experiments cannot be explained by the action of a force. The theoretical issues were settled by Ballesteros and Weder [Commun. Math. Phys. 285, 345 (2009)10.1007/s00220-008-0579-1; J. Math. Phys. 50, 122108 (2009)10.1063/1.3266176; Commun. Math. Phys. 303, 175 (2011)]10.1007/s00220-010-1166-9 who rigorously proved that quantum mechanics predicts the experimental results of Tonomura et al. and of Caprez et al. The electric Aharonov-Bohm effect has been much less studied. Actually, its existence, that has not been confirmed experimentally, is a very controversial issue. In their 1959 paper Aharonov and Bohm proposed an ansatz for the solution to the Schrödinger equation in regions where there is a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in space. It consists in multiplying the free evolution by a phase given by the integral in time of the potential. The validity of this ansatz predicts interference fringes between parts of a coherent electron beam that are subjected to different potentials. In this paper we prove that the exact solution to the Schrödinger equation is given by the Aharonov-Bohm ansatz up to an error bound in norm that is uniform in time and that decays as a constant divided by the velocity. Our results give, for the first time, a rigorous proof that quantum mechanics predicts the existence of the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect, under conditions that we provide. We hope that our results will stimulate the experimental research on the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect.
The magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect shows that charged particles may be affected by the vector potential in regions without any electric or magnetic fields [1]. The Aharonov-Bohm effect was experimentally confirmed [2-3] and has been found in many situations [4-6]. A common explanation is based on quantum mechanics, which states that the wavefunctions associated with the charges will accumulate a phase shift due to the vector potential. However, consensus about its nature and interpretation has not been achieved [7-14]. We here propose a simple but reasonable interpretation based on the theory for electromagnetic radiation and couplings [15]. The energy associated with a pulse radiator is divided into a Coulomb-velocity energy and a radiative energy, together with a macroscopic Schott energy accounting for the energy exchange between them. All these energies are expressed with terms including the potentials, so are the mutual coupling energies. There exists a force acting on the moving charges even though the fields completely vanish. This force makes the charges pass through the magnetic solenoid in different velocity with different path length, causing a phase shift the same as that obtained with quantum mechanics. The theory is originally aimed for providing an interpretation for electromagnetic radiation and mutual coupling. It is derived directly from the Maxwell theory with no modification but only substitution and reorganization.
It is shown that electromagnetic effects of a vector potential on a charged particle confined to a region R (multiply or simply connected) are completely determined by field strengths in R, if the potential obeys certain conditions. Such potentials are adequate in experiments purporting to show Aharonov-Bohm effect. Therefore these experiments have not established effects of inaccessible fields.
This work presents an analysis of the Aharonov-Bohm effect taking into account both regions where the electron is present and where it is excluded, and also the time variations of the magnetic vector potential and the magnetic induction field as they change between two of their stationary values. This analysis allows the identification of the electrical force field induced in the region where the electron is present by the time variation of the magnetic flux in the region where the electron is excluded, thus providing a classical explanation of the changes in the stationary properties of the electron when the magnetic potential and field change from one set of stationary values to another. Some apparent contradictions in attempts to interpret the A-B effect are also discussed and clarified.
The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect is a pure quantum effect that implies a measurable phase shift in the wave function for a charged particle that encircles a magnetic flux located in a region inaccessible to the particle. Classically, such a nonlocal effect appears to be impossible since the Lorentz force depends on only the magnetic field at the location of the particle. In quantum mechanics, the Hamiltonian, and thus the Schr\"odinger equation, has a local coupling between the current due to the particle and the electromagnetic vector potential A, which extends to the entire space beyond the region with finite magnetic field. This has sometimes been interpreted as meaning that in quantum mechanics A is in some sense more ``fundamental'' than B in spite of the former being gauge dependent and thus unobservable. Here we shall, with a general proof followed by a few examples, demonstrate that the AB effect can be fully accounted for by considering only the gauge-invariant B field, as long as it is included as part of the quantum action of the entire isolated system. The price for the gauge-invariant formulation is that we must give up locality---the AB phase for the particle will arise from the change in the action for the B field in the region inaccessible to the particle.
The most popular interpretation of the Aharonov–Bohm (AB) effect is that the electromagnetic potential locally affects the complex phase of a charged particle’s wave function in the magnetic field free region. However, since the vector potential is a gauge-variant quantity, multiple researchers suspect that it is just a convenient tool for calculating the force field. This motivates them to explain the AB effect without using the vector potential, which inevitably leads to some sort of non-locality. This frustrating situation is shortly summarized by the statement by Aharonov et al. that the AB effect may be due to a local gauge potential or due to non-local gauge-invariant fields. In the present paper, we shall give several convincing arguments which support the viewpoint that the vector potential is not just a convenient mathematical tool with little physical entity. Despite its gauge arbitrariness, the vector potential certainly contains a gauge-invariant piece, which solely explains the observed AB phase shift. Importantly, this component has a property such that it is basically unique and cannot be eliminated by any regular gauge transformations. To complete the discussion, we also discuss the role of remaining gauge arbitrariness still contained in the entire vector potential.