Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica C Superconductivity

Effect of correlated hopping on the superconductivity of the one-dimensional t-J model

F. Lema, C. D. Batista, Armando A. Aligia

Published Mar 1, 1996• 8 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0921-4534(96)00117-7

Related papers

Superconducting correlations in the two-dimensional Hubbard model with long-range electron hopping

Pavol Farkašovský

Physica C Superconductivity•Sep 5, 2022•4 citations

Ground-state phase diagram of the one-dimensional t−J model with pair hopping terms

Jonathan R. Coulthard, Stephen R. L. Clark, Dieter Jaksch

The $t\ensuremath{-}J$ model is a standard model of strongly correlated electrons, often studied in the context of high-${T}_{c}$ superconductivity. However, most studies of this model neglect three-site terms, which appear at the same order as the superexchange $J$. As these terms correspond to pair hopping, they are expected to play an important role in the physics of superconductivity when doped sufficiently far from half filling. We present a density matrix renormalization-group study of the one-dimensional $t\ensuremath{-}J$ model with the pair hopping terms included. We demonstrate that these additional terms radically change the one-dimensional ground-state phase diagram, extending the superconducting region at low fillings, while at larger fillings, superconductivity is completely suppressed. We explain this effect by introducing a simplified effective model of repulsive hardcore bosons.

arXiv:1804.09197•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jul 13, 2018•16 citations

Superconductivity in the Two-Dimensional t-J Model.

幸則 太田, R. Eder, 禎通 前川

日本物理學會誌•Jan 1, 1995•3 citations

Superconducting correlation in the one-dimensional t-J model with broken parity

Jun’ichi Shiraishi, Yoshifumi Morita, Mahito Kohmoto

APS•Mar 1, 1996•0 citations

D-Wave Pairing of the Two-Dimensional Extended t-J Model

C. T. Shih, Y. C. Chen, Taehyun Lee

In this paper, the effect of the next-earest (t ′ ) and third-earest (t ′ ′ ) hopping terms on superconductivity (SC) of the two-dimensional (2D) extended t-J model is studied by the variational Monte-Carlo (VMC) method. For hole-doped systems, the d-wave pairing correlation is suppressed by t ′ and t ′ ′ for underdoped cases, while it can be greatly enhanced by proper values of t ′ and t ′ ′ for the overdoped ones. This behavior results from the deformation of the Fermi surfaces. PACS numbers: 74.20.-z, 71.18.+y The 2D t-J model is one of the most popular models for studying the properties of the high-temperature superconductivity (HTS) [1, 2]. Yet the problem whether this model can give such high Tc for the cuprates or not is still under debate [4–7]. It has been well accepted that the next-nearest-neighbor (t ′ ) and the third-nearest-neighbor (t ′ ′) hopping terms are necessary for models to explain several experiments like angle-resolved photoemission (ARPES) of HTS [3]. However, the effect of t ′ and t ′ ′ on pairing correlation is also controversial. Previous DMRG studies of the two-dimensional (2D) extended t-J model show that the SC is suppressed (enhanced) for negative (positive) next-nearestneighbor hopping t ′ /t [8]. But results from first-principle calculation show that t ′ /t = −0.3 maximizes SC at optimal doping [9]. The Hamiltonian of the extended t-J model is H = Ht + HJ = − ∑ ij tij(˜c † i,σ ˜cj,σ + H.C.) + J ∑

Chinese Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 2005•0 citations

Excitations and superconductivity in the two-dimensional t-J model

Y. Ohta, Tomohiro Shimozato, R. Eder +1 more

Physica C Superconductivity•Dec 1, 1994•0 citations
The $t\ensuremath{-}J$ model is a standard model of strongly correlated electrons, often studied in the context of high-Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ superconductivity. However, most studies of this model neglect three-site terms, which appear at the same order as the superexchange JJJ. As these terms correspond to pair hopping, they are expected to play an important role in the physics of superconductivity when doped sufficiently far from half filling. We present a density matrix renormalization-group study of the one-dimensional $t\ensuremath{-}J$ model with the pair hopping terms included. We demonstrate that these additional terms radically change the one-dimensional ground-state phase diagram, extending the superconducting region at low fillings, while at larger fillings, superconductivity is completely suppressed. We explain this effect by introducing a simplified effective model of repulsive hardcore bosons.
In this paper, the effect of the next-earest (t ′ ) and third-earest (t ′ ′ ) hopping terms on superconductivity (SC) of the two-dimensional (2D) extended t-J model is studied by the variational Monte-Carlo (VMC) method. For hole-doped systems, the d-wave pairing correlation is suppressed by t ′ and t ′ ′ for underdoped cases, while it can be greatly enhanced by proper values of t ′ and t ′ ′ for the overdoped ones. This behavior results from the deformation of the Fermi surfaces. PACS numbers: 74.20.-z, 71.18.+y The 2D t-J model is one of the most popular models for studying the properties of the high-temperature superconductivity (HTS) [1, 2]. Yet the problem whether this model can give such high Tc for the cuprates or not is still under debate [4–7]. It has been well accepted that the next-nearest-neighbor (t ′ ) and the third-nearest-neighbor (t ′ ′) hopping terms are necessary for models to explain several experiments like angle-resolved photoemission (ARPES) of HTS [3]. However, the effect of t ′ and t ′ ′ on pairing correlation is also controversial. Previous DMRG studies of the two-dimensional (2D) extended t-J model show that the SC is suppressed (enhanced) for negative (positive) next-nearestneighbor hopping t ′ /t [8]. But results from first-principle calculation show that t ′ /t = −0.3 maximizes SC at optimal doping [9]. The Hamiltonian of the extended t-J model is H = Ht + HJ = − ∑ ij tij(˜c † i,σ ˜cj,σ + H.C.) + J ∑