Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Russian Physics Journal

Unitary operator generating the Bogolyubov canonical transformation

É. A. Arinshtein

Published May 1, 2006• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s11182-006-0143-4

Related papers

The unitary operator form of the general Bogolyubov-Tyablikov transformation

W. J. Ziętek

Physics Letters A•Jul 1, 1972•2 citations

Bogolyubov transformation in terms of creation and annihilation operators

O. D. Timofeevskaya

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 1983•2 citations

Bogolyubov canonical transformation and collective states of bosonic fields

A. S. Shumovskiǐ

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 1991•5 citations

Mapping of a classical transformation in Grassmann number space to a Fermi unitary operator

Fan Hong‐Yi

The formalism of mapping a classical canonical transformation to quantum unitary operators for a boson system is generalized to fermion systems. In terms of the ``integration within an ordered product'' technique for fermion systems, the transition of a classical transformation in Grassmann number space to a quantum image is manifestly evaluated in the fermion coherent-state representation. The normally ordered unitary operators that generate the Bogolyubov-Valatin transformation and the SU(2) rotation are derived in this way.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1989•19 citations

Quantization in terms of Bogolyubov Group Variables

Oleg Antonovich Khrustalev, S. Yu. Vernov, Маргарита Владимировна Чичикина

The purpose of the present paper is to consider the problem of quantization close to a nontrivial classical field. It is well-known that careless introduction of the classical fields leads to violation of the conservation laws and to the zero-mode problem, which reflects incompatibility between the adopted perturbation theory and the symmetry properties of the system. Bogolyubov group variables are some operators, which can be treated as parameters of the system symmetry group. For example, let’s consider a system with translational symmetry. After Bogolyubov transformation a static classical solution σ(x) transforms in σ(x− â), where â is an operator, canonical conjugate to an operator of the total linear momentum. Group variables are cyclic due to Hamiltonian symmetry, so the conservation laws are accomplished. For a system with adiabatic coupling the problem of combining of the conservation laws with perturbation theory has been solved by N.N. Bogolyubov in 1950, when he studied the polaron problem [1]. The further investigations have shown that Bogolyubov group variables have a wide range of application. These variables have been used in the strong coupling theory [2–8], the relativistic theory of gravitation [9] and other fields of the theoretical physics [10–22]. The Bogolyubov method has been independently rediscovered in the middle of 1970s and named collective coordinate method [23–26]. Connection between various variants of this method has been discussed in [10]. It was revealed however that consideration of systems with a nonstationary classical components is a rather nontrivial problem, because explicit Hamiltonian structure as the time-translation generator becomes clear only after solving the motion equations. So we have to construct such Bogolyubov’s scheme that group variables are defined in

•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

The unitary representation operators

G. Alagar Ramanujam

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Apr 1, 1975•0 citations
The formalism of mapping a classical canonical transformation to quantum unitary operators for a boson system is generalized to fermion systems. In terms of the ``integration within an ordered product'' technique for fermion systems, the transition of a classical transformation in Grassmann number space to a quantum image is manifestly evaluated in the fermion coherent-state representation. The normally ordered unitary operators that generate the Bogolyubov-Valatin transformation and the SU(2) rotation are derived in this way.
The purpose of the present paper is to consider the problem of quantization close to a nontrivial classical field. It is well-known that careless introduction of the classical fields leads to violation of the conservation laws and to the zero-mode problem, which reflects incompatibility between the adopted perturbation theory and the symmetry properties of the system. Bogolyubov group variables are some operators, which can be treated as parameters of the system symmetry group. For example, let’s consider a system with translational symmetry. After Bogolyubov transformation a static classical solution σ(x) transforms in σ(x− â), where â is an operator, canonical conjugate to an operator of the total linear momentum. Group variables are cyclic due to Hamiltonian symmetry, so the conservation laws are accomplished. For a system with adiabatic coupling the problem of combining of the conservation laws with perturbation theory has been solved by N.N. Bogolyubov in 1950, when he studied the polaron problem [1]. The further investigations have shown that Bogolyubov group variables have a wide range of application. These variables have been used in the strong coupling theory [2–8], the relativistic theory of gravitation [9] and other fields of the theoretical physics [10–22]. The Bogolyubov method has been independently rediscovered in the middle of 1970s and named collective coordinate method [23–26]. Connection between various variants of this method has been discussed in [10]. It was revealed however that consideration of systems with a nonstationary classical components is a rather nontrivial problem, because explicit Hamiltonian structure as the time-translation generator becomes clear only after solving the motion equations. So we have to construct such Bogolyubov’s scheme that group variables are defined in