Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE

Partial entanglement, complementary, and simultaneous measurement of discrete observables

Alexei S. Trifonov, Jonas Söderholm, Gunnar G. Bjork

Published Apr 3, 2002• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Different quantum information schemes, such as eavesdropping in quantum cryptography, dictate the necessity of extracting information about pair conjugate observables from a single copy of a quantum system. Mathematically, quantum measurements are usually described by an uncertainty relation. The difference between the simultaneous measurement uncertainty relation form those known from the textbooks on quantum mechanics is the additional uncertainty associated with the measurement procedure itself in contrast to the state preparation uncertainties described by the Schroedinger-Robertson type uncertainty relations. We present here an overview of our approach based on the state estimation theory and maximum likelihood strategy. We make a theoretical analysis and an experimental verification of minimum-uncertainty product of the two-states quantum system simultaneous measurement based on partially entangled photon pairs.

DOI
10.1117/12.464480

Related papers

Simultaneous Minimum-Uncertainty Measurement of Discrete-Valued Complementary Observables

Alexei S. Trifonov, Gunnar G. Bjork, Jonas Söderholm

We have made the first experimental demonstration of the simultaneous minimum uncertainty product between two complementary observables for a two-state system (a qubit). A partially entangled two-photon state, where each of the photons carries (partial) information of the initial state, was used to perform such a measurement.

arXiv:quant-ph/0012124•Physical Review Letters•May 14, 2001•27 citations

Joint Measurements of Complementary Properties of Quantum Systems

Guillaume Thekkadath

In quantum mechanics, measurements disturb the state of the system being measured. This disturbance is largest for complementary properties (e.g. position and momentum) and hence limits the precision with which such properties can be determined simultaneously. Often, this fact is conflated with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which refers to an uncertainty relation between complementary properties that is intrinsic to quantum states. In this thesis, the distinction between these two fundamental characteristics of quantum mechanics is made clear. At the intersection of the two are "joint measurements", which circumvent measurement disturbance to simultaneously determine complementary properties. They have applications in quantum metrology and enable a direct measurement of quantum states. The focus of this thesis is on the latter. The thesis is structured in the following way. The first chapter serves as an introduction to joint measurements. It surveys the seminal works in the field, doing so in a chronological manner to provide some historical context. The remainder of the thesis discusses two strategies to experimentally achieve joint measurements. The first strategy is to sequentially measure the complementary properties, making these measurements weak so that they do not disrupt each other. The second strategy is to first clone the system being measured, and then measure each complementary property on a separate clone. Both strategies are experimentally demonstrated on polarized photons, but can be readily extended to other systems.

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Entropic uncertainty relations – A survey

Stephanie Wehner, Andreas Winter

Uncertainty relations play a central role in quantum mechanics. Entropic uncertainty relations in particular have gained significant importance within quantum information, providing the foundation for the security of many quantum cryptographic protocols. Yet, rather little is known about entropic uncertainty relations with more than two measurement settings. In this note we review known results and open questions. The uncertainty principle is one of the fundamental ideas of quantum mechanics. Since Heisenberg’s uncertainty relations for canonically conjugate variables, they have been one of the most prominent examples of how quantum mechanics differs from the classical world (Heisenberg, 1927). Uncertainty relations today are probably best known in the form given by (Robertson, 1929), who extended Heisenberg’s result to two arbitrary observables A and B. Robertson’s relation states that if we prepare many copies of the state |ψ〉, and measure each copy individually using either A or B, we have

•Jan 1, 2009•239 citations

Minimum uncertainty states in the presence of quantum memory

Huangjun Zhu

The uncertainty principle imposes a fundamental limit on predicting the measurement outcomes of incompatible observables even if complete classical information of the system state is known. The situation is different if one can build a quantum memory entangled with the system. Minimum uncertainty states are peculiar quantum states that can eliminate uncertainties of incompatible von Neumann observables once assisted by suitable measurements on the memory. Here we determine all minimum uncertainty states of any given set of observables and determine the minimum entanglement required. It turns out all minimum uncertainty states are maximally entangled in a generic case, and vice versa, even if these observables are only weakly incompatible. Our work establishes a precise connection between minimum uncertainty and maximum entanglement, which is of interest to foundational studies and practical applications, including quantum certification and verification.

•Mar 4, 2020•1 citation

Quantum complementarity from a measurement-based perspective

Shan Huang, Wen‐Bo Liu, Yundu Zhao +3 more

One of the most remarkable features of quantum physics is that attributes of quantum objects, such as the wavelike and particlelike behaviors of single photons, can be complementary in the sense that they are equally real but cannot be observed simultaneously. Quantum measurements, serving as windows providing views into the abstract edifice of quantum theory, are basic tools for manifesting the intrinsic behaviors of quantum objects. However, a quantitative formulation of complementarity that highlights its manifestations in general measurement scenarios remains elusive. Here we develop a general framework for demonstrating quantum complementarity in the form of information exclusion relations (IERs), which incorporates the wave-particle duality relations as particular examples. Moreover, we explore the applications of our theory in entanglement detection and elucidate that our IERs lead to an extended form of entropic uncertainty relations, providing insights into the connection between quantum complementarity and the preparation uncertainty.

arXiv:2210.00958•Physical Review A•Feb 26, 2024•2 citations

Complementary observables and uncertainty relations

K. Kraus

Two observables A and B of an n-level system (i.e., a quantum system with n-dimensional state space) are called complementary, if knowledge of the measured value of A implies maximal uncertainty of the measured value of B, and vice versa. Such observables exist for all n, but no classification (up to equivalence) of all possible pairs of complementary observables is known except for n\ensuremath{\le}4. Complementary observables are conjectured to satisfy an ``entropic'' uncertainty relation of the strongest possible form. This relation has been verified for n\ensuremath{\le}4 by explicit calculations. A recent attempt of substantiating the widespread interpretation of uncertainty relations in terms of mutual disturbances between measurements is criticized.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•May 15, 1987•558 citations
Different quantum information schemes, such as eavesdropping in quantum cryptography, dictate the necessity of extracting information about pair conjugate observables from a single copy of a quantum system. Mathematically, quantum measurements are usually described by an uncertainty relation. The difference between the simultaneous measurement uncertainty relation form those known from the textbooks on quantum mechanics is the additional uncertainty associated with the measurement procedure itself in contrast to the state preparation uncertainties described by the Schroedinger-Robertson type uncertainty relations. We present here an overview of our approach based on the state estimation theory and maximum likelihood strategy. We make a theoretical analysis and an experimental verification of minimum-uncertainty product of the two-states quantum system simultaneous measurement based on partially entangled photon pairs.
In quantum mechanics, measurements disturb the state of the system being measured. This disturbance is largest for complementary properties (e.g. position and momentum) and hence limits the precision with which such properties can be determined simultaneously. Often, this fact is conflated with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which refers to an uncertainty relation between complementary properties that is intrinsic to quantum states. In this thesis, the distinction between these two fundamental characteristics of quantum mechanics is made clear. At the intersection of the two are "joint measurements", which circumvent measurement disturbance to simultaneously determine complementary properties. They have applications in quantum metrology and enable a direct measurement of quantum states. The focus of this thesis is on the latter. The thesis is structured in the following way. The first chapter serves as an introduction to joint measurements. It surveys the seminal works in the field, doing so in a chronological manner to provide some historical context. The remainder of the thesis discusses two strategies to experimentally achieve joint measurements. The first strategy is to sequentially measure the complementary properties, making these measurements weak so that they do not disrupt each other. The second strategy is to first clone the system being measured, and then measure each complementary property on a separate clone. Both strategies are experimentally demonstrated on polarized photons, but can be readily extended to other systems.
Uncertainty relations play a central role in quantum mechanics. Entropic uncertainty relations in particular have gained significant importance within quantum information, providing the foundation for the security of many quantum cryptographic protocols. Yet, rather little is known about entropic uncertainty relations with more than two measurement settings. In this note we review known results and open questions. The uncertainty principle is one of the fundamental ideas of quantum mechanics. Since Heisenberg’s uncertainty relations for canonically conjugate variables, they have been one of the most prominent examples of how quantum mechanics differs from the classical world (Heisenberg, 1927). Uncertainty relations today are probably best known in the form given by (Robertson, 1929), who extended Heisenberg’s result to two arbitrary observables A and B. Robertson’s relation states that if we prepare many copies of the state |ψ〉, and measure each copy individually using either A or B, we have
The uncertainty principle imposes a fundamental limit on predicting the measurement outcomes of incompatible observables even if complete classical information of the system state is known. The situation is different if one can build a quantum memory entangled with the system. Minimum uncertainty states are peculiar quantum states that can eliminate uncertainties of incompatible von Neumann observables once assisted by suitable measurements on the memory. Here we determine all minimum uncertainty states of any given set of observables and determine the minimum entanglement required. It turns out all minimum uncertainty states are maximally entangled in a generic case, and vice versa, even if these observables are only weakly incompatible. Our work establishes a precise connection between minimum uncertainty and maximum entanglement, which is of interest to foundational studies and practical applications, including quantum certification and verification.
One of the most remarkable features of quantum physics is that attributes of quantum objects, such as the wavelike and particlelike behaviors of single photons, can be complementary in the sense that they are equally real but cannot be observed simultaneously. Quantum measurements, serving as windows providing views into the abstract edifice of quantum theory, are basic tools for manifesting the intrinsic behaviors of quantum objects. However, a quantitative formulation of complementarity that highlights its manifestations in general measurement scenarios remains elusive. Here we develop a general framework for demonstrating quantum complementarity in the form of information exclusion relations (IERs), which incorporates the wave-particle duality relations as particular examples. Moreover, we explore the applications of our theory in entanglement detection and elucidate that our IERs lead to an extended form of entropic uncertainty relations, providing insights into the connection between quantum complementarity and the preparation uncertainty.
Two observables A and B of an n-level system (i.e., a quantum system with n-dimensional state space) are called complementary, if knowledge of the measured value of A implies maximal uncertainty of the measured value of B, and vice versa. Such observables exist for all n, but no classification (up to equivalence) of all possible pairs of complementary observables is known except for n\ensuremath{\le}4. Complementary observables are conjectured to satisfy an ``entropic'' uncertainty relation of the strongest possible form. This relation has been verified for n\ensuremath{\le}4 by explicit calculations. A recent attempt of substantiating the widespread interpretation of uncertainty relations in terms of mutual disturbances between measurements is criticized.