Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Time-evolution of highly localized positive-energy states of the free Dirac electron

Anthony J. Bracken, J.A Flohr, G.F. Melloy

Published Sep 15, 2005• 11 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Highly localized positive-energy states of the free Dirac electron are constructed and shown to evolve in a simple way under the action of Dirac's equation. When the initial uncertainty in position is small on the scale of the Compton wavelength, there is an associated uncertainty in the mean energy that is large compared with the rest mass of the electron. However, this does not lead to any breakdown of the one-particle description, associated with the possibility of pair-production, but rather leads to a rapid expansion of the probability density outwards from the point of localization, at speeds close to the speed of light.

DOI
10.1098/rspa.2005.1538

Related papers

Free-Dirac-particle evolution as a quantum random walk

Anthony J. Bracken, Demosthenes Ellinas, Ioannis Smyrnakis

It is known that any positive-energy state of a free Dirac particle that is initially highly localized evolves in time by spreading at speeds close to the speed of light. As recently indicated by Strauch, this general phenomenon, and the resulting ``two-horned'' distributions of position probability along any axis through the point of initial localization, can be interpreted in terms of a quantum random walk, in which the roles of ``coin'' and ``walker'' are naturally associated with the spin and translational degrees of freedom in a discretized version of Dirac's equation. We investigate the relationship between these two evolutions analytically and show how the evolved probability density on the $x$ axis for the Dirac particle at any time $t$ can be obtained from the asymptotic form of the probability distribution for the position of a ``quantum walker.'' The case of a highly localized initial state is discussed as an example.

arXiv:quant-ph/0605195•Physical Review A•Feb 21, 2007•60 citations

Aspects of particle localisation in quantum mechanics

G.F. Melloy

The concept of position is a basic one in our construction of a model of thenphysical world: yet the theory of localisation in quantum mechanics is fraughtnwith difficulties, especially in the relativistic case. A strictly localised state forna nonrelativistic particle cannot be described by an ordinary function. In thenrelativistic case the problems are manifold. For a free electron, using the Diracnposition operator x, we cannot construct positive-energy states which localisenthe particle within a compact region. Furthermore it has been suggested that anconsistent one-particle description of localisation on a scale small compared tonthe Compton wavelength of the particle is ruled out because pair-productionnwould take place. These matters are dicussed at greater length in Chaptern1, where several proposed localisation schemes (that is, sets of definitions ofnlocalised states and position operators) are reviewed: none of these is deemednwholly satisfactory. Introductory remarks are also made in this chapter aboutnthe remarkable phenomenon of 'probability backflow', which is discussed further below, and which is relevant to our discussion of localisation.In Chapter 2 we show that while strict localisation of the free Dirac particle is not describable within the usual mathematical formalism, in terms of Dirac's position operator x it is possible to describe sequences of positive-energy states whose spread Dx = ((x -- x0)2) about a point X0 approaches zero.In Chapter 3 the component states of these sequences are used as the basis of a full causally well-behaved solution to the localisation problem for the free electron, with natural space-time transformation properties. It is shown that although x is not an observable in the usual sense, the four-vector density (p(x, t), j(x, t)/c) is observable, and can be localised arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalised at the same time.n n

•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

Asymptotic Momentum of Dirac Particles in One Space Dimension

Kabir Narayanan, Abigail Perryman, A. Shadi Tahvildar-Zadeh

We analyze the trajectories of a massive particle in one space dimension whose motion is guided by a spin-half wave function that evolves according to the free Dirac equation, with its initial wave function being a Gaussian wave packet with a nonzero expected value of momentum $k$. We prove that at large times, the wave function is approximately equal to the superposition of two wave packets traveling in opposite directions, which results in trajectories with approximately constant asymptotic momentum $k$ and asymptotic energy $\pm c^2\sqrt{m^2+k^2}$, with $m$ the rest mass of the particle and $c$ the speed of light. The sign of the asymptotic energy is determined by the initial position of the particle. Particles with negative energy will have an asymptotic velocity that is in the opposite direction of their momentum. The proof uses the stationary phase approximation method, for which we establish a rigorous error bound.

math-phCross-listedarXiv:2512.21423•Dec 26, 2025•0 citations

Possibility of small electron states

Charles T. Sebens

Some authors have claimed that there exists a minimum size (on the order of the Compton radius) for electron states composed entirely of positive-frequency solutions to the free Dirac equation. Other authors have put forward counterexamples to such claims. This article asks how the counterexamples of A. J. Bracken and G. F. Melloy [J. Phys. A. 32, 6127 (1999)] bypass two arguments against their possibility. The first is an old argument that, because of the prohibition on faster-than-light motion, the electron must be larger than a certain minimum size if it is to have the correct angular momentum and magnetic moment. This challenge can be addressed by analyzing the flow of energy and charge for the counterexample states. The second argument is an explicit proof (presented in C.-P. Chuu et al. [Solid State Commun. 150, 533 (2010)]) that there is a minimum size for purely positive-frequency electron states. This proof hinges on the assumption of a small spread in momentum space, which is violated by the counterexamples that have been put forward.

arXiv:2010.16255•Physical Review A•Nov 30, 2020•9 citations

Time Evolution of Gaussian Wave Packets under Dirac Equation with Fluctuating Mass and Potential

Atis Yosprakob, Sujin Suwanna

Localization of relativistic particles have been of great research interests over many decades. We investigate the time evolution of the Gaussian wave packets governed by the one dimensional Dirac equation. For the free Dirac equation, we obtain the evolution profiles analytically in many approximation regimes, and numerical simulations consistent with other numerical schemes. Interesting behaviors such as Zitterbewegung and Klein paradox are exhibited. In particular, the dispersion rate as a function of mass is calculated, and it yields an interesting result that super-massive and massless particles both exhibit no dispersion in free space. For the Dirac equation with random potential or mass, we employ the Chebyshev polynomials expansion of the propagator operator to numerically investigate the probability profiles of the displacement distribution when the potential or mass is uniformly distributed. We observe that the widths of the Gaussian wave packets decrease approximately with the power law of order $o(s^{-ν})$ with $\frac{1}{2}

arXiv:1601.03827•Jan 15, 2016•1 citation

Evolution equations from an epistemic treatment of time

Per Östborn

Relativistically, time $t$ is an observable just like position $r$. In quantum theory, $t$ is a parameter, in contrast to the observable $r$. This discrepancy suggests that there exists a more elaborate formalization of time, which encapsulates both perspectives. Such a formalization is proposed in this paper. The evolution is described in terms of sequential time $n\in \mathbf{\mathbb{N}}$, which is updated each time an event occurs. Sequential time $n$ is separated from relational time $t$, which describes distances between events in space-time. There is a space-time associated with each $n$, in which $t$ represents the knowledge at time $n$ about temporal relations. The evolution of the wave function is described in terms of the parameter $σ$ that interpolates between sequential times $n$. For a free object we obtain a Stueckelberg equation $\frac{d}{dσ}Ψ(r_{4},σ)=\frac{ic^{2}\hbar}{2\langle ε\rangle}\BoxΨ(r_{4},σ)$, where $r_{4}=(r,ict)$. Here $σ$ describes the time $m$ passed between the start of the experiment at time $n$ and the observation at time $n+m$. The parametrization is assumed to be natural, meaning that $\frac{d}{dσ}\langle t\rangle=1$, where $\langle t\rangle$ is the expected temporal distance between the events that define $n$ and $n+m$. The squared rest energy $ε_{0}^{2}$ is proportional to the eigenvalue $\tildeσ$ that describes a 'stationary state' $Ψ(r_{4},σ)=ψ(r_{4},\tildeσ)e^{i\tildeσσ}$. The Dirac equation follows as a `square root' of the stationary state equation from the condition that $\tildeσ>0$, which follows from the directed nature of $n$. The formalism thus implies that all observable objects have non-zero rest mass, including elementary fermions. The introduction of $n$ releases $t$, so that it can be treated as an observable with uncertainty $Δt$.

arXiv:1801.03396•Jan 10, 2018•0 citations
Highly localized positive-energy states of the free Dirac electron are constructed and shown to evolve in a simple way under the action of Dirac's equation. When the initial uncertainty in position is small on the scale of the Compton wavelength, there is an associated uncertainty in the mean energy that is large compared with the rest mass of the electron. However, this does not lead to any breakdown of the one-particle description, associated with the possibility of pair-production, but rather leads to a rapid expansion of the probability density outwards from the point of localization, at speeds close to the speed of light.
It is known that any positive-energy state of a free Dirac particle that is initially highly localized evolves in time by spreading at speeds close to the speed of light. As recently indicated by Strauch, this general phenomenon, and the resulting ``two-horned'' distributions of position probability along any axis through the point of initial localization, can be interpreted in terms of a quantum random walk, in which the roles of ``coin'' and ``walker'' are naturally associated with the spin and translational degrees of freedom in a discretized version of Dirac's equation. We investigate the relationship between these two evolutions analytically and show how the evolved probability density on the xxx axis for the Dirac particle at any time ttt can be obtained from the asymptotic form of the probability distribution for the position of a ``quantum walker.'' The case of a highly localized initial state is discussed as an example.
The concept of position is a basic one in our construction of a model of thenphysical world: yet the theory of localisation in quantum mechanics is fraughtnwith difficulties, especially in the relativistic case. A strictly localised state forna nonrelativistic particle cannot be described by an ordinary function. In thenrelativistic case the problems are manifold. For a free electron, using the Diracnposition operator x, we cannot construct positive-energy states which localisenthe particle within a compact region. Furthermore it has been suggested that anconsistent one-particle description of localisation on a scale small compared tonthe Compton wavelength of the particle is ruled out because pair-productionnwould take place. These matters are dicussed at greater length in Chaptern1, where several proposed localisation schemes (that is, sets of definitions ofnlocalised states and position operators) are reviewed: none of these is deemednwholly satisfactory. Introductory remarks are also made in this chapter aboutnthe remarkable phenomenon of 'probability backflow', which is discussed further below, and which is relevant to our discussion of localisation.In Chapter 2 we show that while strict localisation of the free Dirac particle is not describable within the usual mathematical formalism, in terms of Dirac's position operator x it is possible to describe sequences of positive-energy states whose spread Dx = ((x -- x0)2) about a point X0 approaches zero.In Chapter 3 the component states of these sequences are used as the basis of a full causally well-behaved solution to the localisation problem for the free electron, with natural space-time transformation properties. It is shown that although x is not an observable in the usual sense, the four-vector density (p(x, t), j(x, t)/c) is observable, and can be localised arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalised at the same time.n n
We analyze the trajectories of a massive particle in one space dimension whose motion is guided by a spin-half wave function that evolves according to the free Dirac equation, with its initial wave function being a Gaussian wave packet with a nonzero expected value of momentum kkk. We prove that at large times, the wave function is approximately equal to the superposition of two wave packets traveling in opposite directions, which results in trajectories with approximately constant asymptotic momentum kkk and asymptotic energy ±c2m2+k2\pm c^2\sqrt{m^2+k^2}±c2m2+k2​, with mmm the rest mass of the particle and ccc the speed of light. The sign of the asymptotic energy is determined by the initial position of the particle. Particles with negative energy will have an asymptotic velocity that is in the opposite direction of their momentum. The proof uses the stationary phase approximation method, for which we establish a rigorous error bound.
Some authors have claimed that there exists a minimum size (on the order of the Compton radius) for electron states composed entirely of positive-frequency solutions to the free Dirac equation. Other authors have put forward counterexamples to such claims. This article asks how the counterexamples of A. J. Bracken and G. F. Melloy [J. Phys. A. 32, 6127 (1999)] bypass two arguments against their possibility. The first is an old argument that, because of the prohibition on faster-than-light motion, the electron must be larger than a certain minimum size if it is to have the correct angular momentum and magnetic moment. This challenge can be addressed by analyzing the flow of energy and charge for the counterexample states. The second argument is an explicit proof (presented in C.-P. Chuu et al. [Solid State Commun. 150, 533 (2010)]) that there is a minimum size for purely positive-frequency electron states. This proof hinges on the assumption of a small spread in momentum space, which is violated by the counterexamples that have been put forward.
Localization of relativistic particles have been of great research interests over many decades. We investigate the time evolution of the Gaussian wave packets governed by the one dimensional Dirac equation. For the free Dirac equation, we obtain the evolution profiles analytically in many approximation regimes, and numerical simulations consistent with other numerical schemes. Interesting behaviors such as Zitterbewegung and Klein paradox are exhibited. In particular, the dispersion rate as a function of mass is calculated, and it yields an interesting result that super-massive and massless particles both exhibit no dispersion in free space. For the Dirac equation with random potential or mass, we employ the Chebyshev polynomials expansion of the propagator operator to numerically investigate the probability profiles of the displacement distribution when the potential or mass is uniformly distributed. We observe that the widths of the Gaussian wave packets decrease approximately with the power law of order o(s−ν)o(s^{-ν})o(s−ν) with $\frac{1}{2}
Relativistically, time ttt is an observable just like position rrr. In quantum theory, ttt is a parameter, in contrast to the observable rrr. This discrepancy suggests that there exists a more elaborate formalization of time, which encapsulates both perspectives. Such a formalization is proposed in this paper. The evolution is described in terms of sequential time n∈Nn\in \mathbf{\mathbb{N}}n∈N, which is updated each time an event occurs. Sequential time nnn is separated from relational time ttt, which describes distances between events in space-time. There is a space-time associated with each nnn, in which ttt represents the knowledge at time nnn about temporal relations. The evolution of the wave function is described in terms of the parameter σσσ that interpolates between sequential times nnn. For a free object we obtain a Stueckelberg equation ddσΨ(r4,σ)=ic2ℏ2⟨ε⟩□Ψ(r4,σ)\frac{d}{dσ}Ψ(r_{4},σ)=\frac{ic^{2}\hbar}{2\langle ε\rangle}\BoxΨ(r_{4},σ)dσd​Ψ(r4​,σ)=2⟨ε⟩ic2ℏ​□Ψ(r4​,σ), where r4=(r,ict)r_{4}=(r,ict)r4​=(r,ict). Here σσσ describes the time mmm passed between the start of the experiment at time nnn and the observation at time n+mn+mn+m. The parametrization is assumed to be natural, meaning that ddσ⟨t⟩=1\frac{d}{dσ}\langle t\rangle=1dσd​⟨t⟩=1, where ⟨t⟩\langle t\rangle⟨t⟩ is the expected temporal distance between the events that define nnn and n+mn+mn+m. The squared rest energy ε02ε_{0}^{2}ε02​ is proportional to the eigenvalue σ~\tildeσσ~ that describes a 'stationary state' Ψ(r4,σ)=ψ(r4,σ~)eiσ~σΨ(r_{4},σ)=ψ(r_{4},\tildeσ)e^{i\tildeσσ}Ψ(r4​,σ)=ψ(r4​,σ~)eiσ~σ. The Dirac equation follows as a `square root' of the stationary state equation from the condition that σ~>0\tildeσ>0σ~>0, which follows from the directed nature of nnn. The formalism thus implies that all observable objects have non-zero rest mass, including elementary fermions. The introduction of nnn releases ttt, so that it can be treated as an observable with uncertainty ΔtΔtΔt.