Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Efficient linear optical quantum computation

Geoff J. Pryde, Jeremy L. O’Brien, T. B. Bell, Nathan K. Langford, Gerard J Milburn, Timothy C. Ralph, Andrew G. White

Published Jan 1, 2003• 4 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

We consider realizing the efficient linear optical quantum computing scheme of Knill, Laflamme and Milburn [Nature 409, 46 (2001)]. A number of the issues in implementing a coincidence-basis version of a CNOT gate are addressed experimentally, including source brightness and mode quality.

Related papers

Simple scheme for efficient linear optics quantum gates

Timothy C. Ralph, Andrew G. White, William J. Munro +1 more

We describe the construction of a conditional quantum control-NOT (CNOT) gate from linear optical elements following the program of Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn [Nature 409, 46 (2001)]. We show that the basic operation of this gate can be tested using current technology. We then simplify the scheme significantly.

arXiv:quant-ph/0108049•Physical Review A•Dec 12, 2001•205 citations

Experimental Implementation of Efficient Linear Optics Quantum Computation

Gerard J Milburn, Timothy C. Ralph, Andrew G. White

One of the earliest proposals for implementing quantum computation was based on encoding each qubit in two optical modes, each containing exactly one photon. However, it is extremely difficult to unitarily couple two optical modes containing few photons. In 2001, Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn (KLM) found a way to circumvent this restriction and implement efficient quantum computation using only passive linear optics, photodetectors, and single photon sources. This efficient linear optical quantum computing (LOQC) is distinct from other linear optical schemes that are not efficiently scalable. The technological requirements for even the simplest gates in the KLM proposal initially seemed out of reach. However, Ralph, White, Munro and Milburn soon showed that, in principle, demonstrations of key gates and techniques could be achieved with current technology. The objective of the research undertaken in this project was to produce, in three years, a prototype two-qubit gate for photons using the KLM linear optics quantum computation approach, and to develop a blue-print for a multiple qubit device that might be implemented over a longer time scale. A non-deterministic two-qubit gate was demonstrated that operates with high fidelity. A number of key tasks were demonstrated using this gate, and several theoretical investigations of short, medium, and longer term issues for the LOQC approach were successfully completed.

•Nov 25, 2004•0 citations

A simple gate for linear optics quantum computing

Terry Rudolph, Jian-Wei Pan

We describe a simple scheme for implementing the non-linear sign gate of Knill, Laflamme and Milburn (Nature, {\bf 409}, 46-52, Jan. 4 (2001)) which forms the basis of an experiment underway at the University of Vienna.

arXiv:quant-ph/0108056•Aug 11, 2001•5 citations

Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits

Pieter Kok, William J. Munro, Kae Nemoto +3 more

Linear optics with photon counting is a prominent candidate for practical quantum computing. The protocol by Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn [2001, Nature (London) 409, 46] explicitly demonstrates that efficient scalable quantum computing with single photons, linear optical elements, and projective measurements is possible. Subsequently, several improvements on this protocol have started to bridge the gap between theoretical scalability and practical implementation. The original theory and its improvements are reviewed, and a few examples of experimental two-qubit gates are given. The use of realistic components, the errors they induce in the computation, and how these errors can be corrected is discussed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0512071•Reviews of Modern Physics•Jan 24, 2007•2,840 citations

Efficient parity-encoded optical quantum computing

Alexei Gilchrist, Anthony Hayes, Timothy C. Ralph

We present a linear optics quantum computation scheme with a greatly reduced cost in resources compared to that proposed by Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn (KLM). The scheme makes use of elements from cluster state computation but retains the circuit based approach of KLM.

arXiv:quant-ph/0505125•Physical Review A•May 22, 2007•26 citations

Experimental requirements for Grover’s algorithm in optical quantum computation

Jennifer L. Dodd, Timothy C. Ralph, Gerard J Milburn

The field of linear optical quantum computation (LOQC) will soon need a repertoire of experimental milestones. We make progress in this direction by describing several experiments based on Grover's algorithm. These experiments range from a relatively simple implementation using only a single nonscalable controlled-NOT (CNOT) gate to the most complex, requiring two concatenated scalable CNOT gates, and thus form a useful set of early milestones for LOQC. We also give a complete description of basic LOQC using polarization-encoded qubits, making use of many simplifications to the original scheme of Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn [E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001)].

arXiv:quant-ph/0306081•Physical Review A•Oct 24, 2003•32 citations
One of the earliest proposals for implementing quantum computation was based on encoding each qubit in two optical modes, each containing exactly one photon. However, it is extremely difficult to unitarily couple two optical modes containing few photons. In 2001, Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn (KLM) found a way to circumvent this restriction and implement efficient quantum computation using only passive linear optics, photodetectors, and single photon sources. This efficient linear optical quantum computing (LOQC) is distinct from other linear optical schemes that are not efficiently scalable. The technological requirements for even the simplest gates in the KLM proposal initially seemed out of reach. However, Ralph, White, Munro and Milburn soon showed that, in principle, demonstrations of key gates and techniques could be achieved with current technology. The objective of the research undertaken in this project was to produce, in three years, a prototype two-qubit gate for photons using the KLM linear optics quantum computation approach, and to develop a blue-print for a multiple qubit device that might be implemented over a longer time scale. A non-deterministic two-qubit gate was demonstrated that operates with high fidelity. A number of key tasks were demonstrated using this gate, and several theoretical investigations of short, medium, and longer term issues for the LOQC approach were successfully completed.
Linear optics with photon counting is a prominent candidate for practical quantum computing. The protocol by Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn [2001, Nature (London) 409, 46] explicitly demonstrates that efficient scalable quantum computing with single photons, linear optical elements, and projective measurements is possible. Subsequently, several improvements on this protocol have started to bridge the gap between theoretical scalability and practical implementation. The original theory and its improvements are reviewed, and a few examples of experimental two-qubit gates are given. The use of realistic components, the errors they induce in the computation, and how these errors can be corrected is discussed.
The field of linear optical quantum computation (LOQC) will soon need a repertoire of experimental milestones. We make progress in this direction by describing several experiments based on Grover's algorithm. These experiments range from a relatively simple implementation using only a single nonscalable controlled-NOT (CNOT) gate to the most complex, requiring two concatenated scalable CNOT gates, and thus form a useful set of early milestones for LOQC. We also give a complete description of basic LOQC using polarization-encoded qubits, making use of many simplifications to the original scheme of Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn [E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001)].