Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The European Physical Journal D

Quantum decoherence from adiabatic entanglement with external one or a few degrees of freedom

C. P. Sun, D. L. Zhou, Sixia Yu, Xingzhong Liu

Published Jan 1, 2001• 17 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s100530170295

Related papers

Decoherence and entanglement in quantum systems

Journal of Russian Laser Research•Sep 1, 2007•0 citations

Decoherence, entanglement and irreversibility in quantum dynamical systems with few degrees of freedom

Philippe Jacquod, Cyril Petitjean

In this review we summarize and amplify recent investigations of coupled quantum dynamical systems with few degrees of freedom in the short-wavelength, semiclassical limit. Focusing on the correspondence between quantum and classical physics, we mathematically formulate and attempt to answer three fundamental questions. (i) How can one drive a small dynamical quantum system to behave classically? (ii) What determines the rate at which two single-particle quantum-mechanical subsystems become entangled when they interact? (iii) How does irreversibility occur in quantum systems with few degrees of freedom? These three questions are posed in the context of the quantum-classical correspondence for dynamical systems with few degrees of freedom, and we accordingly rely on two short-wavelength approximations to quantum mechanics to answer them: the trajectory-based semiclassical approach on the one hand, and random matrix theory on the other hand. We construct novel investigative procedures towards decoherence and the emergence of classicality out of quantumness in dynamical systems coupled to external degrees of freedom. In particular, we show how dynamical properties of chaotic classical systems, such as local exponential instability in phase space, also affects their quantum counterparts. For instance, it is often the case that the fidelity with which a quantum state is reconstructed after an imperfect time-reversal operation decays with the Lyapunov exponent of the corresponding classical dynamics. For related reasons, but perhaps more surprisingly, the rate at which two interacting quantum subsystems become entangled can also be governed by the subsystem's Lyapunov exponents. Our method allows us to differentiate quantum coherent effects (those related to phase interferences) from classical ones (those related to the necessarily extended envelope of quantal wavefunctions) at each stage in our investigations. This makes it clear that all occurrences of Lyapunov exponents we witness have a classical origin, although they require rather strong decoherence effects to be observed. We extensively rely on numerical experiments to illustrate our findings and briefly comment on possible extensions to more complex problems involving environments with many interacting dynamical systems, going beyond the uncoupled harmonic oscillators model of Caldeira and Leggett.

arXiv:0806.0987•Advances In Physics•Mar 1, 2009•182 citations

Quantum decoherence and quasi-equilibrium in open quantum systems with few degrees of freedom: Application to 1H NMR of nematic liquid crystals

H. H. Segnorile, R. C. Zamar

Explanation of decoherence and quasi-equilibrium in systems with few degrees of freedom demands a deep theoretical analysis that considers the observed system as an open quantum system. In this work, we study the problem of decoherence of an observed system of quantum interacting particles, coupled to a quantum lattice. Our strategy is based on treating the environment and the system-environment Hamiltonians fully quantum mechanically, which yields a representation of the time evolution operator useful for disentangling the different time scales underlying in the observed system dynamics. To describe the possible different stages of the dynamics of the observed system, we introduce quantum mechanical definitions of essentially isolated, essentially adiabatic, and thermal-contact system-environment interactions. This general approach is then applied to the study of decoherence and quasi-equilibrium in proton nuclear magnetic resonance ((1)H NMR) of nematic liquid crystals. A summary of the original results of this work is as follows. We calculate the decoherence function and apply it to describe the evolution of a coherent spin state, induced by the coupling with the molecular environment, in absence of spin-lattice relaxation. By assuming quantum energy conserving or non-demolition interactions, we identify an intermediate time scale, between those controlled by self-interactions and thermalization, where coherence decays irreversibly. This treatment is also adequate for explaining the buildup of quasi-equilibrium of the proton spin system, via the process we called eigen-selectivity. By analyzing a hypothetical time reversal experiment, we identify two sources of coherence loss which are of a very different nature and give rise to distinct time scales of the spin dynamics: (a) reversible or adiabatic quantum decoherence and (b) irreversible or essentially adiabatic quantum decoherence. Local irreversibility arises as a consequence of the uncertainty introduced by the coupling with an infinite quantum environment. The reversible part can be represented by a semiclassical model, similar to standard line-shape adiabatic models. By exploiting the separation existing between the time scales of the spin coherences and the irreversible decoherence, we present a novel technique to obtain the orientational molecular distribution function for a nematic liquid crystal. The procedure is based on the comparison of the observed coherence time evolution and numerical calculation under the adiabatic quantum decoherence approach. As an example, it is used the experimental free induction decay from a nematic PAA(d6) sample to extract such an orientational distribution. This is the first theoretical description of the experimental liquid crystal NMR signal in the time domain. On the contrary, the irreversible decoherence is intrinsically full-quantum mechanical, as it is governed by the commutation properties of the environment and the spin-lattice Hamiltonians. Consistently, it depends on the molecular correlation in a decisive way, since it vanishes under a mean-field model for the molecular dynamics. The results of this work can contribute to the understanding of the open question of the applicability of the spin-temperature concept in spin systems with few degrees of freedom.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Dec 28, 2011•11 citations

Quantum Decoherence and Entanglement in Quantum Information

A.‐S. F. Obada, Abdel‐Baset A. Mohamed, Hosney A. Hessein

•Oct 17, 2011•0 citations

Quantum decoherence and entanglement in Markov and non-Markov systems

Konstantin Chudnovskiy

•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Quantum Decoherence

Elise M. Crull

Quantum decoherence is a physical process resulting from a system’s entanglement with an environment. This chapter examines the explanatory wealth of decoherence when brought to bear on foundational issues such as the question of why certain measurement bases seem to be preferred by nature – including the pointer basis of measuring apparatuses – the old familiar measurement problem, and the emergence of classicality. Decoherence satisfactorily explains the behavior of the ammonia molecule. Decoherence introduces no additional nonlinearity but “simply takes real, inevitable, interaction with external degrees of freedom to bear in the Hamiltonian”. The basis-specific nature of decoherence will allow for a satisfying explanation to one of quantum mechanics’ oldest mysteries: that of the pointer basis. The basis-specific nature of decoherence will allow for a satisfying explanation to one of quantum mechanics’ oldest mysteries: that of the pointer basis.

Routledge eBooks•Aug 11, 2021•18 citations
In this review we summarize and amplify recent investigations of coupled quantum dynamical systems with few degrees of freedom in the short-wavelength, semiclassical limit. Focusing on the correspondence between quantum and classical physics, we mathematically formulate and attempt to answer three fundamental questions. (i) How can one drive a small dynamical quantum system to behave classically? (ii) What determines the rate at which two single-particle quantum-mechanical subsystems become entangled when they interact? (iii) How does irreversibility occur in quantum systems with few degrees of freedom? These three questions are posed in the context of the quantum-classical correspondence for dynamical systems with few degrees of freedom, and we accordingly rely on two short-wavelength approximations to quantum mechanics to answer them: the trajectory-based semiclassical approach on the one hand, and random matrix theory on the other hand. We construct novel investigative procedures towards decoherence and the emergence of classicality out of quantumness in dynamical systems coupled to external degrees of freedom. In particular, we show how dynamical properties of chaotic classical systems, such as local exponential instability in phase space, also affects their quantum counterparts. For instance, it is often the case that the fidelity with which a quantum state is reconstructed after an imperfect time-reversal operation decays with the Lyapunov exponent of the corresponding classical dynamics. For related reasons, but perhaps more surprisingly, the rate at which two interacting quantum subsystems become entangled can also be governed by the subsystem's Lyapunov exponents. Our method allows us to differentiate quantum coherent effects (those related to phase interferences) from classical ones (those related to the necessarily extended envelope of quantal wavefunctions) at each stage in our investigations. This makes it clear that all occurrences of Lyapunov exponents we witness have a classical origin, although they require rather strong decoherence effects to be observed. We extensively rely on numerical experiments to illustrate our findings and briefly comment on possible extensions to more complex problems involving environments with many interacting dynamical systems, going beyond the uncoupled harmonic oscillators model of Caldeira and Leggett.
Explanation of decoherence and quasi-equilibrium in systems with few degrees of freedom demands a deep theoretical analysis that considers the observed system as an open quantum system. In this work, we study the problem of decoherence of an observed system of quantum interacting particles, coupled to a quantum lattice. Our strategy is based on treating the environment and the system-environment Hamiltonians fully quantum mechanically, which yields a representation of the time evolution operator useful for disentangling the different time scales underlying in the observed system dynamics. To describe the possible different stages of the dynamics of the observed system, we introduce quantum mechanical definitions of essentially isolated, essentially adiabatic, and thermal-contact system-environment interactions. This general approach is then applied to the study of decoherence and quasi-equilibrium in proton nuclear magnetic resonance ((1)H NMR) of nematic liquid crystals. A summary of the original results of this work is as follows. We calculate the decoherence function and apply it to describe the evolution of a coherent spin state, induced by the coupling with the molecular environment, in absence of spin-lattice relaxation. By assuming quantum energy conserving or non-demolition interactions, we identify an intermediate time scale, between those controlled by self-interactions and thermalization, where coherence decays irreversibly. This treatment is also adequate for explaining the buildup of quasi-equilibrium of the proton spin system, via the process we called eigen-selectivity. By analyzing a hypothetical time reversal experiment, we identify two sources of coherence loss which are of a very different nature and give rise to distinct time scales of the spin dynamics: (a) reversible or adiabatic quantum decoherence and (b) irreversible or essentially adiabatic quantum decoherence. Local irreversibility arises as a consequence of the uncertainty introduced by the coupling with an infinite quantum environment. The reversible part can be represented by a semiclassical model, similar to standard line-shape adiabatic models. By exploiting the separation existing between the time scales of the spin coherences and the irreversible decoherence, we present a novel technique to obtain the orientational molecular distribution function for a nematic liquid crystal. The procedure is based on the comparison of the observed coherence time evolution and numerical calculation under the adiabatic quantum decoherence approach. As an example, it is used the experimental free induction decay from a nematic PAA(d6) sample to extract such an orientational distribution. This is the first theoretical description of the experimental liquid crystal NMR signal in the time domain. On the contrary, the irreversible decoherence is intrinsically full-quantum mechanical, as it is governed by the commutation properties of the environment and the spin-lattice Hamiltonians. Consistently, it depends on the molecular correlation in a decisive way, since it vanishes under a mean-field model for the molecular dynamics. The results of this work can contribute to the understanding of the open question of the applicability of the spin-temperature concept in spin systems with few degrees of freedom.
Quantum decoherence is a physical process resulting from a system’s entanglement with an environment. This chapter examines the explanatory wealth of decoherence when brought to bear on foundational issues such as the question of why certain measurement bases seem to be preferred by nature – including the pointer basis of measuring apparatuses – the old familiar measurement problem, and the emergence of classicality. Decoherence satisfactorily explains the behavior of the ammonia molecule. Decoherence introduces no additional nonlinearity but “simply takes real, inevitable, interaction with external degrees of freedom to bear in the Hamiltonian”. The basis-specific nature of decoherence will allow for a satisfying explanation to one of quantum mechanics’ oldest mysteries: that of the pointer basis. The basis-specific nature of decoherence will allow for a satisfying explanation to one of quantum mechanics’ oldest mysteries: that of the pointer basis.