Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Complex mass in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics

Anton�n Kyselka

Published Jan 1, 1981• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00670995

Related papers

Transformation of complex diffusion processes and nonrelativistic quantum mechanics

Bernard H. Lavenda, Enrico Santamato

Physics Letters A•May 1, 1980•3 citations

Transformation of complex diffusion processes and nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. - II

Bernard H. Lavenda, Enrico Santamato

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Jul 1, 1980•2 citations

Nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics

Walter T. Grandy

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1991•27 citations

Galilei Group and Nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics

Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond

This paper is devoted to the study of the Galilei group and its representations. The Galilei group presents a certain number of essential differences with respect to the Poincaré group. As Bargmann showed, its physical representations, here explicitly constructed, are not true representations but only up-to-a-factor ones. Consequently, in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, the mass has a very special role, and in fact, gives rise to a superselection rule which prevents the existence of unstable particles. The internal energy of a nonrelativistic system is known to be an arbitrary parameter; this is shown to come also from Galilean invariance, because of a nontrivial concept of equivalence between physical representations. On the contrary, the behavior of an elementary system with respect to rotations, is very similar to the relativistic case. We show here, in particular, how the number of polarization states reduces to two for the zero-mass case (though in fact there are no physical zero-mass systems in nonrelativistic mechanics). Finally, we study the two-particle system, where the orbital angular momenta quite naturally introduce themselves through the decomposition of the tensor product of two physical representations.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1963•241 citations

Inadequacy of the Usual Galilean Transformation in Quantum Mechanics

Daniel M. Greenberger

We show that the superselection rule in the Galilean transformation, forbidding the superposition of states of different mass, in inconsistent with the nonrelativistic limit of the Lorentz transformation. We also point out that the extra Galilean phase is merely the residue of the "twin-paradox" effect, which does not vanish nonrelativistically. In general, there are phase effects due to proper time differences, and effects due to mass-energy equivalence, that do not vanish nonrelativistically but that are not handled adequately by the Galilean transformation.

Physical Review Letters•Aug 21, 2001•48 citations

Nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics

ANTON Z. CAPRI

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Nov 1, 2002•35 citations
This paper is devoted to the study of the Galilei group and its representations. The Galilei group presents a certain number of essential differences with respect to the Poincaré group. As Bargmann showed, its physical representations, here explicitly constructed, are not true representations but only up-to-a-factor ones. Consequently, in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, the mass has a very special role, and in fact, gives rise to a superselection rule which prevents the existence of unstable particles. The internal energy of a nonrelativistic system is known to be an arbitrary parameter; this is shown to come also from Galilean invariance, because of a nontrivial concept of equivalence between physical representations. On the contrary, the behavior of an elementary system with respect to rotations, is very similar to the relativistic case. We show here, in particular, how the number of polarization states reduces to two for the zero-mass case (though in fact there are no physical zero-mass systems in nonrelativistic mechanics). Finally, we study the two-particle system, where the orbital angular momenta quite naturally introduce themselves through the decomposition of the tensor product of two physical representations.
We show that the superselection rule in the Galilean transformation, forbidding the superposition of states of different mass, in inconsistent with the nonrelativistic limit of the Lorentz transformation. We also point out that the extra Galilean phase is merely the residue of the "twin-paradox" effect, which does not vanish nonrelativistically. In general, there are phase effects due to proper time differences, and effects due to mass-energy equivalence, that do not vanish nonrelativistically but that are not handled adequately by the Galilean transformation.