We present two new quantum algorithms that either find a triangle (a copy of K3) in an undirected graph G on n nodes, or reject if G is triangle free. The first algorithm uses combinatorial ideas with Grover Search and makes Õ(n10/7) queries. The second algorithm uses Õ(n13/10) queries, and it is based on a design concept of Ambainis [6] that incorporates the benefits of quantum walks into Grover search [18]. The first algorithm uses only O(log n) qubits in its quantum subroutines, whereas the second one uses O(n) qubits. The Triangle Problem was first treated in [12], where an algorithm with O(n + √ nm) query complexity was presented, where m is the number of edges of G.
We present two new quantum algorithms that either find a triangle (a copy of K3) in an undirected graph G on n nodes, or reject if G is triangle free. The first algorithm uses combinatorial ideas with Grover Search and makes Õ(n10/7) queries. The second algorithm uses Õ(n13/10) queries, and it is based on a design concept of Ambainis [6] that incorporates the benefits of quantum walks into Grover search [18]. The first algorithm uses only O(log n) qubits in its quantum subroutines, whereas the second one uses O(n) qubits. The Triangle Problem was first treated in [12], where an algorithm with O(n + √ nm) query complexity was presented, where m is the number of edges of G.
We present two new quantum algorithms that either find a triangle (a copy of K3) in an undirected graph G on n nodes, or reject if G is triangle free. The first algorithm uses combinatorial ideas with Grover Search and makes O~(n10/7) queries. The second algorithm uses O~(n13/10) queries and is based on a design concept of Ambainis [in Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2004, pp. 22–31] that incorporates the benefits of quantum walks into Grover Search [L. Grover, in Proceedings of the Twenty‐Eighth ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1996, pp. 212–219]. The first algorithm uses only O(logn) qubits in its quantum subroutines, whereas the second one uses O(n) qubits. The Triangle Problem was first treated in [H. Buhrman et al., SIAM J. Comput., 34 (2005), pp. 1324–1330], where an algorithm with O(n+nm) query complexity was presented, where m is the number of edges of G.
An O(n1.3) Quantum Algorithm for the Triangle Problem
We present a new quantum algorithm that either finds a triangle (a copy of K3) in an undirected graph G on n nodes, or it outputs “reject ” if G is triangle free. The algorithm uses O(n 1.3) queries, and it is based on a new design concept of Ambainis [Amb03] that incorporates the benefits of quantum walks into Grover search [Gro96]. The algorithm both improves on, and is simpler than a recent algorithm of Szegedy [Sze03] which has Õ(n10/7) query complexity. The Triangle Problem was first treated in [BDH + 01], where an algorithm with O ( √ n|E|) query complexity was presented (here |E | is the number of edges of G). 1
In this paper we present a quantum algorithm solving the triangle finding problem in unweighted graphs with query complexity Õ(n5/4), where n denotes the number of vertices in the graph. This improves the previous upper bound O(n9/7) = O(n1.285) recently obtained by Lee, Magniez and Santha. Our result shows, for the first time, that in the quantum query complexity setting unweighted triangle finding is easier than its edge-weighted version, since for finding an edge-weighted triangle Belovs and Rosmanis proved that any quantum algorithm requires O(n9/7/ √log n) queries. Our result also illustrates some limitations of the non-adaptive learning graph approach used to obtain the previous O(n9/7) upper bound since, even over unweighted graphs, any quantum algorithm for triangle finding obtained using this approach requires v(n9/7/ √log n) queries as well. To bypass the obstacles characterized by these lower bounds, our quantum algorithm uses combinatorial ideas exploiting the graph-theoretic properties of triangle finding, which cannot be used when considering edge-weighted graphs or the non-adaptive learning graph approach.
We show that the quantum query complexity of detecting if an n-vertex graph contains a triangle is O(n9/7). This improves the previous best algorithm of Belovs [2] making O(n35/27) queries. For the problem of determining if an operation o : S × S → S is associative, we give an algorithm making O(|S|10/7) queries, the first improvement to the trivial O(|S|3/2) application of Grover search. Our algorithms are designed using the learning graph framework of Belovs. We give a family of algorithms for detecting constant-sized subgraphs, which can possibly be directed and colored. These algorithms are designed in a simple high-level language; our main theorem shows how this high-level language can be compiled as a learning graph and gives the resulting complexity. The key idea to our improvements is to allow more freedom in the parameters of the database kept by the algorithm. As in our previous work [9], the edge slots maintained in the database are specified by a graph whose edges are the union of regular bipartite graphs, the overall structure of which mimics that of the graph of the certificate. By allowing these bipartite graphs to be unbalanced and of variable degree we obtain better algorithms.
We present new quantum algorithms for Triangle Finding improving its best previously known quantum query complexities for both dense and sparse instances. For dense graphs on n vertices, we get a query complexity of O(n^(5/4)) without any of the extra logarithmic factors present in the previous algorithm of Le Gall [FOCS'14]. For sparse graphs with m >= n^(5/4) edges, we get a query complexity of O(n^(11/12) m^(1/6) sqrt(log n)), which is better than the one obtained by Le Gall and Nakajima [ISAAC'15] when m >= n^(3/2). We also obtain an algorithm with query complexity O(n^(5/6) (m log n)^(1/6) + d_2 sqrt(n)) where d_2 is the variance of the degree distribution. Our algorithms are designed and analyzed in a new model of learning graphs that we call extended learning graphs. In addition, we present a framework in order to easily combine and analyze them. As a consequence we get much simpler algorithms and analyses than previous algorithms of Le Gall based on the MNRS quantum walk framework [SICOMP'11].
Recently, Ambainis gave an O(N^(2/3))-query quantum walk algorithm for element distinctness, and more generally, an O(N^(L/(L+1)))-query algorithm for finding L equal numbers. We point out that this algorithm actually solves a much more general problem, the problem of finding a subset of size L that satisfies any given property. We review the algorithm and give a considerably simplified analysis of its query complexity. We present several applications, including two algorithms for the problem of finding an L-clique in an N-vertex graph. One of these algorithms uses O(N^(2L/(L+1))) edge queries, and the other uses \\tilde{O}(N^((5L-2)/(2L+4))), which is an improvement for L <= 5. The latter algorithm generalizes a recent result of Magniez, Santha, and Szegedy, who considered the case L=3 (finding a triangle). We also pose two open problems regarding continuous time quantum walk and lower bounds.