Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)

Secure degrees of freedom of the Gaussian multiple access wiretap channel

Jianwei Xie, Şennur Ulukuş

Published Jul 1, 2013• 36 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We show that the sum secure degrees of freedom (d.o.f.) of the K-user Gaussian multiple access (MAC) wiretap channel is K(K-1)/K(K-1)+1. Our achievability is based on real interference alignment and structured cooperative jamming. Each user divides its message into K - 1 sub-messages, and sends a linear combination of signals carrying these sub-messages together with a structured cooperative jamming signal. All cooperative jamming signals are aligned in a single dimension at the legitimate receiver allowing for reliable decoding of the message carrying signals by the legitimate receiver. Each cooperative jamming signal is aligned with K-1 message signals at the eavesdropper limiting the information leakage rate to the eavesdropper. We provide a matching converse establishing the exact sum secure d.o.f. of the Gaussian MAC wiretap channel as K(K-1)/K(K-1)+1.

DOI
10.1109/isit.2013.6620444

Related papers

Secure Degrees of Freedom of One-Hop Wireless Networks

Jianwei Xie, Şennur Ulukuş

We study the secure degrees of freedom (d.o.f.) of one-hop wireless networks by considering four fundamental wireless network structures: 1) Gaussian wiretap channel; 2) Gaussian broadcast channel with confidential messages; 3) Gaussian interference channel with confidential messages; and 4) Gaussian multiple access wiretap channel. The secrecy capacity of the canonical Gaussian wiretap channel does not scale with the transmit power, and hence, the secure d.o.f. of the Gaussian wiretap channel with no helpers is zero. It has been known that a strictly positive secure d.o.f. can be obtained in the Gaussian wiretap channel by using a helper, which sends structured cooperative signals. We show that the exact secure d.o.f. of the Gaussian wiretap channel with a helper is 1/2. Our achievable scheme is based on real interference alignment and cooperative jamming, which renders the message signal and the cooperative jamming signal separable at the legitimate receiver, but aligns them perfectly at the eavesdropper preventing any reliable decoding of the message signal. Our converse is based on two key lemmas. The first lemma quantifies the secrecy penalty by showing that the net effect of an eavesdropper on the system is that it eliminates one of the independent channel inputs. The second lemma quantifies the role of a helper by developing a direct relationship between the cooperative jamming signal of a helper and the message rate. We extend this result to the case of M helpers, and show that the exact secure d.o.f. in this case is M/M+1.We then generalize this approach to more general network structures with multiple messages. We show that the sum secure d.o.f. of the Gaussian broadcast channel with confidential messages and M helpers is 1, the sum secure d.o.f. of the twouser interference channel with confidential messages is 2/3, the sum secure d.o.f. of the two-user interference channel with confidential messages and M helpers is 1, and the sum secure d.o.f. of the K-user multiple access wiretap channel is K(K-1)/K(K-1)+1.

arXiv:1209.5370•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Apr 4, 2014•136 citations

Secure degrees of freedom of the Gaussian wiretap channel with helpers

Jianwei Xie, Şennur Ulukuş

The secrecy capacity of the canonical Gaussian wiretap channel does not scale with the transmit power, and hence, the secure d.o.f. of the Gaussian wiretap channel with no helpers is zero. It has been known that a strictly positive secure d.o.f. can be obtained in the Gaussian wiretap channel by using a helper which sends structured cooperative signals. We show that the exact secure d.o.f. of the Gaussian wiretap channel with a helper is 1/2. Our achievable scheme is based on real interference alignment and cooperative jamming, which renders the message signal and the cooperative jamming signal separable at the legitimate receiver, but aligns them perfectly at the eavesdropper preventing any reliable decoding of the message signal. Our converse is based on two key lemmas. The first lemma quantifies the secrecy penalty by showing that the net effect of an eavesdropper on the system is that it eliminates one of the independent channel inputs. The second lemma quantifies the role of a helper by developing a direct relationship between the cooperative jamming signal of a helper and the message rate. We extend this result to the case of M helpers, and show that the exact secure d.o.f. in this case is M/M+1.

Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing•Oct 1, 2012•35 citations

Secure Degrees of Freedom of Multiuser Networks: One-Time-Pads in the Air via Alignment

Jianwei Xie, Şennur Ulukuş

We revisit the recent secure degrees of freedom (s.d.o.f.) results for one-hop multiuser wireless networks by considering three fundamental wireless network structures: Gaussian wiretap channel with helpers, Gaussian multiple access wiretap channel, and Gaussian interference channel with secrecy constraints. We present main enabling tools and resulting communication schemes in an expository manner, along with key insights and design principles emerging from them. The main achievable schemes are based on real interference alignment, channel prefixing via cooperative jamming, and structured signalling. Real interference alignment enables aligning the cooperative jamming signals together with the message carrying signals at the eavesdroppers to protect them akin to one-time-pad protecting messages in wired systems. Real interference alignment also enables decodability at the legitimate receivers by rendering message carrying and cooperative jamming signals separable, and simultaneously aligning the cooperative jamming signals in the smallest possible subspace. The main converse techniques are based on two key lemmas which quantify the secrecy penalty by showing that the net effect of an eavesdropper on the system is that it eliminates one of the independent channel inputs; and the role of a helper by developing a direct relationship between the cooperative jamming signal of a helper and the message rate. These two lemmas when applied according to the unique structure of individual networks provide tight converses. Finally, we present a blind cooperative jamming scheme for the helper network with no eavesdropper channel state information at the transmitters that achieves the same optimal s.d.o.f. as in the case of full eavesdropper channel state information.

arXiv:1507.02266•Proceedings of the IEEE•Aug 18, 2015•9 citations

Secure Degrees of Freedom of $K$ -User Gaussian Interference Channels: A Unified View

Jianwei Xie, Şennur Ulukuş

We determine the exact sum secure degrees of freedom (d.o.f.) of the K-user Gaussian interference channel. We consider three different secrecy constraints: 1) K-user interference channel with one external eavesdropper (IC-EE); 2) K-user interference channel with confidential messages (IC-CM); and 3) K-user interference channel with confidential messages and one external eavesdropper (IC-CM-EE). We show that for all of these three cases, the exact sum secure d.o.f. is K(K - 1)/(2K - 1). We show converses for IC-EE and IC-CM, which imply a converse for IC-CM-EE. We show achievability for IC-CM-EE, which implies achievability for IC-EE and IC-CM. Our converse is based on developing a direct relationship between the differential entropies of the channel inputs and the rates of the users, and quantifying the effect of eavesdropping on the rates in terms of the differential entropies of the eavesdroppers' observations. Our achievability is based on structured signaling, structured cooperative jamming, channel prefixing, and asymptotic real interference alignment. While the traditional interference alignment provides some amount of secrecy by mixing unintended signals in a smaller subspace at every receiver, in order to attain the optimum sum secure d.o.f., we incorporate structured cooperative jamming into the achievable scheme, and intricately design the structure of all of the transmitted signals jointly.

arXiv:1305.7214•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Mar 9, 2015•81 citations

SECURE DEGREES OF FREEDOM OF WIRELESS NETWORKS

Jianwei Xie

This dissertation studies the security of wireless interference networks from an information-theoretic point of view. In this setting, several transmitter-receiver pairs wish to have secure communication against the eavesdropper(s). The central goal of this dissertation is to develop a framework based on information-theoretic principles to determine the complete solutions for the signaling schemes in different wireless interference networks with large transmit powers, and derive the corresponding fundamental limits in terms of the secure degrees of freedom (s.d.o.f.). Next, we study one-hop wireless networks by considering four fundamental wireless network structures: Gaussian wiretap channel with helpers, Gaussian broadcast channel (BC) with confidential messages, Gaussian interference channel (IC) with confidential messages, and Gaussian multiple access (MAC) wiretap channel. The secrecy capacity of the canonical Gaussian wiretap channel does not scale with the transmit power, and hence, the s.d.o.f. of the Gaussian wiretap channel with no helpers is zero. We show that the exact s.d.o.f. of the Gaussian wiretap channel with a helper is 1/2. Our achievable scheme is based on real interference alignment and cooperative jamming, which renders the message signal and the cooperative jamming signal separable at the legitimate receiver, but aligns them perfectly at the eavesdropper preventing any reliable decoding of the message signal. Our converse is based on two key lemmas. The first lemma quantifies the secrecy penalty by showing that the net effect of an eavesdropper on the system is that it eliminates one of the independent channel inputs. The second lemma quantifies the role of a helper by developing a direct relationship between the cooperative jamming signal of a helper and the message rate. We extend this result to the case of M helpers, and show that the exact s.d.o.f. in this case is M/(M+1). We then generalize this approach to more general network structures with multiple messages. We show that the sum s.d.o.f. of the Gaussian BC with confidential messages and M helpers is 1, the sum s.d.o.f. of the two-user IC with confidential messages is 2/3, the sum s.d.o.f. of the two-user IC with confidential messages and M helpers is 1, and the sum s.d.o.f. of the K-user MAC wiretap channel is K(K-1)/(K(K-1)+1). Then, we study the sum s.d.o.f. of multi-receiver networks. In this dissertation, we determine the exact sum s.d.o.f. of the K-user Gaussian IC. We consider three different secrecy constraints: 1) K-user IC with one external eavesdropper (IC-EE), 2) K-user IC with confidential messages (IC-CM), and 3) K-user IC with confidential messages and one external eavesdropper (IC-CM-EE). We show that for all of these three cases, the exact sum secure d.o.f. is K(K-1)/(2K-1). We show converses for IC-EE and IC-CM, which imply a converse for IC-CM-EE. We show achievability for IC-CM-EE, which implies achievability for IC-EE and IC-CM. We develop the converses by relating the channel inputs of interfering users to the reliable rates of the interfered users, and by quantifying the secrecy penalty in terms of the eavesdroppers' observations. Our achievability uses structured signaling, structured cooperative jamming, channel prefixing, and asymptotic real interference alignment. While the traditional interference alignment provides some amount of secrecy by mixing unintended signals in a smaller sub-space at every receiver, in order to attain the optimum sum s.d.o.f., we incorporate structured cooperative jamming into the achievable scheme, and intricately design the structure of all of the transmitted signals jointly. Next, we study the entire s.d.o.f. regions of multi-user network structures. In this dissertation, we determine the entire s.d.o.f. regions of the K-user MAC wiretap channel and the K-user IC with secrecy constraints. The converse for the MAC follows from a middle step in the converse of the sum s.d.o.f. The converse for the IC includes constraints both due to secrecy as well as due to interference. Although the portion of the region close to the optimum sum s.d.o.f. point is governed by the upper bounds due to secrecy constraints, the other portions of the region are governed by the upper bounds due to interference constraints. Different from the existing literature, in order to fully understand the characterization of the s.d.o.f. region of the IC, one has to study the 4-user case, i.e., the 2 or 3-user cases do not illustrate the generality of the problem. In order to prove the achievability, we use the polytope structure of the converse region. In both MAC and IC cases, we develop explicit schemes that achieve the extreme points of the polytope region given by the converse. Specifically, the extreme points of the MAC region are achieved by an m-user MAC wiretap channel with (K-m) helpers, i.e., by setting (K-m) users' secure rates to zero and utilizing them as pure (structured) cooperative jammers. The extreme points of the IC region are achieved by a (K-m)-user IC with confidential messages, m helpers, and N external eavesdroppers, for m>=1 and a finite N. As a byproduct of determining the entire s.d.o.f. regions of MAC and IC channels, we show that the sum s.d.o.f. is achieved only at one extreme point of the s.d.o.f. region, which is the symmetric-rate extreme point, for both MAC and IC channel models. Then, we determine the sum s.d.o.f. of two-unicast layered wireless networks. Without any secrecy constraints, the sum d.o.f. of this class of networks was shown to take only one of three possible values: 1, 3/2 and 2, for all network configurations. We consider the setting where, in addition to being reliably transmitted, each message is required to be kept information-theoretically secure from the unintended receiver. We show that the sum s.d.o.f. can only take one of five possible values: 0, 2/3, 1, 3/2,2, for all network configurations. To determine the sum s.d.o.f., we divide the class of two-unicast layered networks into several sub-classes, and propose an achievable scheme based on the specific structure of the networks in each sub-class. Our achievable schemes are based on real interference alignment, cooperative jamming, interference neutralization and cooperative jamming neutralization techniques. Next, we consider the Gaussian wiretap channel with M helpers, where no eavesdropper channel state information (CSI) is available at the legitimate entities. One of the key ingredients of our optimal achievable scheme with perfect CSI is to align cooperative jamming signals with the information symbols at the eavesdropper to limit the information leakage rate. This requires perfect eavesdropper CSI at the transmitters. We propose a new achievable scheme in which cooperative jamming signals span the entire space of the eavesdropper, but are not exactly aligned with the information symbols. We show that this scheme achieves the same s.d.o.f. of M/(M+1) but does not require any eavesdropper CSI; the transmitters blindly cooperative jam the eavesdropper. Then, we study the separability of the parallel MAC wiretap channel. Separability, when exists, is useful as it enables us to code separately over parallel channels, and still achieve the optimum overall performance. It is well-known that the parallel single-user channel, parallel MAC and parallel BC are all separable, however, the parallel IC is not separable in general. In this dissertation, we show that, while MAC is separable MAC wiretap channel is not separable in general. We prove this via a specific linear deterministic MAC wiretap channel. We then show that even the Gaussian MAC wiretap channel is inseparable in general. Finally, we show that, when the channel gains are drawn from continuous distributions, and when the s.d.o.f. region is considered, then the Gaussian MAC wiretap channel is almost surely separable. Finally, we study the two-user one-sided IC with confidential messages. In this IC, in addition to the usual selfishness of the users, the relationship between the users is adversarial in the sense of both receivers' desires to eavesdrop on the communication of the other pair. We develop a game-theoretic model for this setting. We start with a model where each pair's payoff is their own secrecy rate. We then propose a refinement for the payoff function by explicitly accounting for the desire of the receiver to eavesdrop on the other party's communication. This payoff function captures the adversarial relationship between the users better. We determine the Nash equilibria for the binary deterministic channel for both payoff functions.

•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Secure degrees of freedom region of the Gaussian multiple access wiretap channel

Jianwei Xie, Şennur Ulukuş

The paper showed that the sum secure degrees of freedom (s.d.o.f.) of the K-user Gaussian multiple access (MAC) wiretap channel is K(K-1)/K(K-1);1. In this paper, we determine the entire s.d.o.f. region of the K-user Gaussian MAC wiretap channel. The converse follows from a middle step in the converse of [1]. The achievability follows from exploring the polytope structure of the converse region, determining its extreme points, and then showing that each extreme point can be achieved by an m-user MAC wiretap channel with K-m helpers, i.e., by setting K-m users' secure rates to zero and utilizing them as pure (structured) cooperative jammers. A byproduct of our result is that the sum s.d.o.f. is achieved only at one corner point of the s.d.o.f. region.

Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ACSSC)•Nov 1, 2013•7 citations
We show that the sum secure degrees of freedom (d.o.f.) of the K-user Gaussian multiple access (MAC) wiretap channel is K(K-1)/K(K-1)+1. Our achievability is based on real interference alignment and structured cooperative jamming. Each user divides its message into K - 1 sub-messages, and sends a linear combination of signals carrying these sub-messages together with a structured cooperative jamming signal. All cooperative jamming signals are aligned in a single dimension at the legitimate receiver allowing for reliable decoding of the message carrying signals by the legitimate receiver. Each cooperative jamming signal is aligned with K-1 message signals at the eavesdropper limiting the information leakage rate to the eavesdropper. We provide a matching converse establishing the exact sum secure d.o.f. of the Gaussian MAC wiretap channel as K(K-1)/K(K-1)+1.
We study the secure degrees of freedom (d.o.f.) of one-hop wireless networks by considering four fundamental wireless network structures: 1) Gaussian wiretap channel; 2) Gaussian broadcast channel with confidential messages; 3) Gaussian interference channel with confidential messages; and 4) Gaussian multiple access wiretap channel. The secrecy capacity of the canonical Gaussian wiretap channel does not scale with the transmit power, and hence, the secure d.o.f. of the Gaussian wiretap channel with no helpers is zero. It has been known that a strictly positive secure d.o.f. can be obtained in the Gaussian wiretap channel by using a helper, which sends structured cooperative signals. We show that the exact secure d.o.f. of the Gaussian wiretap channel with a helper is 1/2. Our achievable scheme is based on real interference alignment and cooperative jamming, which renders the message signal and the cooperative jamming signal separable at the legitimate receiver, but aligns them perfectly at the eavesdropper preventing any reliable decoding of the message signal. Our converse is based on two key lemmas. The first lemma quantifies the secrecy penalty by showing that the net effect of an eavesdropper on the system is that it eliminates one of the independent channel inputs. The second lemma quantifies the role of a helper by developing a direct relationship between the cooperative jamming signal of a helper and the message rate. We extend this result to the case of M helpers, and show that the exact secure d.o.f. in this case is M/M+1.We then generalize this approach to more general network structures with multiple messages. We show that the sum secure d.o.f. of the Gaussian broadcast channel with confidential messages and M helpers is 1, the sum secure d.o.f. of the twouser interference channel with confidential messages is 2/3, the sum secure d.o.f. of the two-user interference channel with confidential messages and M helpers is 1, and the sum secure d.o.f. of the K-user multiple access wiretap channel is K(K-1)/K(K-1)+1.
The secrecy capacity of the canonical Gaussian wiretap channel does not scale with the transmit power, and hence, the secure d.o.f. of the Gaussian wiretap channel with no helpers is zero. It has been known that a strictly positive secure d.o.f. can be obtained in the Gaussian wiretap channel by using a helper which sends structured cooperative signals. We show that the exact secure d.o.f. of the Gaussian wiretap channel with a helper is 1/2. Our achievable scheme is based on real interference alignment and cooperative jamming, which renders the message signal and the cooperative jamming signal separable at the legitimate receiver, but aligns them perfectly at the eavesdropper preventing any reliable decoding of the message signal. Our converse is based on two key lemmas. The first lemma quantifies the secrecy penalty by showing that the net effect of an eavesdropper on the system is that it eliminates one of the independent channel inputs. The second lemma quantifies the role of a helper by developing a direct relationship between the cooperative jamming signal of a helper and the message rate. We extend this result to the case of M helpers, and show that the exact secure d.o.f. in this case is M/M+1.
We revisit the recent secure degrees of freedom (s.d.o.f.) results for one-hop multiuser wireless networks by considering three fundamental wireless network structures: Gaussian wiretap channel with helpers, Gaussian multiple access wiretap channel, and Gaussian interference channel with secrecy constraints. We present main enabling tools and resulting communication schemes in an expository manner, along with key insights and design principles emerging from them. The main achievable schemes are based on real interference alignment, channel prefixing via cooperative jamming, and structured signalling. Real interference alignment enables aligning the cooperative jamming signals together with the message carrying signals at the eavesdroppers to protect them akin to one-time-pad protecting messages in wired systems. Real interference alignment also enables decodability at the legitimate receivers by rendering message carrying and cooperative jamming signals separable, and simultaneously aligning the cooperative jamming signals in the smallest possible subspace. The main converse techniques are based on two key lemmas which quantify the secrecy penalty by showing that the net effect of an eavesdropper on the system is that it eliminates one of the independent channel inputs; and the role of a helper by developing a direct relationship between the cooperative jamming signal of a helper and the message rate. These two lemmas when applied according to the unique structure of individual networks provide tight converses. Finally, we present a blind cooperative jamming scheme for the helper network with no eavesdropper channel state information at the transmitters that achieves the same optimal s.d.o.f. as in the case of full eavesdropper channel state information.
Secure Degrees of Freedom of KKK -User Gaussian Interference Channels: A Unified View
We determine the exact sum secure degrees of freedom (d.o.f.) of the K-user Gaussian interference channel. We consider three different secrecy constraints: 1) K-user interference channel with one external eavesdropper (IC-EE); 2) K-user interference channel with confidential messages (IC-CM); and 3) K-user interference channel with confidential messages and one external eavesdropper (IC-CM-EE). We show that for all of these three cases, the exact sum secure d.o.f. is K(K - 1)/(2K - 1). We show converses for IC-EE and IC-CM, which imply a converse for IC-CM-EE. We show achievability for IC-CM-EE, which implies achievability for IC-EE and IC-CM. Our converse is based on developing a direct relationship between the differential entropies of the channel inputs and the rates of the users, and quantifying the effect of eavesdropping on the rates in terms of the differential entropies of the eavesdroppers' observations. Our achievability is based on structured signaling, structured cooperative jamming, channel prefixing, and asymptotic real interference alignment. While the traditional interference alignment provides some amount of secrecy by mixing unintended signals in a smaller subspace at every receiver, in order to attain the optimum sum secure d.o.f., we incorporate structured cooperative jamming into the achievable scheme, and intricately design the structure of all of the transmitted signals jointly.
This dissertation studies the security of wireless interference networks from an information-theoretic point of view. In this setting, several transmitter-receiver pairs wish to have secure communication against the eavesdropper(s). The central goal of this dissertation is to develop a framework based on information-theoretic principles to determine the complete solutions for the signaling schemes in different wireless interference networks with large transmit powers, and derive the corresponding fundamental limits in terms of the secure degrees of freedom (s.d.o.f.). Next, we study one-hop wireless networks by considering four fundamental wireless network structures: Gaussian wiretap channel with helpers, Gaussian broadcast channel (BC) with confidential messages, Gaussian interference channel (IC) with confidential messages, and Gaussian multiple access (MAC) wiretap channel. The secrecy capacity of the canonical Gaussian wiretap channel does not scale with the transmit power, and hence, the s.d.o.f. of the Gaussian wiretap channel with no helpers is zero. We show that the exact s.d.o.f. of the Gaussian wiretap channel with a helper is 1/2. Our achievable scheme is based on real interference alignment and cooperative jamming, which renders the message signal and the cooperative jamming signal separable at the legitimate receiver, but aligns them perfectly at the eavesdropper preventing any reliable decoding of the message signal. Our converse is based on two key lemmas. The first lemma quantifies the secrecy penalty by showing that the net effect of an eavesdropper on the system is that it eliminates one of the independent channel inputs. The second lemma quantifies the role of a helper by developing a direct relationship between the cooperative jamming signal of a helper and the message rate. We extend this result to the case of M helpers, and show that the exact s.d.o.f. in this case is M/(M+1). We then generalize this approach to more general network structures with multiple messages. We show that the sum s.d.o.f. of the Gaussian BC with confidential messages and M helpers is 1, the sum s.d.o.f. of the two-user IC with confidential messages is 2/3, the sum s.d.o.f. of the two-user IC with confidential messages and M helpers is 1, and the sum s.d.o.f. of the K-user MAC wiretap channel is K(K-1)/(K(K-1)+1). Then, we study the sum s.d.o.f. of multi-receiver networks. In this dissertation, we determine the exact sum s.d.o.f. of the K-user Gaussian IC. We consider three different secrecy constraints: 1) K-user IC with one external eavesdropper (IC-EE), 2) K-user IC with confidential messages (IC-CM), and 3) K-user IC with confidential messages and one external eavesdropper (IC-CM-EE). We show that for all of these three cases, the exact sum secure d.o.f. is K(K-1)/(2K-1). We show converses for IC-EE and IC-CM, which imply a converse for IC-CM-EE. We show achievability for IC-CM-EE, which implies achievability for IC-EE and IC-CM. We develop the converses by relating the channel inputs of interfering users to the reliable rates of the interfered users, and by quantifying the secrecy penalty in terms of the eavesdroppers' observations. Our achievability uses structured signaling, structured cooperative jamming, channel prefixing, and asymptotic real interference alignment. While the traditional interference alignment provides some amount of secrecy by mixing unintended signals in a smaller sub-space at every receiver, in order to attain the optimum sum s.d.o.f., we incorporate structured cooperative jamming into the achievable scheme, and intricately design the structure of all of the transmitted signals jointly. Next, we study the entire s.d.o.f. regions of multi-user network structures. In this dissertation, we determine the entire s.d.o.f. regions of the K-user MAC wiretap channel and the K-user IC with secrecy constraints. The converse for the MAC follows from a middle step in the converse of the sum s.d.o.f. The converse for the IC includes constraints both due to secrecy as well as due to interference. Although the portion of the region close to the optimum sum s.d.o.f. point is governed by the upper bounds due to secrecy constraints, the other portions of the region are governed by the upper bounds due to interference constraints. Different from the existing literature, in order to fully understand the characterization of the s.d.o.f. region of the IC, one has to study the 4-user case, i.e., the 2 or 3-user cases do not illustrate the generality of the problem. In order to prove the achievability, we use the polytope structure of the converse region. In both MAC and IC cases, we develop explicit schemes that achieve the extreme points of the polytope region given by the converse. Specifically, the extreme points of the MAC region are achieved by an m-user MAC wiretap channel with (K-m) helpers, i.e., by setting (K-m) users' secure rates to zero and utilizing them as pure (structured) cooperative jammers. The extreme points of the IC region are achieved by a (K-m)-user IC with confidential messages, m helpers, and N external eavesdroppers, for m>=1 and a finite N. As a byproduct of determining the entire s.d.o.f. regions of MAC and IC channels, we show that the sum s.d.o.f. is achieved only at one extreme point of the s.d.o.f. region, which is the symmetric-rate extreme point, for both MAC and IC channel models. Then, we determine the sum s.d.o.f. of two-unicast layered wireless networks. Without any secrecy constraints, the sum d.o.f. of this class of networks was shown to take only one of three possible values: 1, 3/2 and 2, for all network configurations. We consider the setting where, in addition to being reliably transmitted, each message is required to be kept information-theoretically secure from the unintended receiver. We show that the sum s.d.o.f. can only take one of five possible values: 0, 2/3, 1, 3/2,2, for all network configurations. To determine the sum s.d.o.f., we divide the class of two-unicast layered networks into several sub-classes, and propose an achievable scheme based on the specific structure of the networks in each sub-class. Our achievable schemes are based on real interference alignment, cooperative jamming, interference neutralization and cooperative jamming neutralization techniques. Next, we consider the Gaussian wiretap channel with M helpers, where no eavesdropper channel state information (CSI) is available at the legitimate entities. One of the key ingredients of our optimal achievable scheme with perfect CSI is to align cooperative jamming signals with the information symbols at the eavesdropper to limit the information leakage rate. This requires perfect eavesdropper CSI at the transmitters. We propose a new achievable scheme in which cooperative jamming signals span the entire space of the eavesdropper, but are not exactly aligned with the information symbols. We show that this scheme achieves the same s.d.o.f. of M/(M+1) but does not require any eavesdropper CSI; the transmitters blindly cooperative jam the eavesdropper. Then, we study the separability of the parallel MAC wiretap channel. Separability, when exists, is useful as it enables us to code separately over parallel channels, and still achieve the optimum overall performance. It is well-known that the parallel single-user channel, parallel MAC and parallel BC are all separable, however, the parallel IC is not separable in general. In this dissertation, we show that, while MAC is separable MAC wiretap channel is not separable in general. We prove this via a specific linear deterministic MAC wiretap channel. We then show that even the Gaussian MAC wiretap channel is inseparable in general. Finally, we show that, when the channel gains are drawn from continuous distributions, and when the s.d.o.f. region is considered, then the Gaussian MAC wiretap channel is almost surely separable. Finally, we study the two-user one-sided IC with confidential messages. In this IC, in addition to the usual selfishness of the users, the relationship between the users is adversarial in the sense of both receivers' desires to eavesdrop on the communication of the other pair. We develop a game-theoretic model for this setting. We start with a model where each pair's payoff is their own secrecy rate. We then propose a refinement for the payoff function by explicitly accounting for the desire of the receiver to eavesdrop on the other party's communication. This payoff function captures the adversarial relationship between the users better. We determine the Nash equilibria for the binary deterministic channel for both payoff functions.
The paper showed that the sum secure degrees of freedom (s.d.o.f.) of the K-user Gaussian multiple access (MAC) wiretap channel is K(K-1)/K(K-1);1. In this paper, we determine the entire s.d.o.f. region of the K-user Gaussian MAC wiretap channel. The converse follows from a middle step in the converse of [1]. The achievability follows from exploring the polytope structure of the converse region, determining its extreme points, and then showing that each extreme point can be achieved by an m-user MAC wiretap channel with K-m helpers, i.e., by setting K-m users' secure rates to zero and utilizing them as pure (structured) cooperative jammers. A byproduct of our result is that the sum s.d.o.f. is achieved only at one corner point of the s.d.o.f. region.