Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics of the Solid State

Necessary and sufficient conditions for the presence of global potentials in space

A. N. Ageev, A. G. Chirkov

Published Jul 1, 2007• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

It is shown that either the presence of a magnetic flux in a finite spatial region or jumps in the field strength are necessary to generate a global potential. The problem of detecting the magnetic Aharonov—Bohm effect is discussed.
DOI
10.1134/s1063783407070141

Related papers

Is the Aharonov–Bohm effect local?

Richard Healey

Introduction Aharonov and Bohm (1959) drew attention to the quantum mechanical prediction that an interference pattern due to a beam of charged particles could be produced or altered by the presence of a constant magnetic field in a region from which the particles were excluded. This effect was first experimentally detected by Chambers (1960), and since then has been repeatedly and more convincingly demonstrated in a series of experiments including the elegant experiments of Tonomura et al. (1986). At first sight, the Aharonov-Bohm effect seems to manifest nonlocality. It seems clear that the (electro)magnetic field acts on the particles since it affects the interference pattern they produce; and this must be action at a distance since the particles pass through a region from which that field is absent. Now it is commonly believed that this appearance of nonlocality can be removed by taking it to be the electromagnetic potential A μ rather than the field F μν that acts locally on the particles: indeed, Bohm and Aharonov themselves took the effect to demonstrate the independent reality of the (electro)magnetic potential. But the nonlocality is real, not apparent, and cannot be removed simply by invoking the electromagnetic potential. While there may indeed be more to electromagnetism than can be represented just by the values of F μν at all space-time points, acknowledging this fact still does not permit a completely local account of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 18, 1999•4 citations

Condition for Nonexistence of Aharonov-Bohm Effect

Shasanka Mohan Roy

It is shown that electromagnetic effects of a vector potential on a charged particle confined to a region $R$ (multiply or simply connected) are completely determined by field strengths in $R$, if the potential obeys certain conditions. Such potentials are adequate in experiments purporting to show Aharonov-Bohm effect. Therefore these experiments have not established effects of inaccessible fields.

Physical Review Letters•Jan 21, 1980•91 citations

Role of the nonlocality of the vector potential in the Aharonov–Bohm effect

A.M. Stewart

When the electromagnetic potentials are expressed in the Coulomb gauge in terms of the electric and magnetic fields rather than the sources responsible for these fields they have a simple form that is nonlocal (i.e., the potentials depend on the fields at every point in space). It is this nonlocality of classical electrodynamics that is primarily responsible for the puzzle associated with the static Aharonov–Bohm effect: that its interference pattern is affected by fields in a region of space that the electron beam never enters.

arXiv:1209.2050•Canadian Journal of Physics•Apr 16, 2013•12 citations

The electric Aharonov-Bohm effect

Ricardo Weder

The seminal paper of Aharonov and Bohm [Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959)]10.1103/PhysRev.115.485 is at the origin of a very extensive literature in some of the more fundamental issues in physics. They claimed that electromagnetic fields can act at a distance on charged particles even if they are identically zero in the region of space where the particles propagate, that the fundamental electromagnetic quantities in quantum physics are not only the electromagnetic fields but also the circulations of the electromagnetic potentials; what gives them a real physical significance. They proposed two experiments to verify their theoretical conclusions. The magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect, where an electron is influenced by a magnetic field that is zero in the region of space accessible to the electron, and the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect where an electron is affected by a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in the region where the electron is propagating, i.e., such that the electric field vanishes along its trajectory. The Aharonov-Bohm effects imply such a strong departure from the physical intuition coming from classical physics that it is no wonder that they remain a highly controversial issue after more than fifty years, in spite of the fact that they are discussed in most of the text books in quantum mechanics. The magnetic case has been studied extensively. The experimental issues were settled by the remarkable experiments of Tonomura et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1443 (1982); Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 792 (1986)] with toroidal magnets, that gave a strong evidence of the existence of the effect, and by the recent experiment of Caprez et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 210401 (2007)]10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.210401 that shows that the results of the Tonomura et al. experiments cannot be explained by the action of a force. The theoretical issues were settled by Ballesteros and Weder [Commun. Math. Phys. 285, 345 (2009)10.1007/s00220-008-0579-1; J. Math. Phys. 50, 122108 (2009)10.1063/1.3266176; Commun. Math. Phys. 303, 175 (2011)]10.1007/s00220-010-1166-9 who rigorously proved that quantum mechanics predicts the experimental results of Tonomura et al. and of Caprez et al. The electric Aharonov-Bohm effect has been much less studied. Actually, its existence, that has not been confirmed experimentally, is a very controversial issue. In their 1959 paper Aharonov and Bohm proposed an ansatz for the solution to the Schrödinger equation in regions where there is a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in space. It consists in multiplying the free evolution by a phase given by the integral in time of the potential. The validity of this ansatz predicts interference fringes between parts of a coherent electron beam that are subjected to different potentials. In this paper we prove that the exact solution to the Schrödinger equation is given by the Aharonov-Bohm ansatz up to an error bound in norm that is uniform in time and that decays as a constant divided by the velocity. Our results give, for the first time, a rigorous proof that quantum mechanics predicts the existence of the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect, under conditions that we provide. We hope that our results will stimulate the experimental research on the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect.

arXiv:1006.1385•Journal of Mathematical Physics•May 1, 2011•16 citations

Classical analysis of the Aharonov-Bohm effect

E. Ley‐Koo, G. Villa‐Torres

This work presents an analysis of the Aharonov-Bohm effect taking into account both regions where the electron is present and where it is excluded, and also the time variations of the magnetic vector potential and the magnetic induction field as they change between two of their stationary values. This analysis allows the identification of the electrical force field induced in the region where the electron is present by the time variation of the magnetic flux in the region where the electron is excluded, thus providing a classical explanation of the changes in the stationary properties of the electron when the magnetic potential and field change from one set of stationary values to another. Some apparent contradictions in attempts to interpret the A-B effect are also discussed and clarified.

Revista Mexicana de Física•Jan 1, 2001•1 citation

Verification of the Aharonov-Bohm effect in superconductors by use of a toroidal flux geometry

I. R. Walker

Predictions made by Aharonov and Bohm concerning the effects of electromagnetic potentials on electrons in field-free regions of space, have been demonstrated in superconductors with the use of the flux produced by a very fine toroidal solenoid. The use of a toroidal geometry sidesteps the objections raised by Roy concerning the use of sources of flux with linear geometries. The use of superconductors excludes the possibility that stray electrons can pass through the flux-filled region of space to produce the observed phenomena.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Apr 1, 1986•2 citations
Introduction Aharonov and Bohm (1959) drew attention to the quantum mechanical prediction that an interference pattern due to a beam of charged particles could be produced or altered by the presence of a constant magnetic field in a region from which the particles were excluded. This effect was first experimentally detected by Chambers (1960), and since then has been repeatedly and more convincingly demonstrated in a series of experiments including the elegant experiments of Tonomura et al. (1986). At first sight, the Aharonov-Bohm effect seems to manifest nonlocality. It seems clear that the (electro)magnetic field acts on the particles since it affects the interference pattern they produce; and this must be action at a distance since the particles pass through a region from which that field is absent. Now it is commonly believed that this appearance of nonlocality can be removed by taking it to be the electromagnetic potential A μ rather than the field F μν that acts locally on the particles: indeed, Bohm and Aharonov themselves took the effect to demonstrate the independent reality of the (electro)magnetic potential. But the nonlocality is real, not apparent, and cannot be removed simply by invoking the electromagnetic potential. While there may indeed be more to electromagnetism than can be represented just by the values of F μν at all space-time points, acknowledging this fact still does not permit a completely local account of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.
It is shown that electromagnetic effects of a vector potential on a charged particle confined to a region RRR (multiply or simply connected) are completely determined by field strengths in RRR, if the potential obeys certain conditions. Such potentials are adequate in experiments purporting to show Aharonov-Bohm effect. Therefore these experiments have not established effects of inaccessible fields.
When the electromagnetic potentials are expressed in the Coulomb gauge in terms of the electric and magnetic fields rather than the sources responsible for these fields they have a simple form that is nonlocal (i.e., the potentials depend on the fields at every point in space). It is this nonlocality of classical electrodynamics that is primarily responsible for the puzzle associated with the static Aharonov–Bohm effect: that its interference pattern is affected by fields in a region of space that the electron beam never enters.
The seminal paper of Aharonov and Bohm [Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959)]10.1103/PhysRev.115.485 is at the origin of a very extensive literature in some of the more fundamental issues in physics. They claimed that electromagnetic fields can act at a distance on charged particles even if they are identically zero in the region of space where the particles propagate, that the fundamental electromagnetic quantities in quantum physics are not only the electromagnetic fields but also the circulations of the electromagnetic potentials; what gives them a real physical significance. They proposed two experiments to verify their theoretical conclusions. The magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect, where an electron is influenced by a magnetic field that is zero in the region of space accessible to the electron, and the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect where an electron is affected by a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in the region where the electron is propagating, i.e., such that the electric field vanishes along its trajectory. The Aharonov-Bohm effects imply such a strong departure from the physical intuition coming from classical physics that it is no wonder that they remain a highly controversial issue after more than fifty years, in spite of the fact that they are discussed in most of the text books in quantum mechanics. The magnetic case has been studied extensively. The experimental issues were settled by the remarkable experiments of Tonomura et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1443 (1982); Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 792 (1986)] with toroidal magnets, that gave a strong evidence of the existence of the effect, and by the recent experiment of Caprez et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 210401 (2007)]10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.210401 that shows that the results of the Tonomura et al. experiments cannot be explained by the action of a force. The theoretical issues were settled by Ballesteros and Weder [Commun. Math. Phys. 285, 345 (2009)10.1007/s00220-008-0579-1; J. Math. Phys. 50, 122108 (2009)10.1063/1.3266176; Commun. Math. Phys. 303, 175 (2011)]10.1007/s00220-010-1166-9 who rigorously proved that quantum mechanics predicts the experimental results of Tonomura et al. and of Caprez et al. The electric Aharonov-Bohm effect has been much less studied. Actually, its existence, that has not been confirmed experimentally, is a very controversial issue. In their 1959 paper Aharonov and Bohm proposed an ansatz for the solution to the Schrödinger equation in regions where there is a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in space. It consists in multiplying the free evolution by a phase given by the integral in time of the potential. The validity of this ansatz predicts interference fringes between parts of a coherent electron beam that are subjected to different potentials. In this paper we prove that the exact solution to the Schrödinger equation is given by the Aharonov-Bohm ansatz up to an error bound in norm that is uniform in time and that decays as a constant divided by the velocity. Our results give, for the first time, a rigorous proof that quantum mechanics predicts the existence of the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect, under conditions that we provide. We hope that our results will stimulate the experimental research on the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect.
This work presents an analysis of the Aharonov-Bohm effect taking into account both regions where the electron is present and where it is excluded, and also the time variations of the magnetic vector potential and the magnetic induction field as they change between two of their stationary values. This analysis allows the identification of the electrical force field induced in the region where the electron is present by the time variation of the magnetic flux in the region where the electron is excluded, thus providing a classical explanation of the changes in the stationary properties of the electron when the magnetic potential and field change from one set of stationary values to another. Some apparent contradictions in attempts to interpret the A-B effect are also discussed and clarified.
Predictions made by Aharonov and Bohm concerning the effects of electromagnetic potentials on electrons in field-free regions of space, have been demonstrated in superconductors with the use of the flux produced by a very fine toroidal solenoid. The use of a toroidal geometry sidesteps the objections raised by Roy concerning the use of sources of flux with linear geometries. The use of superconductors excludes the possibility that stray electrons can pass through the flux-filled region of space to produce the observed phenomena.