Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Today

Go and catch a falling neutron…

Gloria B. Lubkin

Published Aug 1, 1975• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A team of experimenters has used a neutron interferometer to observe the quantum-mechanical phase shift of neutrons caused by their interaction with the Earth's gravitational field. The experiment is one of the first (if not the first) observations of the principle of equivalence for a quantum-mechanical system. The experimenters, who reported their work in Phys. Rev. Letters on 9 June, are Roberto Colella and Albert W. Overhauser (Purdue University) and Samuel A. Werner (Ford Motor Company).

DOI
10.1063/1.3069105

Related papers

Neutron Interferometry: Lessons in Experimental Quantum Mechanics

H Rauch and S Werner

The first successful operation of a perfect crystal neutron interferometer by Rauch, Treimer and Bonse (1974) in Vienna opened up new vistas; intricate quantum mechanical concepts that could only be dealt with in thought experiments during the Einstein-Bohr era, now became accessible to direct tests in the laboratory. In the following decade, Helmut Rauch and co-workers implemented interferometric verifications of 4π spinor symmetry, up-down spin superposition and stochastic versus deterministic absorption. On the other side of the Atlantic, Colella, Overhauser and Werner (COW 1975) made the first observation of a quantal phase produced by the weak force of gravity. Samuel Werner and co-workers proceeded to observe the Sagnac, AC and scalar AB effects. The field proliferated and became the subject matter of several conferences and review articles. A book on the topic, however, was not yet available. The two stalwarts, Rauch and Werner, have now spent four painstaking years writing Neutron Interferometry: Lessons in Experimental Quantum Mechanics, a `yearbook' comprising 365 pages of documentation followed by a 25-page reference list. The book presents this advanced subject from the experimenter's viewpoint, in keeping with the latter half of its title, at an elementary level suitable for graduate students. For teachers and researchers, the book should serve as a ready-reference reckoner for the broad range of topics covered. The book begins by bringing out the analogy between neutron optics and photon optics, illustrated with results of milestone neutron experiments. It surveys various types of neutron interferometers, providing details of perfect crystal interferometer set-ups at ILL, MURR and NIST. All known interactions of the neutron are succinctly reviewed and their observations described. Coherence properties of neutron beams are characterized in the light of partial beam detection and post-selection experiments. An in-depth portrayal of Rauch and Werner's own experiments, whether verifying counterintuitive quantal phenomena such as the up-down spin superposition, the AC and scalar AB effects or observing phases originating from the Earth's gravitation and rotation and from longitudinal and transverse motion of the medium, is made with insight. The first experimental separation of geometric and dynamical phases as well as the observation of noncyclic phases and amplitudes are briefly touched upon. The book provides a gist of interferometric tests of quantum features ranging from linearity of the Schrodinger equation to Bell nonlocality. Applications to condensed matter physics, neutron diffraction in single crystals and various interpretations of quantum mechanics are also described. Numerous references to related fields, e.g. atom interferometry, nuclear physics, general relativity and geometric phase, have been cited for the interested reader. It is a pity that such a beautiful book is not free of blemishes. The book credits the Vienna group (1997) with a direct polarimetric(!) verification of Pauli anticommutation (p 75), though polarimetry is incapable of sensing a π phase shift implied by anticommutation. Rauch and Werner persist with the Vienna group's incorrect claims on geometric phase, made in 1990 (p 206), 1994 (pp 186, 203) and 1996 (p 15, pp 206-10). The list of neutron interferometry experiments (p 15) is known within the interference community as the USA [Uncle Sam (Werner)'s Ad]. While incorrectly including the Vienna-Berlin (1996) work as a `topological phase' observation, the list leaves out several landmark achievements of neutron interferometry. The first direct verification of Pauli anticommutation (1997) and the first observation of Pancharatnam amplitudes and phases in noncyclic evolutions (1998) are just two of the glaring omissions. The 1993 erratum (Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 250) to the Missouri-Melbourne (1992) paper (p 194) on the scalar AB effect is conspicuous by its absence. The book cites a 1999 criticism (p 204) of the neutron interferometric observation of noncyclic phases, but turns a Nelson's eye to the accompanying reply (Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 2090 (1999)). Incidentally, the experiment was performed with polarized neutrons - as it ought to be - and not unpolarized neutrons, as the book states. Overhauser and Colella's classic 1974 paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 1237) - a precursor to the COW (1975) experiment proper - gets disposed of in three words (p 211) and vanishes mysteriously from the list of references. The invocation of the `Feynman-Dirac prescription' (p 215) is inappropriate. The most serious `lapse' appears in Section 8.12 (pp 268-74). Wagh and Rakhecha 1997 (p 273) were the first to derive the exact spinor evolution for polarized neutrons accelerating in uniform electric and magnetic fields, and to disprove the conclusion of Casella and Werner 1992 (p 269). Rauch and Werner's book omits to acknowledge this fact and offers `its own' explanation of the phenomenon in Figs 8.6 and 8.7, based on ideas borrowed directly from Figs 4 and 2 respectively in Wagh and Rakhecha (1997). Barring such lapses, and a number of typographical errors*, Rauch and Werner have completed their Herculean task admirably to come up with this comprehensive sourcebook on neutron interferometry and its contributions to the epistemological understanding of the quantum world. The Oxford University Press has produced the book with its customary high-quality standards. The book has a smart appearance and an attractive front cover, adorned by a famous New Yorker cartoon depicting a skizzical quantal sojourn past a tree. I have no hesitation in recommending Neutron Interferometry as a must-read book to young and old physicists and philosophers hailing from a wide spectrum of disciplines. The book has already occupied pride of place on the shelf of every practitioner of neutron interferometry. So happy reading, experimenters and theoreticians - and happier interfering! Apoorva G Wagh *Use of the symbol δ to represent a partial differential (pp 2, 21), the incorrect sign for a power of 10 in Table 1.2 (p 3), a value close to unity cited for 1 - n (p 8), the word charge(s) misprinted as `change(s)' (p 193) and missing exponents ½ and 2 in Eqs (7.49) and (7.51) respectively (p 242) provide a random sample of the typographical errors in the book.

Measurement Science and Technology•Feb 16, 2001•83 citations

Observation of Gravitationally Induced Quantum Interference

R. Colella, A. W. Overhauser, S. A. Werner

We have used a neutron interferometer to observe the quantum-mechanical phase shift of neutrons caused by their interaction with Earth's gravitational field.Received 14 April 1975DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.34.1472©1975 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jun 9, 1975•1,054 citations

Two-wavelength-difference measurement of gravitationally induced quantum interference phases

Kenneth C. Littrell, Brendan E. Allman, S. Werner

One of the significant successes in the field of neutron interferometry has been the experimental observation of the phase shift of a neutron de Broglie wave due to the action of the Earth's gravitational field. Past experiments have clearly demonstrated the effect and verified the quantum-mechanical equivalence of gravitational and inertial masses to a precision of about 1%. In this experiment the gravitationally induced phase shift of the neutron is measured with a statistical uncertainty of order 1 part in 1000 in two different interferometers. Nearly harmonic pairs of neutron wavelengths are used to measure and compensate for effects due to the distortion of the interferometer as it is tilted about the incident beam direction. A discrepancy between the theoretically predicted and experimentally measured values of the phase shift due to gravity is observed at the 1% level. Extensions to the theoretical description of the shape of a neutron interferogram as a function of tilt in a gravitational field are discussed and compared with experiment.

Physical Review A•Sep 1, 1997•117 citations

Classical underpinnings of gravitationally induced quantum interference

Philip D. Mannheim

We show that the gravitational modification of the phase of a neutron beam [the Colella-Overhauser-Werner (COW) experiment] has a classical origin, being due to the time delay that classical particles experience in traversing a background gravitational field. Similarly, we show that classical light waves also undergo a phase shift in traversing a gravitational field. We show that the COW experiment respects the equivalence principle even in the presence of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:gr-qc/9611037•Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1998•21 citations

Neutrons and gravity

Валерий Викторович Несвижевский

Neutrons not only fall classically in the gravitational field of the Earth as potatoes and other normal objects do; at certain conditions, they reveal quantum behavior, or even form well­ defined gravitational quantum states. Due to the relative simplicity of quantum mechanical rules for solving this problem, we could predict analytically the motion of a neutron in a grav­ itational field in the vicinity of a reflecting surface. Such a bouncing neutron can have only certain, discrete values of energy. These extremely small energy values turn out to be very sensitive probes to the presence of even tiny extra interactions, in particular those between the neutron and the mirror. Moreover, several emerging fields of research profit from experi­ ence and knowledge gained in the recent experimental observation of gravitational quantum states of ultracold neutrons, and extend the developed methods to atoms and anti-atoms, to whispering-gallery effect and other domains, thus providing more and more application for the method. Quantum bouncing particles could play their role in quantum tests of the equivalence principle, in explorations of gravitational properties of antimatter, in searching for new funda­ mental short-range and other interactions beyond the Standard Model of particle physics, in surface and thin-layer physics, in chemistry, and so on. In this short note we mention results of a few previous years and project nearest developments ..

•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

The neutron interferometer as a device for illustrating the strange behavior of quantum systems

Daniel M. Greenberger

The neutron interferometer is a unique instrument that allows one to construct a neutron wave packet of macroscopic size, divide it into two components separated by centimeters, and then coherently recombine them. A number of experiments clearly showing the difference between quantum and classical theory have been performed with it, which are suitable for presentation in elementary quantum courses. This article presents a simple mathematical model of the interferometer, which can be used to illustrate clearly many of the surprising features of quantum systems. For example, one can describe an experiment to determine which component beam the neutron takes (an analog of the two-slit electron experiment). One can then trace in detail the loss of coherence of the wave function, rather than merely invoke the usual "handwaving" uncertainty arguments. The author discusses the effect of gravity on the neutron beam [the classic COW (Colella, Overhauser, and Werner) experiment], including a simple analysis in an accelerated reference frame, and its relation to the equivalence principle, the red shift, and the twin paradox. Also described are the effect of rotation of the neutron by 360\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{} to change its phase, the effect on the wave function of measuring the absence of the particle from a beam ("Dicke's paradox"), and a realizable version of Wheeler's "delayed-choice" experiments, as well as their relation to the problem of "Schr\"odinger's cat." The treatment is suitable for bright undergraduates and first-year graduate students.

Reviews of Modern Physics•Oct 1, 1983•144 citations
A team of experimenters has used a neutron interferometer to observe the quantum-mechanical phase shift of neutrons caused by their interaction with the Earth's gravitational field. The experiment is one of the first (if not the first) observations of the principle of equivalence for a quantum-mechanical system. The experimenters, who reported their work in Phys. Rev. Letters on 9 June, are Roberto Colella and Albert W. Overhauser (Purdue University) and Samuel A. Werner (Ford Motor Company).
The first successful operation of a perfect crystal neutron interferometer by Rauch, Treimer and Bonse (1974) in Vienna opened up new vistas; intricate quantum mechanical concepts that could only be dealt with in thought experiments during the Einstein-Bohr era, now became accessible to direct tests in the laboratory. In the following decade, Helmut Rauch and co-workers implemented interferometric verifications of 4π spinor symmetry, up-down spin superposition and stochastic versus deterministic absorption. On the other side of the Atlantic, Colella, Overhauser and Werner (COW 1975) made the first observation of a quantal phase produced by the weak force of gravity. Samuel Werner and co-workers proceeded to observe the Sagnac, AC and scalar AB effects. The field proliferated and became the subject matter of several conferences and review articles. A book on the topic, however, was not yet available. The two stalwarts, Rauch and Werner, have now spent four painstaking years writing Neutron Interferometry: Lessons in Experimental Quantum Mechanics, a `yearbook' comprising 365 pages of documentation followed by a 25-page reference list. The book presents this advanced subject from the experimenter's viewpoint, in keeping with the latter half of its title, at an elementary level suitable for graduate students. For teachers and researchers, the book should serve as a ready-reference reckoner for the broad range of topics covered. The book begins by bringing out the analogy between neutron optics and photon optics, illustrated with results of milestone neutron experiments. It surveys various types of neutron interferometers, providing details of perfect crystal interferometer set-ups at ILL, MURR and NIST. All known interactions of the neutron are succinctly reviewed and their observations described. Coherence properties of neutron beams are characterized in the light of partial beam detection and post-selection experiments. An in-depth portrayal of Rauch and Werner's own experiments, whether verifying counterintuitive quantal phenomena such as the up-down spin superposition, the AC and scalar AB effects or observing phases originating from the Earth's gravitation and rotation and from longitudinal and transverse motion of the medium, is made with insight. The first experimental separation of geometric and dynamical phases as well as the observation of noncyclic phases and amplitudes are briefly touched upon. The book provides a gist of interferometric tests of quantum features ranging from linearity of the Schrodinger equation to Bell nonlocality. Applications to condensed matter physics, neutron diffraction in single crystals and various interpretations of quantum mechanics are also described. Numerous references to related fields, e.g. atom interferometry, nuclear physics, general relativity and geometric phase, have been cited for the interested reader. It is a pity that such a beautiful book is not free of blemishes. The book credits the Vienna group (1997) with a direct polarimetric(!) verification of Pauli anticommutation (p 75), though polarimetry is incapable of sensing a π phase shift implied by anticommutation. Rauch and Werner persist with the Vienna group's incorrect claims on geometric phase, made in 1990 (p 206), 1994 (pp 186, 203) and 1996 (p 15, pp 206-10). The list of neutron interferometry experiments (p 15) is known within the interference community as the USA [Uncle Sam (Werner)'s Ad]. While incorrectly including the Vienna-Berlin (1996) work as a `topological phase' observation, the list leaves out several landmark achievements of neutron interferometry. The first direct verification of Pauli anticommutation (1997) and the first observation of Pancharatnam amplitudes and phases in noncyclic evolutions (1998) are just two of the glaring omissions. The 1993 erratum (Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 250) to the Missouri-Melbourne (1992) paper (p 194) on the scalar AB effect is conspicuous by its absence. The book cites a 1999 criticism (p 204) of the neutron interferometric observation of noncyclic phases, but turns a Nelson's eye to the accompanying reply (Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 2090 (1999)). Incidentally, the experiment was performed with polarized neutrons - as it ought to be - and not unpolarized neutrons, as the book states. Overhauser and Colella's classic 1974 paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 1237) - a precursor to the COW (1975) experiment proper - gets disposed of in three words (p 211) and vanishes mysteriously from the list of references. The invocation of the `Feynman-Dirac prescription' (p 215) is inappropriate. The most serious `lapse' appears in Section 8.12 (pp 268-74). Wagh and Rakhecha 1997 (p 273) were the first to derive the exact spinor evolution for polarized neutrons accelerating in uniform electric and magnetic fields, and to disprove the conclusion of Casella and Werner 1992 (p 269). Rauch and Werner's book omits to acknowledge this fact and offers `its own' explanation of the phenomenon in Figs 8.6 and 8.7, based on ideas borrowed directly from Figs 4 and 2 respectively in Wagh and Rakhecha (1997). Barring such lapses, and a number of typographical errors*, Rauch and Werner have completed their Herculean task admirably to come up with this comprehensive sourcebook on neutron interferometry and its contributions to the epistemological understanding of the quantum world. The Oxford University Press has produced the book with its customary high-quality standards. The book has a smart appearance and an attractive front cover, adorned by a famous New Yorker cartoon depicting a skizzical quantal sojourn past a tree. I have no hesitation in recommending Neutron Interferometry as a must-read book to young and old physicists and philosophers hailing from a wide spectrum of disciplines. The book has already occupied pride of place on the shelf of every practitioner of neutron interferometry. So happy reading, experimenters and theoreticians - and happier interfering! Apoorva G Wagh *Use of the symbol δ to represent a partial differential (pp 2, 21), the incorrect sign for a power of 10 in Table 1.2 (p 3), a value close to unity cited for 1 - n (p 8), the word charge(s) misprinted as `change(s)' (p 193) and missing exponents ½ and 2 in Eqs (7.49) and (7.51) respectively (p 242) provide a random sample of the typographical errors in the book.
One of the significant successes in the field of neutron interferometry has been the experimental observation of the phase shift of a neutron de Broglie wave due to the action of the Earth's gravitational field. Past experiments have clearly demonstrated the effect and verified the quantum-mechanical equivalence of gravitational and inertial masses to a precision of about 1%. In this experiment the gravitationally induced phase shift of the neutron is measured with a statistical uncertainty of order 1 part in 1000 in two different interferometers. Nearly harmonic pairs of neutron wavelengths are used to measure and compensate for effects due to the distortion of the interferometer as it is tilted about the incident beam direction. A discrepancy between the theoretically predicted and experimentally measured values of the phase shift due to gravity is observed at the 1% level. Extensions to the theoretical description of the shape of a neutron interferogram as a function of tilt in a gravitational field are discussed and compared with experiment.
Neutrons not only fall classically in the gravitational field of the Earth as potatoes and other normal objects do; at certain conditions, they reveal quantum behavior, or even form well­ defined gravitational quantum states. Due to the relative simplicity of quantum mechanical rules for solving this problem, we could predict analytically the motion of a neutron in a grav­ itational field in the vicinity of a reflecting surface. Such a bouncing neutron can have only certain, discrete values of energy. These extremely small energy values turn out to be very sensitive probes to the presence of even tiny extra interactions, in particular those between the neutron and the mirror. Moreover, several emerging fields of research profit from experi­ ence and knowledge gained in the recent experimental observation of gravitational quantum states of ultracold neutrons, and extend the developed methods to atoms and anti-atoms, to whispering-gallery effect and other domains, thus providing more and more application for the method. Quantum bouncing particles could play their role in quantum tests of the equivalence principle, in explorations of gravitational properties of antimatter, in searching for new funda­ mental short-range and other interactions beyond the Standard Model of particle physics, in surface and thin-layer physics, in chemistry, and so on. In this short note we mention results of a few previous years and project nearest developments ..
The neutron interferometer is a unique instrument that allows one to construct a neutron wave packet of macroscopic size, divide it into two components separated by centimeters, and then coherently recombine them. A number of experiments clearly showing the difference between quantum and classical theory have been performed with it, which are suitable for presentation in elementary quantum courses. This article presents a simple mathematical model of the interferometer, which can be used to illustrate clearly many of the surprising features of quantum systems. For example, one can describe an experiment to determine which component beam the neutron takes (an analog of the two-slit electron experiment). One can then trace in detail the loss of coherence of the wave function, rather than merely invoke the usual "handwaving" uncertainty arguments. The author discusses the effect of gravity on the neutron beam [the classic COW (Colella, Overhauser, and Werner) experiment], including a simple analysis in an accelerated reference frame, and its relation to the equivalence principle, the red shift, and the twin paradox. Also described are the effect of rotation of the neutron by 360\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{} to change its phase, the effect on the wave function of measuring the absence of the particle from a beam ("Dicke's paradox"), and a realizable version of Wheeler's "delayed-choice" experiments, as well as their relation to the problem of "Schr\"odinger's cat." The treatment is suitable for bright undergraduates and first-year graduate students.