Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Progress in optics

V Fluctuations of Light Beams

L. Mandeļ

Published Jan 1, 1963• 118 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0079-6638(08)70560-2

Related papers

On the classical fluctuation of a beam of light

Lajos Jánossy

Il Nuovo Cimento•Jul 1, 1957•32 citations

Quantum Fluctuations in Light Beams

Claude Fabre

•Jan 1, 1997•14 citations

Polarization fluctuations in stationary light beams

Andriy Shevchenko, Tero Setälä, M. Kaivola +1 more

Revista cubana de física•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Fluctuation of photoelectrons and intensity correlation of light beams

S. K. Srinivasan, Ramabhadra Vasudevan

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Feb 1, 1967•8 citations

Twin beams point to hypersensitive detection

E. Giacobino

In recent years physicists have had significant success in manipulating the quantum fluctuations of light, which originate in Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. They have produced squeezed light, that is light with reduced noise in its intensity or in its phase, and “twin beams” – two light beams having correlated intensity fluctuations. A new world record in twin-beam correlation has now been set by Orhan Aytur and Prem Kumar at Northwestern University, USA (Phys. Rev. Lett. (1990) 65 1551).

Physics World•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

Second-order coherence and the Hanbury Brown–Twiss experiment

Masud Mansuripur

Introduction The degree of first-order temporal coherence, a function denoted by g (1) ( τ ), provides information about the coherence length and the power spectral density of a light source. However, without additional information, g (1) ( τ ) has no bearing on intensity fluctuations and higher-order statistics of the emitted light. A quasi-monochromatic laser beam and the beam of light from an incandescent light bulb, provided that the latter is properly filtered to match the spectral line-shape of the former, will have identical degrees of first-order coherence. Any interferometric experiment involving the splitting and superposition of amplitudes would yield identical results for the laser beam and the (properly filtered) thermal light. Therefore, on the basis of such experiments alone, there is no way to distinguish the two light sources. It turns out, however, that the intensity fluctuations of laser light are fundamentally different from those of thermal light. The two sources can, therefore, be distinguished based on their second-order coherence properties. An ideal photodetector produces an electrical signal proportional to the “cycle-averaged intensity” of the E -field (or B -field) of the light beam at the location of the detector. Assuming that the electrical bandwidth of the detector (including all associated circuitry) is greater than the bandwidth of the incident light wave by at least a factor of 2, the output of the detector should accurately represent the intensity fluctuations of the light beam as a function of time.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 26, 2009•0 citations
In recent years physicists have had significant success in manipulating the quantum fluctuations of light, which originate in Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. They have produced squeezed light, that is light with reduced noise in its intensity or in its phase, and “twin beams” – two light beams having correlated intensity fluctuations. A new world record in twin-beam correlation has now been set by Orhan Aytur and Prem Kumar at Northwestern University, USA (Phys. Rev. Lett. (1990) 65 1551).
Introduction The degree of first-order temporal coherence, a function denoted by g (1) ( τ ), provides information about the coherence length and the power spectral density of a light source. However, without additional information, g (1) ( τ ) has no bearing on intensity fluctuations and higher-order statistics of the emitted light. A quasi-monochromatic laser beam and the beam of light from an incandescent light bulb, provided that the latter is properly filtered to match the spectral line-shape of the former, will have identical degrees of first-order coherence. Any interferometric experiment involving the splitting and superposition of amplitudes would yield identical results for the laser beam and the (properly filtered) thermal light. Therefore, on the basis of such experiments alone, there is no way to distinguish the two light sources. It turns out, however, that the intensity fluctuations of laser light are fundamentally different from those of thermal light. The two sources can, therefore, be distinguished based on their second-order coherence properties. An ideal photodetector produces an electrical signal proportional to the “cycle-averaged intensity” of the E -field (or B -field) of the light beam at the location of the detector. Assuming that the electrical bandwidth of the detector (including all associated circuitry) is greater than the bandwidth of the incident light wave by at least a factor of 2, the output of the detector should accurately represent the intensity fluctuations of the light beam as a function of time.