Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Modern Physics

Breaking of Charge Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics

K. Lewin

Published Jan 1, 2015• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Deuteron photo-decay with subsequent proton detection represents an experiment similar to Bohm’s version of the EPR arrangement replacing the entangled spin singlet state of the two-fermion system by entangled isospin states. Dropping the conception of truth, the detection as charge symmetry breaking event a posteriori leads up to a pre-existing proton identifying the second possibly far apart nucleon as neutron. That explains what the entangled isospin state predicts without assumption of a superluminal correlation.

DOI
10.11648/j.ajmp.20150404.18

Related papers

The wave function collapse as symmetry breakdown and effect of field quantization

K. Lewin

It is pointed out that ordinary quantum mechanics as a phenomenological theory cannot account for the wave function collapse if it is not seen within the frame work of free field quantization which is needed to understand the particle structure of matter during wave packet evolution and to explain the collapse as symmetry breakdown by detection. Deuteron photo decay and the decay of a two-fermion spin singlet state (Bohm's version of EPR) with subsequent detection of one fermion serve as examples. A projection postulate and superluminal signals are not necessary to understand what entangled states predict.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Feb 8, 2012•0 citations

Locality and nonlocality in quantum mechanics: A two-proton EPR experiment

Roy Mcweeny, C. Amovilli

Two “thought experiments” are central to most discussions of the famous EPR paradox: Experiment 1, in which two electrons with spins initially coupled to total spin S are carried apart to a great distance (e.g., in a molecular dissociation process), and Experiment 2, which is similar but refers to two bare protons. The crucial question to be asked is whether the spin coupling will be conserved at all distances: if it is, then the system exhibits “nonlocality” (the two particles stay “correlated” in some way, even at infinite distance) and thus violates Einstein's principle of locality—which denies that possibility. A recent discussion of Experiment 1 shows that nonlocality is the rule only up to a point at which the singlet–triplet interval is small enough to be bridged by weak interaction with the “heat bath” in which the system is embedded: Beyond that point, the system is no longer described by a wave function but instead by a statistical ensemble. When ensemble averaging is admitted, the spin-correlation function Qc(r1, r2) decreases to zero at all points in space and the coupling is broken; the particles are then independent and neither can be influenced by its previous interaction with the other. In the present work, the same approach is used to discuss the two-proton system (Experiment 2). The conclusions are similar: The protons are described by appropriate wave packets, with an initial overlap sufficient to give a substantial singlet–triplet separation ΔE, and, again, the spin coupling is broken when the overlap (and, consequently, ΔE) decreases to a sufficiently small value. ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quant Chem 74: 573–584, 1999

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 1, 1999•5 citations

np spin correlations in the deuteron ground state

Singh, Ashutosh, Das, Ankit Kumar, Kumar, Ankit +1 more

The deuteron is the simplest atomic nucleus made of two particles - a proton and a neutron. In this work, we study how their spins are quantum entangled with each other. We study two cases: when the deuteron is in a fixed projection of total angular momentum, and when it exists in a superposition of all projections. Our findings show that the spins are most entangled when the total projection is zero, and that strong entanglement still exists even when all spin states are superposed.

arXiv:2506.16621•Jun 19, 2025•0 citations

Locality and nonlocality in quantum mechanics: A two-proton EPR experiment * Dedicated to George Hall—a master-builder of mathematical models.

Roy Mcweeny, C. Amovilli

Two “thought experiments” are central to most discussions of the famous EPR paradox: Experiment 1, in which two electrons with spins initially coupled to total spin S are carried apart to a great distance (e.g., in a molecular dissociation process), and Experiment 2, which is similar but refers to two bare protons. The crucial question to be asked is whether the spin coupling will be conserved at all distances: if it is, then the system exhibits “nonlocality” (the two particles stay “correlated” in some way, even at infinite distance) and thus violates Einstein's principle of locality—which denies that possibility. A recent discussion of Experiment 1 shows that nonlocality is the rule only up to a point at which the singlet–triplet interval is small enough to be bridged by weak interaction with the “heat bath” in which the system is embedded: Beyond that point, the system is no longer described by a wave function but instead by a statistical ensemble. When ensemble averaging is admitted, the spin-correlation function Qc(r1, r2) decreases to zero at all points in space and the coupling is broken; the particles are then independent and neither can be influenced by its previous interaction with the other. In the present work, the same approach is used to discuss the two-proton system (Experiment 2). The conclusions are similar: The protons are described by appropriate wave packets, with an initial overlap sufficient to give a substantial singlet–triplet separation ΔE, and, again, the spin coupling is broken when the overlap (and, consequently, ΔE) decreases to a sufficiently small value. ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quant Chem 74: 573–584, 1999

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

Quantum entanglement in low-energy neutron–proton scattering and its possible consequences

E. Karlsson

Abstract Quantum entanglement in scattering processes has most often been treated in general terms only. A few examples of detailed calculations exist for atomic systems but for nuclear processes it is an almost unexplored area, although it may be important for interpretation of some measured quantities. The present treatment is a study of the time-development of the deuteron-like compound state created in the n – p scattering process. The increase and decay of neutron–proton entanglement in this state is calculated for low transferred momenta over the atto-second range. It is well known that the very high value for the bound proton cross sections ( σ = 81.9 barns) is caused by a specific feature in the deuteron, a virtual 0+ state close to its binding level. In scattering this state causes a negative phase shift δ s in the outgoing neutron wave function, increasing linearly with the transferred momentum. This phase shift is produced during a short-lived virtual energy transfer Δ E in exciting the 0+ state and Δ E is estimated here from the ratio of the phase shift δ observed and the time Δ t it takes to create the entanglement. It is further argued that the nuclear excitation decreases after the n – p encounter in proportion to the degree of n – p entanglement calculated, i.e. as long as the scattering state has deuteron characteristics. This phase shift is neglected in low energy neutron scattering text-books (which are based on the Fermi pseudo potential) and may be negligible for thermal neutron scattering, but will be important already at epithermal energies (0.1–1 eV). The phase shift has measurable consequences in interpretation of INS (inelastic neutron scattering) since its associated energy shift increases quadratically with the transferred momentum. It explains quantitatively certain anomalies found in scattering on water, where water vibration modes are excited far below the expected transferred momentum limit. This paper ends with a short discussion about quantum entanglement in scattering processes in general, with the present example as a starting point.

Physica Scripta•Oct 1, 2019•8 citations

Entanglement in few-nucleon scattering events

Tanja Kirchner, Wael Elkamhawy, H.‐W. Hammer

We investigate the spin entanglement in few-nucleon scattering processes involving nucleons and deuterons. For this purpose, we consider the entanglement power introduced by Beane et al. We analyze different entanglement entropies as a basis to define the entanglement power of the strong interaction and calculate the corresponding entanglement powers for proton-neutron, neutron-deuteron, proton-deuteron, and deuteron-deuteron scattering. For the latter two processes, we also take into account the modification from the Coulomb interaction. In contrast to proton-neutron scattering, no universal low-energy features are evident in the spin entanglement in neutron-deuteron, proton-deuteron, and deuteron-deuteron scattering.

arXiv:2312.14484•Dec 22, 2023•0 citations
Deuteron photo-decay with subsequent proton detection represents an experiment similar to Bohm’s version of the EPR arrangement replacing the entangled spin singlet state of the two-fermion system by entangled isospin states. Dropping the conception of truth, the detection as charge symmetry breaking event a posteriori leads up to a pre-existing proton identifying the second possibly far apart nucleon as neutron. That explains what the entangled isospin state predicts without assumption of a superluminal correlation.
It is pointed out that ordinary quantum mechanics as a phenomenological theory cannot account for the wave function collapse if it is not seen within the frame work of free field quantization which is needed to understand the particle structure of matter during wave packet evolution and to explain the collapse as symmetry breakdown by detection. Deuteron photo decay and the decay of a two-fermion spin singlet state (Bohm's version of EPR) with subsequent detection of one fermion serve as examples. A projection postulate and superluminal signals are not necessary to understand what entangled states predict.
Two “thought experiments” are central to most discussions of the famous EPR paradox: Experiment 1, in which two electrons with spins initially coupled to total spin S are carried apart to a great distance (e.g., in a molecular dissociation process), and Experiment 2, which is similar but refers to two bare protons. The crucial question to be asked is whether the spin coupling will be conserved at all distances: if it is, then the system exhibits “nonlocality” (the two particles stay “correlated” in some way, even at infinite distance) and thus violates Einstein's principle of locality—which denies that possibility. A recent discussion of Experiment 1 shows that nonlocality is the rule only up to a point at which the singlet–triplet interval is small enough to be bridged by weak interaction with the “heat bath” in which the system is embedded: Beyond that point, the system is no longer described by a wave function but instead by a statistical ensemble. When ensemble averaging is admitted, the spin-correlation function Qc(r1, r2) decreases to zero at all points in space and the coupling is broken; the particles are then independent and neither can be influenced by its previous interaction with the other. In the present work, the same approach is used to discuss the two-proton system (Experiment 2). The conclusions are similar: The protons are described by appropriate wave packets, with an initial overlap sufficient to give a substantial singlet–triplet separation ΔE, and, again, the spin coupling is broken when the overlap (and, consequently, ΔE) decreases to a sufficiently small value. ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quant Chem 74: 573–584, 1999
Two “thought experiments” are central to most discussions of the famous EPR paradox: Experiment 1, in which two electrons with spins initially coupled to total spin S are carried apart to a great distance (e.g., in a molecular dissociation process), and Experiment 2, which is similar but refers to two bare protons. The crucial question to be asked is whether the spin coupling will be conserved at all distances: if it is, then the system exhibits “nonlocality” (the two particles stay “correlated” in some way, even at infinite distance) and thus violates Einstein's principle of locality—which denies that possibility. A recent discussion of Experiment 1 shows that nonlocality is the rule only up to a point at which the singlet–triplet interval is small enough to be bridged by weak interaction with the “heat bath” in which the system is embedded: Beyond that point, the system is no longer described by a wave function but instead by a statistical ensemble. When ensemble averaging is admitted, the spin-correlation function Qc(r1, r2) decreases to zero at all points in space and the coupling is broken; the particles are then independent and neither can be influenced by its previous interaction with the other. In the present work, the same approach is used to discuss the two-proton system (Experiment 2). The conclusions are similar: The protons are described by appropriate wave packets, with an initial overlap sufficient to give a substantial singlet–triplet separation ΔE, and, again, the spin coupling is broken when the overlap (and, consequently, ΔE) decreases to a sufficiently small value. ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quant Chem 74: 573–584, 1999
Abstract Quantum entanglement in scattering processes has most often been treated in general terms only. A few examples of detailed calculations exist for atomic systems but for nuclear processes it is an almost unexplored area, although it may be important for interpretation of some measured quantities. The present treatment is a study of the time-development of the deuteron-like compound state created in the n – p scattering process. The increase and decay of neutron–proton entanglement in this state is calculated for low transferred momenta over the atto-second range. It is well known that the very high value for the bound proton cross sections ( σ = 81.9 barns) is caused by a specific feature in the deuteron, a virtual 0+ state close to its binding level. In scattering this state causes a negative phase shift δ s in the outgoing neutron wave function, increasing linearly with the transferred momentum. This phase shift is produced during a short-lived virtual energy transfer Δ E in exciting the 0+ state and Δ E is estimated here from the ratio of the phase shift δ observed and the time Δ t it takes to create the entanglement. It is further argued that the nuclear excitation decreases after the n – p encounter in proportion to the degree of n – p entanglement calculated, i.e. as long as the scattering state has deuteron characteristics. This phase shift is neglected in low energy neutron scattering text-books (which are based on the Fermi pseudo potential) and may be negligible for thermal neutron scattering, but will be important already at epithermal energies (0.1–1 eV). The phase shift has measurable consequences in interpretation of INS (inelastic neutron scattering) since its associated energy shift increases quadratically with the transferred momentum. It explains quantitatively certain anomalies found in scattering on water, where water vibration modes are excited far below the expected transferred momentum limit. This paper ends with a short discussion about quantum entanglement in scattering processes in general, with the present example as a starting point.
We investigate the spin entanglement in few-nucleon scattering processes involving nucleons and deuterons. For this purpose, we consider the entanglement power introduced by Beane et al. We analyze different entanglement entropies as a basis to define the entanglement power of the strong interaction and calculate the corresponding entanglement powers for proton-neutron, neutron-deuteron, proton-deuteron, and deuteron-deuteron scattering. For the latter two processes, we also take into account the modification from the Coulomb interaction. In contrast to proton-neutron scattering, no universal low-energy features are evident in the spin entanglement in neutron-deuteron, proton-deuteron, and deuteron-deuteron scattering.